Skip to main content

The United Kingdom: Meso-corporatism and Industrial Decline

  • Chapter
The Politics of the Financial Services Revolution

Abstract

London’s importance as an international financial centre far outstrips the international significance of the wider British economy. This financial eminence has many foundations, but the most significant lie in the banking community: London’s place in the world financial system rests, above all, on its continuing eminence as an international banking centre. (The extent of this eminence can be seen at a glance by referring back to Table 1 on p. 3). This leading position is traceable to many factors: to the accident of language, because in a century when English has been the world language London possessed a natural advantage over, especially, European rivals; to the equally accidental geographical consideration that has placed London in a ‘time zone’ intermediate between the two other great centres of New York and Tokyo; to a long history as an economic capital, which endowed London with the commercial and physical infrastructure needed to support markets; to the country’s enviable history of political stability; and to the simple fact that for the American bankers who led the first wave of international banking, London was a congenial place in which to live.

The resistance which comes from interests threatened by an innovation in the productive process is not likely to die out as long as the capitalist order persists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For an authoritative description of the traditional style of banking regulation see G. Blunden, ‘The supervision of the UK banking system’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 15 (1975): 188–94.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The City’s international character is particularly well described in Jerry Coakly and Lawrence Harris, The City of Capital (Blackwell: Oxford, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. There is a brief explanatory guide to the legislation in C. Abrams, ‘The New Investor Protection Regime’, Business Law Review February 1987, pp. 31–4/53.

    Google Scholar 

  4. An authoritative view of the theory and practice of the SIB is Sir K. Berrill, ‘Regulation in a changing City-bureaucrats and practitioners’, Midland Bank Review, Summer 1986, pp. 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Wolman, ‘SIB bears brunt of City criticism’, Financial Times, 29 March 1988;

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Brierley, ‘City revolts against the regulators’, Sunday Times, 21 February 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The most authoritative account of FIMBRA is provided by: E. Z. Lomnicka and J. L. Powell, Encyclopedia of Financial Services Law Vol. II (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1987, periodically revised), pp. 8–09 to 8–228.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. White, ‘Investor Protection and the Commodity Markets’, Business Law Review, August–September 1986, pp. 219–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Makin, ‘First Big Bang, now Big Brother’, Institutional Investor May 1988, pp. 58–67 is a brief account of the power implications of the new structure.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The historical background and the analytical issues can be found in: Sir John Clapham, The Bank of England: A History vol. II (London: Cambridge University Press, 1944) pp. 95–102, 199–211, 226–34, 263ff;

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. E. Wadsworth, ‘Banking Ratios Past and Present’ in C. R. Whittesley, and J. S. G. Wilson (eds), Essays in Money and Banking (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968) pp. 229–51;

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. S. Presnell, ‘Gold Reserves, Banking Reserves and the Baring Crisis of 1890’, in Whittesley and Wilson, ibid., pp. 167–228; F. Hirsch, ‘The Bagehot Problem’, The Manchester School, vol. 45, no. 2 (1977): 241–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. The authoritative picture for the years immediately before the Great War is given by R. S. Sayers, The Bank of England 1891–1944 (London: Cambridge University Press, 1976) vol. 1, pp. 2ff.

    Google Scholar 

  14. The account of Montague Norman rests on Sir Henry Clay, Lord Norman (London: Macmillan, 1957) pp. 278ff; and

    Google Scholar 

  15. Andrew Boyle, Montague Norman (London: Cassell, 1967) pp. 124ff. For the organisation of markets see, for example

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michael Artis, Foundations of British Monetary Policy (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1965) pp. 68–75 and 83–93;

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. A. Fletcher, The Discount Houses in London (London: Macmillan, 1976) pp. 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The best study remains Michael Clark, Fallen Idols: Elites and the Search for the Acceptable Face of Capitalism (London: Junction Books, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  19. The origins and cause of the crisis are in Margaret Reid, The Secondary Banking Crisis, 1973–75 (London: Macmillan, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  20. My economic understanding of these events relies heavily on Maximilian Hall, Financial Deregulation: A Comparative Study of Australia and the United Kingdom (London: Macmillan, 1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. D. H. A. Ingram, ‘Change in the Stock Exchange and the regulation of the City’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, February 1987, pp. 54–65.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Office of Fair Trading, Annual Report of the Director General of Fair Trading, 1976 (London: HMSO, 1977) pp. 33–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Jones, ‘The changing UK securities market: a Stock Exchange view’, The Company Lawyer, 5 (1984) pp. 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  24. The background is sketched in P. Farmer, ‘Towards a Tougher Regime Against Insider Dealing’, Business Law Review, December 1987, 283–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. For an analysis of cases see B. A. K. Rider, ‘Self-Regulation: The British Approach to Policing Conduct in the Securities Business, With Particular Reference to the Role of the City Panel on Take Overs and Mergers in the Regulation of Insider Trading’, Journal of Comparative Corporate Law and Securities Regulation, 1 (1978): 319–48.

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. P. Lee, ‘Law and Practice with Respect to Insider Trading and Trading on Market Information in the United Kingdom’, Journal of Comparative Corporate Law and Securities Regulation, 4 (1982): 389–90;

    Google Scholar 

  27. Council for the Securities Industry, Statement on Insider Dealing (London: CSI, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Cassell, ‘Government may reopen insider dealing cases’, Financial Times, 8 December 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  29. L. H. Leigh, The Control of Commercial Fraud (London: Heinemann, 1982) p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1991 Michael Moran

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moran, M. (1991). The United Kingdom: Meso-corporatism and Industrial Decline. In: The Politics of the Financial Services Revolution. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377899_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics