Abstract
Why do readers — and especially literary critics — feel the need to classify works of art into categories which one often calls genres? On the one hand fashionable ideas lead some commentators to argue that, in this infinitely innovative world, genres have become irrelevant because traditional rules have been subverted. The ineffable text (sacralized in italics) is all that counts. Yet, on the other, their description of works of literature inevitably resorts to such terms as ‘fantasy’, ‘allegory’, ‘realism’, ‘tragedy’, even if they carefully place these in inverted commas. As the ‘reception’ school of criticism has convincingly shown, a novel, poem or play takes on its full meaning when it is integrated in the framework of the reader’s or spectator’s generic expectations.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Jean-Pierre Durix
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Durix, JP. (1998). Are Distinctions Between Genres Still Relevant?. In: Mimesis, Genres and Post-Colonial Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377165_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377165_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40695-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37716-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)