Abstract
For much of the post-war era, the nature and scope of international security was defined by the parameters of the Cold War. This term was used to describe a climate of hostility and rivalry that developed between the Western (non-communist) and Eastern (communist) blocs shortly after the Second World War. A pervasive sense of threat meant that the hegemonic bloc leaders, the US and the USSR, engaged in a political competition, not only with each other, but also for the allegiance of the world at large.1 No continent was spared from the effects of the Cold War. This global struggle was waged through ideological means, economic rivalry, arms races, propaganda, diplomatic outbursts, threats of force and the use of client states to promote each side’s course. While the Cold War contained many of the features of traditional great power rivalries, it fell short of direct armed conflict between the two main antagonists. It was a condition of ‘neither peace nor war’. Such an uneasy mix was upheld by nuclear weapons and the superpower fear of mutual assured destruction.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
John Groom, ‘The End of the Cold War: Conceptual and Theoretical Implications for the Study of International Relations’, Paper delivered at the University of Otago, 4 July 1995, p. 1.
Ian Clark, Globalization and Fragmentation: International Relations in the Twentieth Century ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997 ), p. 173.
W.B. Gallie ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’ in Max Black, ed., The Importance of Language (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1962 ), p. 121.
Arnold Wolfers, Discord and Collaboration ( Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962 ), p. 150.
Martin Hollis and Steve Smith, Explaining and Understanding International Relations ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991 ), pp. 17–28.
A. Reynolds, An Introduction to International Relations, 3rd Edition ( London: Longman, 1994 ), p. 5.
John Mearsheimer, ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International Security, Vol. 15, no.1 (Summer 1990 ).
Gebhard Geiger, ‘International Security in the Information Age: New Structures and Challenges’, Aussenpolitik, Vol. 48, No. 4, 1997, p. 402.
Jack Spence, ‘Entering the future backwards: some reflections on the current international scene’ Review of International Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1 (January 1994), p. 4.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 University of Otago
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Patman, R.G. (1999). Introduction. In: Patman, R.G. (eds) Security in a Post-Cold War World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377059_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377059_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40697-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37705-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)