Abstract
Theodicies are an extreme example of the philosophical reluctance to accept that there may be something beyond human understanding; not something accidentally or temporarily beyond it, but something necessarily beyond human understanding. Secular explanations, offered as alternatives to theodicies, exemplify the same reluctance. That something could be necessarily beyond human understanding seems to be an intolerable thought, the denial of a philosophical vocation. Surely, it is said, the philosopher must seek to understand anything. But, then, might not a philosopher come to understand that there is something beyond human understanding? My aim in this essay is to show that the great divide in contemporary philosophy of religion, is not between those who offer religious explanations, and those who offer non-religious explanations, of the limits of human existence, but between those who recognise and those who do not recognise, that the limits of human existence are beyond human understanding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
D. Z. Phillips, Belief, Change and Forms of Life (Macmillan and Humanities Press, 1986) pp. 70–71. See Chapter Four for details of my criticisms. These are taken from a symposium with Richard Swinburne on ‘The Problem of Evil’, in Reason and Religion, ed. S. Brown (Cornell University Press, 1977). For related criticisms see my The Concept of Prayer (1965) (Blackwell, 1981), Chapter Five and Death and Immortality ( Macmillan, 1970) Chapter Two.
See D. Z. Phillips, ‘From World to God?’, in Faith and Philosophical Enquiry (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970).
R. Rhees, ‘Science and Questioning’, in Without Answers (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969) p. 16.
See D. Z. Phillips, ‘What the Complex Did to Oedipus’, in Through A Darkening Glass (University of Notre Dame Press and Basil Blackwell, 1982 ).
See D. Z. Phillips, The Concept of Prayer (1965) (Blackwell, 1981), Chapter Four: ‘Prayer As Talking To Someone One Does Not Understand’.
S. Beckett, Endgame (Faber and Faber, 1976), p. 37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 D. Z. Phillips
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Phillips, D.Z. (1993). On Not Understanding God. In: Wittgenstein and Religion. Swansea Studies in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377035_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377035_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-58620-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37703-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)