Abstract
Revolutions were anathema to the Catholic Church in the nineteenth century; anti-clericalism had been a powerful and, ultimately, a very self-destructive element in revolutionary thinking and policy in the 1790s. The revolutionaries, influenced in part by the ideas of the mid-eighteenth-century philosophes, had been determined to destroy the church as one of the most powerful privileged corporations in the country. The church was the first of the three estates into which ancien régime society was divided. It was one of the largest and richest landowners, its senior posts were dominated by old noble families and it exercised a major political role, not always in sympathy with the monarchy. In the eighteenth century the estates of Languedoc, in which the clerical first estate was a powerful force, fought to preserve their autonomy from royal interference.1 Arguably it was a colossal block to innovation in ideas, institutions and behavior.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
B. Fitzpatrick, Catholic royalism in the department of the Gard, 1814–52 (1983) p. 188.
D. M. G. Sutherland, France 1789–1815. Revolution and Counterrevolution (1985) pp. 112–13.
G. de Bertier de Sauvigny, Le comte Ferdinande de Bertier et l’enigme de la congrégation (1948).
Descriptions of the work of the missionaries can be found in E. Sévrin, Les missions religieuses en France sous la Restauration (1948, 1959).
A lecturer in philosophy at the seminary at Ornans, Doney was a follower of Lamennais for a time. He became bishop of Montauban in 1843. Bosson, Notices biographiques, vol. I (1889) pp. 303–15.
J. P. Martin, La nonciature de Paris et les affaires écclesiastiques de la France sous le règne de Louis–Philippe (1949) p. 82, 85.
R. Limouzin-Lamothe, Monseigneur de Quélen, archévêque de Paris, vol. II (1957) pp. 47–9, 55.
R. Limouzin-Lamothe, ‘L’émeute de St Germain l’Auxerrois d’après une relation inedite du chapitre metropolitain’, Etudes Franciscaines, XIII (1963) 190.
D. C. Higgs, Nobles in Nineteenth Century France. The practice of inegalitarianism (1987).
G. de Bertier de Sauvigny, Documents inédits sur la conspiration légitimiste de 1830–32 (1946) and ‘La conspiration des légitimistes et de la duchesse de Berry contre Louis–Philippe, 1830–32’, Études d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, 3 (1951) xvii–125.
A. J. Tudesq, Les Conseillers Généraux en France au temps de Guizot, 1840–48 (1967) pp. 221–30.
de Villeneuve–Bargemont, Economie politique chrétienne. See also K. A. Lynch, Family, Class and Ideology in early Industrial France (1988).
J. B. Duroselle, Les débuts du catholicisme social en France (1822–70) (1951) pp. 199–200, 236.
B. G. Smith, Ladies of the Leisure Class (1981).
R. Anderson, Education in France, 1848–70 (1975).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1991 Pamela M. Pilbeam
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pilbeam, P.M. (1991). Religion and Revolutionary Politics. In: The 1830 Revolution in France. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376861_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376861_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-61998-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37686-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)