Abstract
When he became Chair of the Labour Party in May 1945 Laski appeared to have fulfilled the personal ambitions that he had held as a young man. He was close to the centre of political affairs, he enjoyed a world-wide reputation as a Socialist theorist, he had a vast international circle of acquaintances, he was an influential populariser of Left-wing causes, and he was secure in his academic role. He was also confident that the Labour Party would win the forthcoming General Election and that there was, at the very least, a good chance that it would implement the ‘revolution by consent’ that he had urged throughout the war. Four years later, when he finally left the Labour Party National Executive the position seemed quite different. He was, of course, still a well-known figure and he was generally satisfied with the domestic achievements of the Labour Government. But he no longer carried any influence with the leadership, his public image had been undermined, his academic contributions were often attacked or ignored, and even his following amongst the Labour Party rank-and-file was greatly reduced. This dramatic decline in prestige was tragic. In the first place, it dealt a crippling blow to Laski’s own self-esteem and certainly contributed to his early death in 1950. Secondly, it meant that his views at this time have never received the attention that they deserve.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Henry Pelling, ‘The 1945 General Election Reconsidered’, Historical Journal, 23 (2), 1980, p. 404 (hereafter Pelling, ‘1945 General Election’).
Ben Pimlott (ed.) The Political Diary of Hugh Dalton, 1918–40, 1945–60 (Cape/LSE, 1986) (hereafter Dalton Diary) July 1945 p. 357.
B. Donoughue and G. Jones, Herbert Morrison (Weidenfeld, 1973) pp. 341–3 (hereafter Donoughue and Jones, Morrison).
Kenneth O. Morgan, Labour in Power (Oxford University Press, 1985) p. 71 (hereafter Morgan, Labour in Power).
Francis Williams, A Prime Minister Remembers (Heinemann, 1961) pp. 90–1.
D. Hooper, Public Scandal, Odium and Contempt (Secker and Warburg, 1984).
Ibid., pp. 9–10. See also Day’s letter of 5 February 1976 quoted by F. Bresler, Lord Goddard (Harrap, 1977) (hereafter Bresler, Goddard) p. 155.
Marc Karson, ‘Harold Laski and the Soviet Union’, New Politics, Spring 1965, p. 82.
For Blum’s articles and the resolution, see L’Oeuvre de Léon Blum vol. 6 (Albin Michel, 1958). The influence was reciprocal: Laski’s arguments recalled those used by Blum at the Congress of Tours in 1920. See Jean Lacouture, Léon Blum (Seuil, 1977) pp. 163–72.
Ibid. See also Nuova Europa, 3 September 1945, cited in P. Sebastiani, Laburisti Inglesi e Socialisti Italiani (FIAP, 1983 ) p. 99.
To Frida, 23 April 1946, FHL; and Harry Pollitt, Laski’s Mistake (Communist Party, 1946 ).
For a similar brief interpretation, see M. Peretz, ‘Laski Redivivus’, Journal of Contemporary History, 1 (2), 1966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1993 Michael Newman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Newman, M. (1993). Political Trials. In: Harold Laski. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376847_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376847_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38854-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37684-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)