Abstract
After the reopening of the playhouses at the Restoration theatre managers had perforce to build their initial repertoire from the rich stock of pre-Civil War playscripts. The earliest recorded performance after the king’s return was of Epicoene, or The Silent Woman — a harbinger of the strong Jonsonian presence in the list of subsequent revivals. Jonson’s renewed prosperity in the playhouse was buttressed by a formidable and burgeoning critical reputation. It was therefore natural that novice dramatists should have consulted Jonsonian precedents as they nerved themselves to devise new plays for contemporary audiences. Equally, staging Jonson’s own plays in the unprecedented circumstances of the early 1660s demanded of the players a responsiveness to the ways in which mid-century experience might have rendered some of their materials freshly resonant or politically sensitive. The present essay aims to explore two related, and mutually illuminating, case studies in the history of the Jonsonian presence in the early Restoration playhouses — namely, the difficulties which attended the return of Bartholomew Fair to the stage and the ingenious use made of that comedy by a new dramatist in writing a comedy adventurously addressed to urgent current preoccupations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. Sutherland, English Literature of the Late Seventeenth Century (Oxford, 1969), p. 92.
K. M. Lynch, The Social Mode of Restoration Comedy (New York, 1926), p. 121.
J. Wilson, The Cheats, ed. M. C. Nahm (Oxford, 1935), p. 1.
For a survey of Lacy s career, see P. H. Highfill, Jr, K. A. Burnim and E. A. Langhans (eds), A Biographical Dictionary of Actors, Actresses, Musicians, Dancers, Managers and Other Stage Personnel in London, 1660–1800, vol. IX (Carbondale and Edwardsville, Illinois, 1984), pp. 98–104.
J. Downes, Roscius Anglicanus, eds J. Milhous and R. D. Hume (London, 1987), p. 40.
Alfred Harbage, ‘Elizabethan-Restoration palimpsest’, Modern Language Review, 35 (1940), p. 305, tentatively experimented with the possibility that The Cheats was a (modest) rewriting of a pre-1642 manuscript original by another author, but could offer no serious evidence in support of such a surmise.
R. D. Hume, ‘Securing a repertory: plays on the London stage 1660–5’, in A. Coleman and A. Hammond (eds), Poetry and Drama 1570–1700: Essays in Honour of Harold F. Brooks (London, 1981), pp. 157–61.
D. Ogg, England in the Reign of Charles II (Oxford, 1967), p. 201.
N. W. Bawcutt (ed.), The Control and Censorship of Caroline Drama: The Records of Sir Henry Herbert, Master of the Revels 1623–73 (Oxford, 1996), p. 268.
F. Teague, The Curious History of ‘Bartholomew Fair’ (Lewisburg, Pa., 1985), p. 61.
P. Seaward, The Cavalier Parliament and the Reconstruction of the Old Regime, 1661–1667 (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 18, 54, 53.
J. P. Kenyon (ed.), The Stuart Constitution 1603–1688: Documents and Commentary (Cambridge, 1969), p. 358.
J. M. Rosenheim, ‘Documentary authority: texts and magistracy in Restoration society’, Albion, 25 (1993), p. 591.
S. Pepys, Diary, eds R. C. Latham and W. Matthews (London, 1970–83), vol. V, p. 230.
E. Howard, The Change of Crownes, ed. F. S. Boas (London, 1949), p. 9; Pepys, Diary, eds Latham and Matthews, vol. VIII, pp. 167–8.
See, for example, I. Donaldson, Jonson’s Magic Houses: Essays in Interpretation (Oxford, 1997), pp. 47–65.
J. A. Barish, Ben Jonson and the Language of Prose Comedy (Cambridge, Mass, 1960), pp. 201–3.
E. Leites, ‘Casuistry and character’, in E. Leites (ed.), Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge, 1988), pp. 119–20, 127.
J. Taylor, ‘Ductor Dubitantium’, quoted in P. Zagorin, Ways of Lying: Dissimulation, Persecution, and Conformity in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge, Mass., 1990), p. 222.
J. Spurr, ‘Perjury, profanity and politics’, The Seventeenth Century, 8 (1993), pp. 29–31.
K. Thomas, ‘Cases of conscience in seventeenth-century England’, in J. Morrill, P. Slack and D. Woolf (eds), Public Duty and Private Conscience in Seventeenth-Century England: Essays Presented to G. E. Aylmer (Oxford, 1993), p. 43.
S. Butler, Hudibras, ed. J. Wilders (Oxford, 1967), p. 130.
D. Underdown, Pride’s Purge: Politics in the Puritan Revolution (Oxford, 1971), p. 310.
A. R. Jonsen and S. Toulmin, The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning (Berkeley, Calif., 1988), p. 212.
A. Snider, ‘By equivocation swear: Hudibras and the politics of interpretation’, The Seventeenth Century, 5 (1990), p. 158.
S. Butler, Prose Observations, ed. H. De Quehen (Oxford, 1979), p. 6.
J. Lacy, The Old Troop: Or, Monsieur Raggou (London, [16721), p. 47.
D. Underdown, Revel, Riot, and Rebellion: Popular Politics and Culture in England 1603–1660 (Oxford, 1985), p. 288.
P. Seaward, The Restoration, 1660–1688 (London, 1991), p. 2.
E. Hyde, Earl of Clarendon, The History of the Rebellion and Civil Wars, ed. W. D. Macray (Oxford, 1888), vol. VI, p. 234.
L. S. Marcus, The Politics of Mirth: Jonson, Herrick, Milton, Marvell, and the Defense of Old Holiday Pastimes (Chicago, 1986), p. 60.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cordner, M. (1999). Zeal-of-the-Land Busy Restored. In: Butler, M. (eds) Re-Presenting Ben Jonson. Early Modern Literature in History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376724_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376724_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40452-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37672-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)