Abstract
Throughout its life, the study of Soviet affairs has been marked by a curious dualism. On the one hand, students have emphasised the importance of a single political institution, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU). It was the allencompassing nature of this organisation, with its tentacles in every factory, farm, school and residential area in the country, which was the central point of many of the major theoretical frameworks constructed to explain Soviet affairs, including the mono-organisational society and totalitarianism. It was the party and the power it wielded which was believed to set the Soviet system apart from its contemporaries, to make it unique among political systems. The fact that this system was exported following the war reinforced the apparent significance of the communist party-centred system by suggesting that this was not a chance occurrence resulting from Russia’s unique historical heritage. It was a system which could operate in other historical and cultural contexts and was not therefore a one-off, chance development. Moreover the erosion of the monopoly of political power by a single organisation has widely been seen as central to the collapse of communism in both the Soviet Union and the countries of Eastern Europe.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1997 Graeme Gill and Roderic Pitty
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gill, G., Pitty, R. (1997). What Sort of Organisation was the Communist Party?. In: Power in the Party. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376694_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376694_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39843-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37669-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)