Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gendering the Household: Some Theoretical Considerations

  • Chapter
Gender, Power and the Household

Abstract

I want to begin by recognizing the possible tensions between an analysis which starts from a gender perspective and one which begins with the household. Both perspectives have been important in the development of current sociological analysis and both perspectives have themselves undergone change. Recognition of possible tensions between the two perspectives has been present for some time (Stanley, 1992a; Arber, 1993; Anderson, Bechofer and Gershuny, 1994; Morgan, 1996) and this chapter aims to outline the bases of this tension and possible ways of going beyond it. At the simplest level it could be argued that gender represents a mode of classifying individuals (as when an array of data is broken down by sex) while households refer to some form of collectivity. Hence, there is always the danger that gender differences will be subsumed under an analysis which takes the household as the level of analysis. This simple methodological point takes on greater significance when it is argued that gender is not simply a matter of difference but is also a question of inequality (Evans, 1995; Morgan, 1996). Here, as Anderson et al. (1994) recognize, a household-based analysis may ignore differences in terms of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allatt, P. and Yeandle, S. (1991) Youth Unemployment and the Family: Voices of Disordered Times. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. (1985) ‘The Emergence of the Modern Life Cycle in Britain’. Social History, 10, 1, 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M., Bechofer, F. and Gershuny, J. (eds) (1994) The Social and Political Economy of the Household. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, J.S. and Kaye, L.W. (1993) ‘Male Elder Caregivers’ in C.L. Williams (ed.) Doing “Women’s Work”: Men in Non-Traditional Occupations. Newbury Park Ca.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arber, S. (1993) ‘Inequalities within the Household’ in D. Morgan and L. Stanley (eds) Debates in Sociology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arber, S. and Gilbert, N. (1989) ‘Men: the Forgotten Carers’. Sociology, 23, 1, 111–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R.W. (1994) Lone Fathers and Masculinities. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, J. and Wilson, G. (eds) (1987) Give and Take in Families. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, N. and Kerr, M. (1988) Women, Food and Families. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, D. (1993) ‘Under the Wife’s Feet: Renogotiating Gender Divisions in Early Retirement’. Sociological Review, 41, 1, 30–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R. (1995) Masculinity, Law and the Family. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, R. (1993) Class and Stratification: an Introduction to Current Debates. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, G. and Allan, G. (1990) ‘Constructing the Domestic Sphere: the Emergence of the Modern Home in Post-war Britain’ in H. Corr and L. Jamieson (eds) Politics of Everyday Life: Continuity and Change in Work and the Family. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C. (1996) ‘The Sociology of Professions and the Profession of Gender’. Sociology, 30, 4, 661–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delphy, C. and Leonard, D. (1992) Familial Exploitation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. (1991) Feeding the Family: the Social Organization of Caring as Gendered Work. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncombe, J. and Marsden, D. (1993) ‘Love and Intimacy: the Gender Division of Emotions and “Emotion Work”’. Sociology, 27, 2, 221–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgell, S. (1980) Middle-Class Couples. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. and Ribbens, J. (1991) ‘Meanderings around “Strategy”: a Research Note on Strategic Discourse in the Lives of Women’. Sociology, 25, 477–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. (1995) Feminist Theory Today: an Introduction to Second Wave Feminism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Family Policy Studies Centre (1994) Bulletin. December. London: FPSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (1989) Family Obligations and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (1994) ‘The Concept of Caring: Feminist and other Perspectives’ in J. Twigg (ed.) Carers: Research and Practice. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. and Groves, D. (1980) ‘Community Care and the Family: a Case for Equal Opportunities’. Journal of Social Policy, 9, 4, 487–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1993) Negotiating Family Responsibilities. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D., Gelles, R.J., Hotaling, G.T. and Straus, M.A. (eds) (1983) The Dark Side of Families. Beverley Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamarnikow, E., Morgan, D., Purvis, J. and Taylorson, D. (eds) (1983) The Public and the Private. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J., Godwin, M. and Jones, S. (1994) ‘The Domestic Labour Revolution: a Process of Lagged Adaption’ in M. Anderson, E. Bechhofer and J. Gershuny (eds) The Social and Political Economy of the Household. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, H. (1991) ‘The Concept of Caring in Feminist Research: the Case of Domestic Service’. Sociology, 25, 1, 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J. and Morgan, D. (1996)(eds) Men, Masculinities and Social Theory. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heward, C. (1996), ‘Masculinity and Families’ in M. Mac An Ghaill (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1990) The Second Shift. London: Piatkus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac An Ghaill, M. (ed.) (1996) Understanding Masculinities. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, J. (1997) ‘Feminist Relations with Postmodernism: Reflections on the Positive Aspects of Involvement’. Journal of Gender Studies, 6, 1, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRae, S. (1986) Cross-Class Families. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, M. (1990) ‘The Re-shaping of Sociology? Trends in the Study of Gender’. Sociology, 24, 2, 269–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (1996) Family Connections: an Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. (1990) The Workings of the Household. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1981) Subject Women. London: Mart in Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, J. (1989) Money and Marriage. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, H. (1985) The Patient Patients: Women & Their Doctors. London: Pandora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. and Morgan, D. (1996)(eds) Body Matters. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. (1996) Queer Theory Sociology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, J. (1988) ‘The Division of Domestic Labour: a Review’. Working Papers in Applied Social Science, No. 13. Manchester: University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, S. (1984) Double Identity: the Lives of Working Mothers. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, S. (1994) Fathers and Daughters. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Social Trends (1996) Annual Review. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, M. (1981) ‘The Division of Labour Revisited or Overcoming the Two Adams’ in P. Abrams et al. (eds) Practice and Progress: British Sociology, 1950–1980. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. (1992a) ‘Changing Households? Changing Work?’ in N. Abercrombie and A. Warde (eds) Social Change in Contemporary Britain. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L. (1992b) The Auto/Biographical ‘I’. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungerson, C. (ed.) (1990) Gender and Caring: Work and Welfare in Britain and Scandinavia. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (1990) Theorising Patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C. (1993) ‘Reflections on the Concept of “Strategy” ’ in D. Morgan and L. Stanley (eds) Debates in Sociology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J., Donovan, C. and Heaphy, B. (1996) ‘Families of Choice: Patterns of Non-Heterosexual Relations. A Literature Review’. Social Science Research Papers, No. 2. London: South Bank University.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. and Fenstermaker, S. (1995) ‘Doing Difference’. Gender & Society, 9, 1, 8–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C. and Zimmerman, D. (1996) ‘Doing Gender’. Gender & Society, 10, 1, 125–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelock, J. (1990) Husbands at Home: the Domestic Economy in Post-Industrial Society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. David Morgan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Aberdeen, UK

    Linda McKie (Senior Lecturer in Health Education) (Senior Lecturer in Health Education)

  2. University of Reading, UK

    Sophia Bowlby (Senior Lecturer in Geography) (Senior Lecturer in Geography)

  3. University of Surrey, UK

    Susan Gregory (Doctoral Student) (Doctoral Student)

Copyright information

© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morgan, D. (1999). Gendering the Household: Some Theoretical Considerations. In: McKie, L., Bowlby, S., Gregory, S., Campling, J. (eds) Gender, Power and the Household. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376632_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation