Skip to main content

Connecting Gender, Power and the Household

  • Chapter
Gender, Power and the Household

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical research on gender, the family and the household has tended to focus upon work conducted within the home, and the negotiation and allocation of resources within households (Oakley, 1974a; Whitehead, 1981; Harris, 1984; Pahl, 1984; Berk, 1985; Morris, 1985; Brannen and Wilson, 1987; Mansfield and Collard, 1988; Van Every, 1995). The origins of many of these studies can be traced to Oakley’s work in the early 1970s which heralded a new approach to research on women, the home, and (paid) work. Oakley’s study of housework not only concerned an examination of the housewife role but also the division of labour in the household and ideologies of domesticity (Oakley, 1974a; Oakley, 1974b). She argued that ‘the kitchen is the symbol of women’s domesticity, and the lifelong activities and identities of women outside the kitchen are determined and defined by their domesticity’ (Oakley, 1974a: 222). Change in women’s role would only follow, Oakley argued, from the abolition of the housewife role, the family and gender roles. At the time this was considered a radical approach to the study of gender and the household and it was one which placed and re-emphasized conceptions of the household, power and hierarchy between men and women as central to the analysis of women in society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adkins, L. (1995) Gendered Work: Sexuality, Family and the Labour Market. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, G. and Crow, G. (eds) (1989) Home and Family: Creating the Relationships. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I. and Werner, C. (eds) (1985) Home Environments, Human Behaviour and Environment Advances in Theory and Research 8. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arber, S. (1993) ‘Inequalities in the Household’, in L. Stanley and D. Morgan (eds) Debates in Sociology, 1967–1992. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arber, S. and Ginn, J. (eds) (1995) Connecting Gender and Ageing: A Sociological Approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardener, S. (1993) (revised edition) Women and Space: Ground Rules and Social Maps. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbo, L. (1987) ‘Crazy Quilts: Rethinking the Welfare State Debate from a Women’s Point of View’ in A. Showstack Sassoon (ed.) Women and the State. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M. and Phillips, A. (eds) (1992) Destabilising Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. and Valentine, G. (1997) Consuming Geographies: We Are Where We Eat. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, S. (1985) The Gender Factory: the Apportionment of Work in American Households. London: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, S., Gregory, S. and McKie, L. (1997) ‘Doing Home’: Patriarchy, Caring and Space. Women’s Studies International Forum Special Issue on ‘Concepts of Home’, 20, 3, 343–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, J. and Wilson, G. (eds) (1987) Give and Take in Families: Studies in Resource Allocation. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, F. (1986) ‘Continuity and Change in the Urban House: Developments in Domestic Space Organisation in 17th Century London’. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 28, 3, 558–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruegel, I. (1996) ‘The Trailing Wife: a Declining Breed? Careers, Geographic Mobility and Household Conflict in Britain 1970–89’ in R. Crompton, D. Gaillie, and K. Purcell (eds) Changing Forms of Employment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, N. (1993) Gender Divisions and Social Change. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, N. and Kerr, M. (1988) Women, Food and Families. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, H. (1996) ‘Gender and Mortgage Default in Swindon’. Unpublished PhD, Department of Geography, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (1985) Masculinities. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A. (1991) ‘Women and the Labour Market: Policy in Perspective’ in N. Manning (ed.)Social Policy Review 1990–91.. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darke, J. (1994) ‘Women and the Meaning of Home’ in R. Gilroy and R. Woods (eds) Housing Women. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (1986) All Work and No Play: the Sociology of Women’s Leisure. Milton Keynes: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delphy, C. and Leonard, D. (1992) Familiar Exploitation: a New Analysis of Marriage in Contemporary Western Societies. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. (1991) Feeding the Family. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, P. (1989) ‘Human Nature, Society and the Home’. Housing Studies, 4, 227–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, L. (1997) ‘Another Day in Paradise? Conceptions of “Home” and Experiences of Domestic Violence’. Unpublished paper, available from the author, Department of Geography, University of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, N. (1996) ‘Renegotiating Gender and Sexuality in Public and Private Spaces’ in N. Duncan (ed.) BodySpace: Destabilising Geographies of Gender and Sexuality. London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, I. (1989) ‘Integrating Home and Wage Workplace: Women’s Daily Lives in a Canadian Suburb’. Canadian Geographer, 33, 4, 329–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, I. (1990) ‘Space, Time and Renegotiating Motherhood: an Exploration of the Domestic Workplace’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 8, 4, 459–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. and McKie, L. (1993) ‘Public Policy and Equal Opportunities: an Agenda for Change’. Public Policy and Administration, 8, 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1992) The Civilising Process. New York: Patheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (1989) Family Obligations and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (1993) ‘Conceptualising Gender’ in D. Morgan and L. Stanley (eds) Debates in Sociology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, R. (1983) ‘The Meaning of Home-Ownership’. Society and Space, 1, 205–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. (1990) ‘Bringing Bodies Back In: a Decade Review’. Theory, Culture and Society, 7, 131–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, D., Marsh, C. and Vogler, C. (eds) (1994) Social Change and the Experience of Unemployment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy, R. (1994) ‘Women and Owner Occupation in Britain: First the Prince and then the Palace?’ in Gilroy and Woods (1994) Housing Women. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy, R. and Woods, R. (eds) (1994) Housing Women. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, H. (1984) Women, Health and the Family. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A.E. (1997) ‘A Question of Compromise? Case Study Evidence on the Location and Mobility Strategies of Dual Career Households’. Regional Studies, 31, 7, 641–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, M. (1987) ‘Family Networks and the Closure of Employment’, in G. Lee and R. Loveridge (eds) The Manufacture of Disadvantage. Milton Keynes, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, G. (1995)… “Oh We Wouldn’t Live in a Council House…”. Contested Notions of Home and Tenure’. Paper presented at the Annual British Sociological Association Conference, University of Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, C. (1996) ‘Meanings of Home and Home Ownership: Myths, Histories and Experiences’. Unpublished PhD, School of Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney, G. (1997) “… Half of Me was Satisfied”: Making Sense of Home Through Episodic Ethnographies’. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20, 3, 373–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hague, G. and Mallos, E. (1994) ‘Domestic Violence, Social Policy and Housing’. Critical Social Policy, 42, 112–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. and Pratt, G. (1995) Gender, Work and Space. New York, Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hardill, I., Dudleston, A.C., Green, A.E. and Owen, D.W. (1999) ‘Decision Making in Dual-Career Households’ in L. McKie, S. Bowlby and S. Gregory (eds) Gender, Power and the Household. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, O. (1984) ‘Households as Natural Units’ in K. Young, C. Wolkowitz and R. McCullagh (eds) Of Marriage and the Market: Women’s Subordination Internationally and its Lessons. Second Edition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, D. (1981) The Grand Domestic Revolution: a History of Feminist Designs for American Homes, Neighbourhoods, and Cities. London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, D. (1984) Redesigning the American Dream: the Future of Housing, Work and Family. London: W.W. Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humm, M. (ed.) (1992) Feminisms: a Reader. Hemel Hempsted: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. (1978) ‘Cash Transactions and Household Tasks’. Sociological Review, 26, 555–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, P. (1989) ‘Gender and the Construction of Home Life’ in G. Allan and G. Crow (eds) Home and Family: Creating the Domestic Sphere. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, W. (1994) The State We’re In. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. and Moores, S. (eds) (1995) The Politics of Domestic Consumption: Critical Readings. London: Prentince Hall and Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewson, N. and Mason, D. (1986) ‘The Theory and Practice of Equal Opportunities Policies: Liberal and Radical Approaches’. Sociological Review, 34, 2, 307–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., James, S., Kay, H. and Redley, M. (1992) Trapped in Poverty? Labour Market Decisions in Low Income Families. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, K. (1992) ‘Men and Women at Work and Home’ in R. Jowel, L. Brook, G. Prior and B. Taylor (eds) British Social Attitudes, Ninth Report. Aldershot: Dartmouth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, H. (1980) ‘The Family Wage’. Feminist Review, 6, 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. (1983) ‘Understanding the Home Environment: Spatial and Temporal Perspectives’. International Journal for Housing Science and its Applications, 7, 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, S. (1993) Sugar and Spice: Sexuality and Adolescent Girls. London: Pengu in Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. and Meredith, B. (1998) Daughters Who Care. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovenduski, J. and Norris, P. (1993) Gender in Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loyd, B. (1981) ‘Women, Home and Status’ in J. Duncan (ed.) Housing and Identity: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lummis, T. and Marsh, M. (1990) The Woman’s Domain: Women and the English Country House. London: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, S. (1989) Visible Histories: Women and Environments in a Post-War British City. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKie, L., Bowlby, S. and Gregory, S. (1996) ‘Gender Perspectives on Household Issues. Conference Report’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 3, 79–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madigan, R. and Munro, M. (1996) “House Beautiful”: Style and Consumption in the Home’. Sociology, 30–1, 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madigan, M., Munro, M. and Smith, S. (1990) ‘Gender and the Meaning of Home’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 14, 625–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallos, E. and Hague, G. (1997) ‘Women, Housing, Homelessness and Domestic Violence’. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20, 3, 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, P. and Collard, J. (1988) The Beginning of the Rest of Your Life: a Portrait of Newly-Wed Marriage. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, C. (1991) Hours of Work of Women and Men in Britain. London: Equal Opportunities Commission/HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. and Roberts, C. (1984) The Women and Employment Survey: a Lifetime Perspective. Department of Employment/OPCS. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matrix (1984) Making Space: Women and the Man-Made Environment. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, M. (1990) ‘The Re-Shaping of Sociology? Trends in the Study of Sociology’. Sociology, 24, 2, 269–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (1985) The Family, Politics and Social Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (1996) Family Connections: an Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. (1985) ‘Local Social Networks and Domestic Organisation’. Sociological Review, 33, 327–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. (1987) ‘Constraints on Gender’. Work, Employment and Society, 1, 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. (1990) The Workings of the Household. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. and Irwin, S. (1992) ‘Unemployment and Informal Support’. Work, Employment and Society, 6, 186–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, M. and Madigan, M. (1993) ‘Privacy in the Private Sphere’. Housing Studies, 8, 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, M. and Madigan, M. (1996) ‘Style and Consumption in the Home’. Sociology, 30, 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murcott, A. (1983) ‘“It’s A Pleasure to Cook for Him”‘ in E. Gamarnikow (ed.) The Public and the Private. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netting, R., Wilk, R. and Arnould, E. (eds) (1984) Households: Comparative and Historical Studies of the Domestic Group. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1974a) Housewife. London: Pelican Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1974b) The Sociology of Housework. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oerton, S. (1997) ‘“Queer Housewives?”: Some Problems in Theorising the Division of Domestic Labour in Lesbian and Gay Households’. Women’s Studies International Forum 20, 3, 421–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, J. (1984) ‘The Allocation of Money within the Household’ in M. Freeman (ed.) The State, the Law and the Family. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, J. (1989) Money and Marriage. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, G., Moyser, G. and Day, N. (1992) Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pilcher, J. (1995) Age and Generation in Modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, G. (1981) ‘The House as an Expression of Social Worlds’ in J. Duncan (ed.) Housing and Identity: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, T. (1990) ‘Introduction: Design, Consumption and Domestic Ideals’ in C. Newton and T. Putnam (eds) Household Choices. London: Furures Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. (1991) Living in a Man-Made World: Gendered Assumptions in Modern Housing Design. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, D. (ed.) (1994) Gendering Welfare States. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P. (1990) A Nation of Homeowners. London: Unwin-Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P. and Williams, P. (1988) ‘The Constitution of the Home: Towards a Research Agenda’. Housing Studies, 3, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. and Morgan, D. (eds) (1993) Body Matters: Essays on the Sociology of the Body. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, P. (1992) ‘Homelessness and the Meaning of Home: Rooflessness or Rootlessness?’ International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16, 4, 529–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, P. (1994) ‘Tenure, Gender and Household Structure’. Housing Studies, 9, 329–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, J. and Thorne, B. (1985) ‘The Missing Feminist Revolution in Sociology’. Social Problems, 32, 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, J. (1997) ‘Common Place, Common Sense’. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20, 3, 351–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydie, R. (1987) A Feminist Perspective on Sociological Theory. Toronto: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorogood, N. (1987) ‘Race, Class and Gender: the Politics of Housework’ in J. Brannen and G. Wilson (eds) Give and Take in Families: Studies in Resource Distribution. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomas, A. and Dittmar, H. (1995) ‘The Experience of Homeless Women: An Exploration of Housing Histories and the Meaning of “Home”’. Housing Studies, 10, 4, 493–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Every, J. (1995) Heterosexual Women Changing the Family: Refusing to be a ‘Wife’! London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Every, J. (1997) ‘Understanding Gendered Inequality: Reconceptualizing Housework’. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20, 3, 411–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veness, A. (1994) ‘Designer Shelters as Models and Makers of Home — New Responses to Homelessness in Urban America’. Urban Geography, 15, 2, 150–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (1986) Patriarchy at Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (1997) Gender Transformations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, C. (1987) For Richer, For Poorer. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. and Zimmerman, D. (1991) ‘Doing Gender’ in J. Lorber and S. Farrell (eds) The Social Construction of Gender. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, C., Altman, I. and Oxley, D. (1985) ‘Temporal Aspects of Homes: A Transactional Perspective’ in I. Altman and C. Werner (eds) Home Environments. New York, Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. (1981) “I’m Hungry, Mum”: The Politics of Domestic Budgeting’ in K. Young, C. Wolkowitz and R. McCullagh (eds) Of Marriage and the Market: Women’s Subordination in International Perspective. London: CSE Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. (1987) ‘Constituting Class and Gender: A Social History of the Home’ in N. Thrift and R. Williams (eds) Class and Space: The Making of Urban Society. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanagisako, S. and Collier, J. (1987) ‘Towards a Unified Analysis of Gender and Kinship’ in J. Collier and S. Yanagisako (eds) Gender and Kinship: Essays Toward a Unified Analysis. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Linda McKie, Sophia Bowlby and Susan Gregory

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McKie, L., Bowlby, S., Gregory, S. (1999). Connecting Gender, Power and the Household. In: McKie, L., Bowlby, S., Gregory, S., Campling, J. (eds) Gender, Power and the Household. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376632_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics