In this area of philosophy we are primarily concerned with questions relating to the existence of God, the possibility of rational belief in God and problems which face a religious believer. We are not concerned with questions relating to the causes or functions of religious belief. These latter questions are the province of an appropriate social science. Our concern is with the rationality of such beliefs. We are concerned with the content of beliefs, the validity of arguments and the logical implications of arguments. This is an important distinction to bear in mind To give the causes of religious belief will not answer the questions of whether such beliefs are rational or what the criteria of rationality are.
KeywordsCoherence Posit Lost Stake
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 11.J. H. Hick, Arguments For The Existence of God (Macmillan, 1976 ), pp. 76–8.Google Scholar
- 12.I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason (Macmillan Study edition, 1973), pp. 500–7.Google Scholar
- 16.Ninian Smart, Philosophers and Religious Truth (PRT) (SCM Press, 1964).Google Scholar
- 28.E. R. Tennant, Philosophical Theology (Cambridge University Press, 1930 ).Google Scholar
- 29.Wittgenstein, ‘God does not reveal Himself in the world’, Tractatus Logico Philosophicus (Routledge & Kegan Paul, pbk, 1974 ).Google Scholar
- 31.N. Pike, God and Timelessness (London, 1970), ch. 4.Google Scholar
- 34.Spencer, Evolutionary Ethics ( Longman, Rees, 1873 ).Google Scholar
- 40.Winch, The Idea of a Social Science (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977).Google Scholar