Abstract
Part of the aim behind my account of moral thought has been to offer an intelligible background against which the issues surrounding the relation between morality and religion can be considered. These issues are often discussed in an adversarial manner. One the one hand, theistic or Christian thinkers will contend that morality without religion is gravely deficient at best, conceptually impossible at worst; on the other hand, atheistic thinkers claim that religion should have no proper influence upon morals and may indeed be its corrupter. Battle is thus joined over the autonomy of ethics: can morality stand without a religious foundation, or is it something that would be corrupted if based on a religious metaphysic? Even superficial acquaintance with the complex issues raised by these questions reveals that this adversarial treatment of them tends to simplify them. However, for purely pedagogic purposes it is useful to follow out the debate between the two sharply opposed opinions. In the course of discussing them we shall see that the truth is more complex than either presents it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1992 Peter Byrne
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Byrne, P. (1992). Morality without Religion. In: The Philosophical and Theological Foundations of Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376465_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376465_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39029-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37646-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)