Abstract
This chapter develops a typology of states that are said to exist within international society. Rather than providing highly detailed accounts of certain states the chapter adopts a more abstract approach comparing the experience of ex-colonial ‘Southern States’ with the experience of the more industrialised ‘Northern States’. Writings on this topic within the subject of International Relations have emphasised the ‘insecurity dilemma’ that confronts ex-colonial states arising primarily from the fact that, unlike the nation-states of the ‘North’ where the state is generally coterminous with nation, ex-colonial states are usually state-nations, in which multiple ethnic communities reside within a state’s borders.1 This absence of a position of so called ‘unconditional legitimacy’ in the ex-colonial states because of the plethora of ethnic communities that reside within their borders, is said to be one of the main differences that set them apart from the more cohesive states of the ‘North’.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Walker Conner, ‘Nation Building or Destroying’, World Politics, 24 (April 1972), p. 320.
Caroline Thomas, ‘New Directions in Thinking about Security in the Third World’ in Ken Booth (ed.), New Thinking About Strategy & International Security ( London: Harper Collins, 1991 ), p. 267.
Hedley Bull, The Anarchichal Society: a study of order in World Politics ( London: Macmillan, 1977 );
James Mayall, Nationalism and International Society ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990 );
Terry Nardin, Law, Morality and the Relations of States ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983 ).
Robert Jackson, Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations & the Third World ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990 ).
Fred Parkinson, ‘Ethnicity & Independent Statehood’, in Robert Jackson and Alan James, States in a Changing World ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993 ), p. 325.
Jeffrey Herbst, ‘The creation & maintenance of national boundaries in Africa’, International Organisation, 43/4 (Autumn 1989), p. 676.
Max Weber, Economy and Society, vol. i (New York: Bedminster Press, 1968 ), p. 54.
Michael Mann, ‘The Autonomous Power of the State’, in John Hall (ed.), States in History ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986 ), pp. 113–16.
Anthony Giddens, The Nation State & Violence: vol. ii, A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism ( Cambridge: Polity Press, 1985 ), p. 20.
Fred Riggs, ‘Ethnonationalism, Industrialism, & the Modern State’, Third World Quarterly, 15 /4 (1994), p. 589.
David Held and Anthony McGrew, ‘Globalisation and the Liberal Democratic State’, Government & Opposition 28/2, p. 265.
Herbert Butterfield, History and Human Relations ( London: Collins, 1951 ), p. 20.
Nick Wheeler and Ken Booth, ‘The Security Dilemma’ in John Baylis and Nick Rengger (eds), Dilemmas of World Politics: International Issues in a Changing World ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992 ), p. 30.
Will Kymlicka and Wayne Norman, ‘Return of the Citizen’ in Ronald Beiner, Theorizing Citizenship ( New York: State University of New York Press, 1995 ), p. 304.
Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism ( London: Verso, 1991 ), p. 6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 John Glenn
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glenn, J. (1999). The South’s ‘Insecurity Dilemma’. In: The Soviet Legacy in Central Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376434_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376434_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40743-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37643-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)