Skip to main content
  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

It is very tempting to begin by paraphrasing D. C. Muecke on irony and say that so many critics have already not defined Modernism that there seems to be little point in not defining it all over again. Equal circumspection about its beginnings would then be enjoined upon one as a matter of course. The trouble is that the argument against such an elegant evasion of the issue has been compellingly set out by Stevenson himself. In a devastating review of J. Clarke Murray’s The Ballads and Songs of Scotland he writes: ‘Now, modesty is a good thing in itself; but the same modesty which withholds a man from resolving a question, should certainly keep him back from publishing the fact of his indecision to the world in more than two hundred pages of type.’

Since we have explored the maze so long without result, it follows, for poor human reason, that we cannot have to explore much longer; close by must be the centre, with a champagne luncheon and a piece of ornamental water. How if there were no centre at all, but just one alley after another, and the whole world a labyrinth without end or issue?

‘Crabbed Age and Youth’

A critic is a reader who ruminates. Thus, he should have more than one stomach.

Friedrich Schlegel

…to break a butterfly on the wheel, or make it walk the plank.

Alastair Fowler

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Roland Barthes, Writing Degree Zero (1967), p. 9. Quoted in ‘The Name and Nature of Modernism’ in Modernism 1890–1930, ed. Malcolm Bradbury and James McFarlane (1976), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Louis Kampf, On Modernism: The Prospects for Literature and Freedom (Cambridge, Mass., 1967), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michael Levenson, A Genealogy of Modernism: A Study of English Literary Doctrine 1908–1922 (Cambridge, 1986), p. xi.

    Google Scholar 

  4. William Archer, ‘Robert Louis Stevenson: His Style and his Thought’. Quoted in Paul Maixner, Robert Louis Stevenson: The Critical Heritage (1981), pp. 160, 161.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quoted in Peter Faulkner (ed.), A Modernist Reader: Modernism in England 1910–1930 (1986), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peter Keating, The Haunted Study: A Social History of the Novel 1875–1914 (1989), p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maurice, M., ‘What Modernism Was’ in Journal of Modern Literature, Vol. 3, 1974, p. 1072.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Janet Adam Smith (ed.), Henry James and Robert Louis Stevenson: A Record of Friendship and Criticism (1948), p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Roger Swearingen (ed.), An Old Song and Edifying Letters of the Rutherford Family (Paisley, 1982), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kenneth Graham, ‘Stevenson and Henry James: A Crossing’, in Robert Louis Stevenson, ed. Andrew Noble (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. G. Wells, Experiment in Autobiography (1934), vol. 2, pp. 494–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gertrude Stein, Picasso: The Complete Writings, ed. Edward Burns (Boston, 1970), p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ricardo J. Quinones, Mapping Literary Modernism: Time and Development (Princeton, 1985), p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peter Brooks, Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative (New York, 1985), p. 317.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clement Greenberg, ‘The Necessity of “Formalism”’ in New Literary History, vol. 3, no. 1, Autumn 1971, p. 172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roland Barthes, ‘Style and its Image’. Quoted in David Lodge, The Modes of Modern Writing: Metaphor, Metonymy, and the Typology of Modern Literature (1979), p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Claude Lévi-Strauss, Tristes Topiques (New York, 1961). Quoted in David Lodge, op. cit., p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. M. Bakhtin, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, ed. Michael Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin, 1981), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Edward W. Said, Beginnings: Intention and Method (Baltimore, 1975), p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dorothy Van Ghent, The English Novel: Form and Function (New York, 1953), p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Alan Sandison

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sandison, A. (1996). Introduction: ‘A Future Feeling’. In: Robert Louis Stevenson and the Appearance of Modernism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376397_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics