Abstract
I shall now undertake a discussion of collective subjectivity’s hermeneutic dimension and of what will be called its material constitution. Conceived overall, the whole comprising the hermeneutic dimension and the material constitution, plus the space-time dimension to be introduced below, furnishes what could be declared the ‘formal’ causality of social systems, that is the conditions whereby they are (re)produced and changed. The multidimensionality of social systems, recently underscored by Alexander1 – who handles it with reference to the ‘conditional’ and the ‘normative’ aspects of individual action as well as within a renewed version of Parsons’ AGIL scheme – will be thereby assessed, albeit in a different key.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Habermas, Knowledge and Human Interests, p. 244; ‘On Hermeneutics’ Claim to Universality’, in K. Mueller-Vollmer, The Hermeneutics Reader, p. 310. See also Sérgio P. Rouanet, A razão cativa (Sao Paulo: Brasiliense, 1985).
See, respectively, Bob Fine, ‘Labelling Theory: an Investigation into the Sociological Critique of Deviance’, Economy and Society, vol. 6, 1977; and Edwin M. Lemert, Human Deviance, Social Problems and Social Control (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, (1967] 1972) p. 48.
R. Robertson, Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture (London: Sage, 1992) p. 148.
M. Foucault, Discipline and Punish (Harmondsworth: Penguin, [1975] 1979) pp. 135ff; and The History of Sexuality, vol. 1, ch. 4.
Parsons, ‘An Approach to Psychological Theories in Terms of the Theory of Action’, in Sigmund Koch (ed.), Psychology: a Study of a Science. vol. 3 (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959) p. 638.
N. Elias, Time: an Essay (Oxford: Basil Blackwell and Cambridge: Three Cambridge Center, [1987] 1992) p. 81 (and also p. 35).
Fernand Braudel, The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, vol. 1 (London: Collins, [1949] 1972) pp. 20–1.
Braudel, ‘History and the Social Sciences. The Longue durée’ (1958), in On History, pp. 27–9. A steering force behind these shifts were the disputes within French academy. It is arguable whether the result of these disguised skirmishes was healthy to his formulations. See Jacques le Goff, ‘Le Changement dans la Continuité’, and François Dosse, ‘Les Habits Neufs du President Braudel’, both in Espace Temps, no. 34–5, 1986.
Paul Ricoeur, Time and Narrative, vol. 1 (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984) pp. 107ff, 208ff.
Torsten Hägerstrand, ‘The Domain of Human Geography’, in Richard J. Chorley (ed.), Directions in Geography (London: Methuen & Co., 1973); ‘Space, Time and Human Condition’, in A. Karlquist et al. (eds), Dynamic Allocation of Urban Space (Wenneads: Saxon House and Lexington: Lexington Books, 1975).
This is the case also with the discussion proposed by G. Gurvitch, The Spectrum of Social Time (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1964) pp. 29ff. H. Garfinkel (’ Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities’, in Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp. 40–1) has shown that time is an essential element of conversations. We can go further and suggest that conversation – qua interaction – is time in its social unfolding.
See P. Bourdieu, Distinction (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, [1979] 1984) – but also his Homo Academicus (Cambridge: Polity, [1984] 1988).
Michael Shallis, ‘Time and Cosmology’, in Raymond Flood and Michael Lockwood (eds), The Nature of Time (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986) p. 66.
See Barbara Adam, Time and Social Theory (Cambridge: Polity, 1990).
Parsons, ‘On the Concept of Political Power’ (1963); ‘Some Reflections’ on the Place of Force in Social Process’ (1964), in Sociological Theory and Modern Society.
Mancur Olson, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, [1965] 1971) pp. 1–3, 33–4, 46, 65. Marx himself realised the relevance of the problems these writers raise when he discussed the difficult process of class constitution, in terms of the options open to individuals in relation to the definition of their interests and possible courses of action to fulfil them, as well as to the organisations which originate to meet their necessities. See Chapter 4.
See Albert O. Hirschman, The Passions and the Interests.’ Political Arguments for Capitalism before its Triumph (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977);
Elie Halevy, The Growth of PhilosophicalRadicalism (London: Faber & Faber, [1923/4] 1934).
M. Weber, ‘The Social Psychology of World Religions’ (1919) in From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology (ed. by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills) (London: Routledge, 1991) p. 280.
See Marshall Sahlins, Culture and Practical Reason (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1976).
See N. Smelser, The Sociology of Economic Life (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963) p. 34.
Amitai Etzioni, The Active Society (New York: Free Press, 1968) pp. 387ff.
See Lévi-Strauss’s interview to Fábio Altman, ‘Urn Sábio na Tribo do Passado’, Revista Veja, no. 1292, 16/06/1993. For a more general discussion, see George E. Marcus and Michael M. I. Fischer, Anthropology as Cultural Critique (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1986) pp. 37–8, 44.
See Mayer N. Zald and John D. McCarthy (eds), The Dynamics of Social Movements (Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop, 1979).
M. Weber, ‘The Protestant Sects and the Spirit of Capitalism’ (1906), in From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology, p. 308. For his general theoretical standpoint, see Weber, Economy and Society, vol. 1, part I, ch, 1, §1.
See, for Habermas, Chapter 3; M. Foucault, ‘Two Lectures’ (1976), in Power and Knowledge (ed. by Colin Gordon) (Brighton: Harvester, 1980) p. 83.
See Renato Ortiz, Cultura Brasileira e Identidade Nacional (São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1985) p. 58. For the production and consumption of music as a process that involves collective subjectivities (although the author has in mind in fact the outcome of the process in its totality), see H. Becker, ‘Art as Collective Action’, American Sociological Review, vol. 39, 1974.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 José Maurício Domingues
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dọmingues, J.M. (1995). Collective Subjectivity and Multidimensionality. In: Sociological Theory and Collective Subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376342_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376342_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39414-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37634-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)