Abstract
In another place I have described Barth’s “theology of Israel” as simultaneously radical and traditional.1 Barth displayed the radical side of his Israel doctrine when he spoke out against Jewish persecution and declared that anti-Semitism was anti-Christian, when he emphasized the continuing and irrevocable nature of Israel’s divine election, when he engaged in private and public dialogues with rabbis and Jewish intellectuals, when he pronounced Christian mission to the Jews “theologically impossible,” and when he took to task the authors of the Vatican’s “Nostra aetate” for its classification of Judaism as a “non-Christian religion.”
The aggravating image of Judaic Christianity must remain in the German Church as a living monument… that Christian faith is not a national religion.
Hans Ehrenberg, Letter to Gerhard Jacobi, July 5, 1933
After the death of Christ, Israel was dismissed from the service of Revelation … and from that time forth Assuerus wanders, forever restless, over the face of the earth. Even after the death of Christ the Jews are still a “mystery,” as St. Paul says (Rom. 11:25); and one day, at the end of time, for them too the hour of grace will strike (Rom. 11:26).
Michael von Faulhaber, “Judaism, Christianity and Germany.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For recent interpretations of Barth’s theology of Israel see Haynes, Prospects for Post-Holocaust Theology; Katherine Sonderegger, That Jesus Christ was Born a Jew: Karl Barth’s “Doctrine of Israel” (University Park, Pa: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992 );
Berthold Klappert, Israel und die Kirche: Erwagungen zur Israellehre Karl Barths, Theologische Existenz Heute, 207 ( München: Christian Kaiser, 1980 );
Friedrich-Wilhelm Marquardt, Die Entdeckung des Judentums für die Christliche Theologie: Israel im Denkens Karl Barth, Abhandlung zum Christlich-Judischen Dialog, 1 ( München: Christian Kaiser, 1967 ).
Cited in Richard Gutteridge, The German Evangelical Church and the Jews 1879–1950 ( New York: Harper and Row, 1976 ), 58.
Cited in Dieter Kraft, “Israel in der Theologie Karl Barths,” Communio Viatorum 27: 1 (1984), 63.
Jürgen Fangmeier and Heinrich Stoevesandt, eds., Karl Barth, Letters 1961–68, tr. Geoffrey W. Bromiley (Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1981), 250. Cf. Barth’s statement soon after World War II that “where the Confessing Church was concerned, during the whole period of the church struggle, as much as was humanly possible was done for the persecuted Jews” (Cited in Gutteridge, The German Evangelical Church and the Jews 267).
See Hubert Locke, ed., Exile in the Fatherland: Martin Niemöller’s Letters from Moabit Prison (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986), “Introduction.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 Stephen R. Haynes
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haynes, S.R. (1995). Karl Barth, the German Church Struggle and the Witness-People Myth. In: Jews and the Christian Imagination. Studies in Literature and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376199_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376199_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39115-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37619-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)