Skip to main content

Return to a Father: The Homecoming

  • Chapter
Kafka and Pinter Shadow-Boxing
  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

It is once again the old fight with the old giant. True, he does not fight, only I fight, he only sprawls over me as a labourer does on the tavern table, crosses his arms on the upper part of my chest and presses his chin on his arms. Shall I be able to endure this load? (WPC 286)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Lawrence M. Bensky, ‘Harold Pinter: An Interview’, in Pinter: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Arthur Ganz (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1972) pp. 21–2. This interview was originally published in The Paris Review 10 (Fall 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pinter, interviewed by John Sherwood, BBC European Service, 3 March 1960; cited in Martin Esslin, Pinter: The Playwright (London, 1982) p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ronald Hayman, Harold Pinter (London, 1980) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. In 1948, Pinter received his call-up papers for National Service and — to the consternation of his parents — promptly declared himself a conscientious objector. As a result, he was twice summoned to appear before a military tribunal and there was a real possibility that he would be sent to prison. However, in each of the two civil trials which followed, he was fortunate enough to encounter an unusually lenient magistrate, who decided that, since the defendant was under twenty-one, a stiff financial penalty would be more appropriate. On both occasions, Pinter Snr just about managed to scrape together the money to pay the fine. See Michael Billington, The Life and Work of Harold Pinter (London, 1996) pp. 21–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. MIL, follows p. 75, 1. 16; cited in Jiří Gruša, Franz Kafka of Prague (New York, 1983) p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barry Supple, ‘Pinter’s Homecoming’, The Jewish Chronicle, 25 June 1965, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. John Lahr, ‘An Actor’s Approach: An Interview with Paul Rogers’, in ACasebook onHarold Pinter’sTheHomecoming, edited by John and Anthea Lahr (London, 1974) p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  9. James Joyce, APortrait of theArtist as a Young Man (London, 1992) p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Charles Baudelaire, cited in François Truffaut, Jules and Jim: A Film by François Truffaut (London, 1968) p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  11. It would seem that Ruth — whose triumphant transition from despised outsider to royal dam ironically parallels the history of her Old Testament namesake — has had her eye on Max’s seat of power from the very moment she first entered the house: TEDDY: That’s my father’s chair. RUTH: That one? (III 28) There are in fact two large armchairs in the living-room: one at the centre, the other to the right of centre. The first of these is the one that belongs to Max, and is also the one that is occupied by Ruth at the end. See French’s acting edition of The Homecoming (London, 1965) pp. 1; 8; 40–3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erich Heller, Kafka (London, 1974) p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. According to Gustav Janouch, Kafka had summarized the play thus: ‘In […] The Playboy of the Western World the son is an adolescent exhibitionist who boasts of having murdered his father. Then along comes the old man and turns the young conqueror of paternal authority into a figure of fun’ (CK 69). Although fair enough as far as it goes, this synopsis fails to take account of the final twist in the plot. The play in fact ends with the son asserting himself as ‘the master of all fights’. Driving his befuddled father onward, the young fellow departs the stage ‘like a gallant captain with his heathen slave’. J.M. Synge, The Playboy of the Western World and Riders to the Sea (New York, 1993) p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid., p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A modified version of this passage appeared under the title ‘Bachelor’s Ill Luck’ (Das Unglück des Junggesellen) in Kafka’s collection Meditation (Betrachtung. Leipzig: Rowohlt Verlag, 1913). See CSS 394–5. The author offers a more elaborate treatment of the same theme in `Blumfeld, an Elderly Bachelor’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Raymond Armstrong

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Armstrong, R. (1999). Return to a Father: The Homecoming . In: Kafka and Pinter Shadow-Boxing. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376182_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics