Skip to main content

The Polarization of the British Press

  • Chapter
  • 631 Accesses

Abstract

The usual implication in the discussions on the difference between the popular and quality press is that mass journalism exclusively would be market-oriented whereas quality journalism would be protected from the effects of market forces. John McManus developed this notion to the full, opposing ‘market-driven’ to ‘normative’ journalism (McManus, 1994, p. 183). According to the author, the ‘market theory of news production’, which sets as its aim the maximization of the audience, clashes with the ‘journalistic theory of news production’ for which the public understanding of events and issues is what matters most (ibid., pp. 86–90).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Jean Chalaby

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chalaby, J.K. (1998). The Polarization of the British Press. In: The Invention of Journalism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376175_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics