Abstract
In drawing any lessons from the five case studies, two methodological problems arise. Firstly, the reader needs to be convinced that the interpretation of the particular country’s experience is correct. Secondly, it has to be demonstrated that the lessons can be generalized and are applicable to other developing countries. Both these conditions are difficult to satisfy. One way to meet such objectives could be through empirically estimated descriptive (as opposed to normative) computable general equilibrium models of the countries. Counterfactual simulation with the model of the case study country can show that the policies indeed were responsible for the effects ascribed to them. Similarly, simulation of the model of the country to which the lessons are being applied can demonstrate whether or not the policy has a similar outcome. Unfortunately, the requirements of data are too stringent for such an exercise to be attempted here.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1995 Pradeep Agrawal, Subir V. Gokarn, Veena Mishra, Kirit S. Parikh and Kunal Sen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Agrawal, P., Gokarn, S.V., Mishra, V., Parikh, K.S., Sen, K. (1995). Conclusions. In: Economic Restructuring in East Asia and India. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376038_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230376038_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39355-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37603-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)