Abstract
When the Durban Review Conference (DRC) on racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance ended, on 24 April 2009, with an outcome document, which had been adopted consensually by the 183 participating states,2 there was a great sense of relief as this had proved a long and particularly arduous process whose outcome had seemed uncertain until the last minute. There was also a sense of unease within the European Union (EU) because five EU Member States (Italy, The Netherlands, Germany, Poland and the Czech Republic) had withdrawn from the conference at the last minute, in spite of the fact that the outcome document took all EU concerns into account. As a result, the EU suffered a major and enduring blow to its credibility as a big UN player and supporter of effective multilateralism (European Commission, 2003). Indeed, a few months later, during one of the regular political dialogues between the EU and the African Union (AU), the EU was heavily criticised by AU representatives because, in their own words, there had been one major UN event for the African continent in 2009, i.e. the Durban Review Conference, and the EU had failed to deliver. Clearly, expectations on the part of African countries had been particularly high because, in 2001, the European Union, under the strong leadership of the Belgian minister for foreign affairs, Louis Michel, had contributed in a major way to the success of the Durban Conference. This crucial role was acknowledged by Navi Pillay, the current UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, during another regular EU Political Dialogue, when she reported a recent conversation she had had with Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, the South African minister for foreign affairs in 2001.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amnesty International, ‘Combating Racism Calls for Conviction and Determination’, Public Statement IOR 41/018/2009 (20 April 2009).
Bielefeldt, Heiner, ‘The Durban Review Conference –Why EU Governments Should Participate’,, Policy Paper No. 13 (Berlin: German Institute for Human Rights, 2009).
Brown, Roy, Camilla Croso and Marco Perolini, ‘Perspectives on Durban II’, Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Perspectives (Muse Project), vol. 3, no. 2 (2010).
Council of the EU, Council Directive ‘implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin’, Official Journal L 180, 19/07/2000 (29 June 2000).
Council of the EU, Council Directive ‘establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation’, Official Journal L 303, 2/12/2000 (27 November 2000).
Council of the EU, Council Framework Decision ‘on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law, 2008/913/JHA (28 November 2008).
Crook, John, ‘United States Boycotts Durban Review Conference, Will Seek Election to Human Rights Council’, The American Journal of International Law, 103(2) (April 2009).
Durban Review Conference Press Release, ‘UN human rights chief shocked by US withdrawal from Durban Review Conference, urges States to focus on racism not politics’ (19 April 2009), available at: http://www.un.org/durbanreview2009/coverage/press/pr_19-04-09.shtml (last visited: January 2011).
European Commission, ‘Communication of the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: The European Union and the United Nations: The choice of multilateralism’, COM (2003) 526 final (Brussels: 10 September 2003).
European Parliament and the Council, Directive ‘on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data’, Official Journal L 281, 23/11/1995 (24 October 1995).
European Parliament and the Council, Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 ‘establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movements of persons across borders (Shengen Borders Code)’, Official Journal of the EU L 105/1 (15 March 2006).
European Parliament and the Council, Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 ‘establishing a Community Code on Visas, Official Journal of the EU L 243/1 (13 July 2009).
European Parliament and the Council, Directive 2010/13/EU ‘on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive), Official Journal of the EU L95/1 (10 March 2010).
Gowan, Richard and Brantner Franziska, ‘The EU and Human Rights at the UN – 2009 Review’, European Council on Foreign Relations (September 2009), available at: http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/documents/ecfr_un_2009_annual_review.pdf (last visited: January 2011).
Human Rights Watch, ‘UN Race Conference Undermined by Western Withdrawals’ (19 April 2009), available at: http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/04/19/un-race-Conference-undermined-western-withdrawals (last visited: January 2011).
Lennox, Corinne, ‘Reviewing Durban: Examining the Outputs and Review of the 2001 World Conference Against Racism’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 27(2) (2009).
Office of the High Commission of Human Rights, ‘Letter addressed by Navanathem Pillay to EU Member States and the European Commission’ (27 April 2009).
Preparatory Committee of the Durban Review Conference (PrepCom), PC.1/10. Reports, studies and other documentation for the Preparatory Committee and the Durban Review Conference (31 August 2007).
Petrova Dimitrina, ‘Smoke and Mirrors: The Durban Review Conference and Human Rights Politics at the United Nations’, Human Rights Law Review, 10(1) (24 December 2009).
UN General Assembly, ‘Questionnaire to Member States Prepared by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Pursuant to Decision PC.1/10 of the Preparatory Committee of the Durban Review Conference at its first Session’, A/CONF.211/PC.2/2 (9 January 2008).
UN General Assembly, ‘Elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance: comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action’, A /C.3/64/L.55 (3 November 2009).
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, ‘Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to the Durban Review Conference on the implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action and proposals for its enhancement’, Advance unedited version, available at: http://www.un.org/durbanreview2009/pdf/HC_contribution_20_February_2009_FINAL.pdf (last visited: January 2011).
U.S. Department of State, ‘February 16–19 Consultations on the Durban Review Conference (World Conference Against Racism)’, Press Statement No. 2009/141 (20 February 2009), available at: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2009/02/119413.htm.
U.S. Department of State, ‘U.S. Posture Toward the Durban Review Conference and Participation in the UN Human Rights Council, Press Statement No. 2009/178 (27 February 2009), available at: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2009/02/119892.htm.
Van Boven, Theo, ‘The Anti-Racism Durban Review Conference’, The Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 27(3) (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Joëlle Hivonnet
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hivonnet, J. (2012). The European Union in the 2009 Durban Review Conference. In: The European Union and Multilateral Governance. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375918_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375918_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32827-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37591-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)