Skip to main content

Mergers, De-mergers and Strategic Alliances

  • Chapter
The Corporate Brand
  • 240 Accesses

Abstract

In most coherent organisations, there is some sense of identity and strategic direction. People may not be able to articulate it and it may be blurred by a business unit identity, but there is normally some glue that holds everyone together in the pursuit of a common purpose. In quite large organisations there is normally an accepted way of doing things: a set of cultural precedents that people can draw on. All of this, however, can become unravelled when the status of a company changes. When an organisation merges, de-merges or allies itself with another, questions about what the corporate brand means for both internal and external audiences start to be asked. There is uncertainty and fear and a lack of understanding as to what the new relationship with the organisation will be. Its values and purpose may change — factors that perhaps had determined the reason for the relationship in the first place. Its strategy may alter and change the business rationale for being a stakeholder. At worst, the company may cease to be a friend and become an enemy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. M. Porter, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (Free Press, 1985), p. 530.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. McDonagh Bengtsson, Managing Mergers and Acquisitions (Gower, 1992), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. L. Doorley, III, Making International Strategic Alliances Work (The Conference Board, 1994), pp. 21–2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jones R. Houghton, Corning’s Alliances: 70 Years of Joint Ventures (The Conference Board, 1994), pp. 20 and 31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Bleeke and D. Ernst, Collaborating to Compete–Using Strategic Alliance and Acquisitions in the Global Marketplace (Wiley, 1993), pp. 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Schein, Organizational Culture and Leadership (Jossey-Bass, 1985), p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. R. Houghton, Corning’s Alliances: 70 Years of Joint Ventures (The Conference Board, 1994), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Schoenberg, N. Denuelle and D. Norburn, ‘National Conflict within European Alliances’, European Business Journal (1985), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Moss Kanter, ‘Collaborative Advantage’, Harvard Business Review (July-August 1994), p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Marks and P. Mirvis, ‘The Merger Syndrome’, Psychology Today (October 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moss Kanter, ‘Collaborative Advantage’, Harvard Business Review (July-August 1994), p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Bleeke and D. Ernst, ‘The Way to Win in Cross-Border Alliances’, Harvard Business Review (November-December 1991), p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Walker, ‘Making an Alliance Work’, Business International (1990), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Nicholas Ind

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ind, N. (1997). Mergers, De-mergers and Strategic Alliances. In: The Corporate Brand. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375888_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics