Abstract
In 1926, the young Sraffa seemed ready to engage in a research program on imperfect competition:
Almost any producer …, if he could rely upon the market in which he sells his products being prepared to take any quantity of them from him at the current price, without any trouble on his part except that of producing them, would extend his business enormously … The chief obstacle against which they have to contend when they want gradually to increase their production does not lie in the cost of production — which, indeed generally favours them in that direction — but in the difficulty of selling the larger quantity of goods without reducing the price, or without having to face increased marketing expenses (Sraffa 1926, p. 543)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Caravale G. (1997). ‘Some Considerations on the Notion of Equilibrium in Economic Theory’. In G. Caravale (ed.) Equilibrium and Economic Theory, London and New York: Routledge.
Garegnani, R (1976) ‘On a Change in the Notion of Equilibrium in Recent Work on Value and Distribution: a Comment on Samuelson’, in M. Brown, K. Sato and R Zarembka (eds.) Essays in Modern Capital Theory, Amsterdam: North Holland.
Garegnani, R (1984) ‘Value and Distribution in the Classical Economists and Marx’, Oxford Economic Papers 36, 2: 291–325.
Garegnani, P. (1990) ‘Quantity of Capital’, in Eatwell, J. et al. (eds.) The New Palgrave — Capital Theory. London: MacMillan.
Garegnani, P. (2000) ‘Comment’, in H. Kurz (ed.) Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa’s Legacy in Economics, Cambridge: CUP.
Hicks, J. (1939) Value and Capital, Oxford: Clarendon Press (second edition).
Marx (1973) Grundrisse, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Nisticò, S. (2002a) ‘Different Perspectives on Distribution within Classical Political Economy’, in S. Nisticò and D. Tosato (eds.) Competing Economic Theories. Essays in Memory of Giovanni Caravale, London and New York: Routledge.
Nisticò, S. (2002b) ‘Classical-type Temporary Positions: a Cost-Pius Model’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 25, 1, 83–103.
Petri, F. (1991) ‘Hicks’s Recantation of the Temporary Equilibrium Method’, Review of Political Economy, vol. 3, pp. 268–88.
Petri, F. (2003) ‘A Sraffian Critique of the General Equilibrium Theory and the Classical-Keynesian Alternative’, in F. Petri and EH. Hahn (eds.) General Equilibrium, Problems and Prospects, London and New York: Routledge.
Smith A. (1973). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sraffa P. (1960). Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: CUP.
Walker, D. (1997) Advances in General Equilibrium Theory, Cheltenham: Elgar
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2008 Sergio Nisticò
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nisticò, S. (2008). Sraffa 1926 and Sraffa 1960: An Attempt to Bridge the Gap. In: Chiodi, G., Ditta, L. (eds) Sraffa or An Alternative Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375338_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375338_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28514-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37533-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)