Skip to main content
  • 78 Accesses

Abstract

The principle of sovereignty has been eroding throughout the twentieth century, and at an accelerating pace since the end of the Cold War. States are finding it increasingly difficult to claim domestic jurisdiction in order to prevent external intervention in their affairs based on concern about human rights violations or genocide. Conceptual models grounded on an interdependent world order, and a shared international morality, are therefore used to justify humanitarian intervention. It is evident, however, that the mechanisms needed to carry out humanitarian intervention successfully are still in the process of being developed. This is especially true of those activated by the Security Council. Rwanda therefore represents a case of an accepted theory in search of a practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Boutros-Ghali, ‘An Agenda for Peace,’ in Nigel Rodley, ed., To Loose the Bands of Wickedness ( London: Brassey’s, 1992 ), p. 241;

    Google Scholar 

  2. Quincy Wright, Contemporary International Law: A Balance Sheet, revised edition (New York: Random House, 1955 ), p. 37

    Google Scholar 

  3. and Louis Sohn and Thomas Buergenthal, International Protection of Human Rights ( Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1973 ), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Irving Louis Horowitz, Taking Lives: Genocide and State Power, third edition (New Brunswick: Transaction, 1982 ), pp. 165–66.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Michael Reisman, ‘Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law,’ The American Journal of International Law vol. 84, no. 4 (October 1990): 869 and 874.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See also Stephen John Stedman, ‘The New Interventionists,’ Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, no. 1 (1992/93): 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Richard Rubenstein, ‘Afterward: Genocide and Civilization,’ in Isidor Wallimann and Michael Dobkowski, ed., Genocide and the Modern Age ( New York: Greenwood Press, 1987 ), p. 297.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Louis Henkin, The Age of Rights ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1990 ), pp. 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas Weiss and Jarat Chopra, ‘Sovereignty Under Siege,’ in Gene Lyons and Michael Mastanduno, eds, Beyond Westphalia?: State Sovereignty and International Intervention ( Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995 ), p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Comfort Ero and Suzanne Long, ‘Humanitarian Intervention: A New Role for the United Nations?,’ International Peacekeeping, vol. 2, no. 2 (Summer 1995): 147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Israel Charny, Genocide: A Critical Bibliographic Review ( New York: Facts on File, 1988 ), p. 143

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stanley Hoffmann, ‘The Politics and Ethics of Military Intervention,’ Survival, vol. 37, no. 4 (Winter 1995–96): 37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. and Stanley Hoffmann, ‘Humanitarian Intervention in the 1990’s,’ Harvard International Review, vol. 26 (Fall 1993): 9. The Security Council had previously pressed for sanctions against South Africa on the same basis under Chapter VII, claiming that there was ‘a threat to international peace and security.’

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gene Lyons and Michael Mastanduno, ‘Introduction,’ in Lyons and Mastanduno, p. 13 and Charles Kegley, Jr, ‘The Neoliberal Challenge to Realist Theories of World Affairs: An Introduction,’ in Kegley, ed., Controversies in International Relations Theory ( New York: St Martin’s Press, 1995 ), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stephen Krasner, ‘Sovereignty and Intervention,’ in Lyons and Mastanduno, pp. 229–33; Jack Donnelly, ‘State Sovereignty and International Intervention,’ in Lyons and Mastanduno, p. 121; and Charles Beitz, ‘Bounded Morality: Justice and the State in World Politics,’ International Organization vol. 33, no. 3 (Summer 1979): 408–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Raphael Lemkin, ‘Genocide as a Crime Under International Law,’ The American Journal of International Law, vol. 84, no. 4 (October 1990): 869 and 876.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bruce Jones, ‘“Intervention Without Borders”: Humanitarian Intervention in Rwanda, 1990–94,’ Millenium, vol. 24, no. 2 (Summer 1995): 236–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Noreen Burrows, ‘Tanzania’s Intervention in Uganda: Some Legal Aspects,’ The World Today, vol. 35, no. 7 (July 1979): 310

    Google Scholar 

  19. and Michael Glennon, ‘Sovereignty and Community After Haiti: Rethinking the Collective Use of Force,’ The American Journal of International Law, vol. 89, no. 1 (January 1995): 70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Michael Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars (New York: Basic Books, 1977), p. 108

    Google Scholar 

  21. Barbara Harff, ‘Humanitarian Intervention in Genocidal Situations,’ in Israel Charny, ed., Genocide: A Critical Bibliographic Review, vol. 2 (New York: Facts on File, 1991), p. 148; and Reisman, p. 876.

    Google Scholar 

  22. For a discussion of the controversy over African human rights, see Rhoda Howard, ‘Is There an African Concept of Human Rights,’ in R.J. Vincent, ed., Foreign Policy and Human Rights ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986 ), pp. 11–32

    Google Scholar 

  23. Asmarom Legesse, ‘Human Rights in African Political Culture,’ in Kenneth Thompson, ed., The Moral Imperatives of Human Rights ( Washington: University Press of America, 1980 ), pp. 123–38

    Google Scholar 

  24. and Chris Mojekwu, ‘International Human Rights: The African Perspective,’ in Jack Nelson and Vera Green, eds,International Human Rights: Contemporary Issues (Stanfordville: Human Rights Publishing Group, 1980), pp. 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Scott Fairley, ‘State Actors, Humanitarian Intervention and International Law: Reopening Pandora’s Box,’ Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 10, no. 1 (1980): 61.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ali Mazrui, Towards a Pax Africana (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967), pp. 125 and 203.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Farooq Hassan, ‘Realpolitik in International Law: After Tanzanian-Ugandan Conflict ‘Humanitarian Intervention’ Reconsidered,’ Willamette Law Review, vol. 17, no. 4 (Fall 1981 ): 910–11

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jerome Slater and Terry Nardin, ‘Nonintervention and Human Rights,’ Journal of Politics, vol. 48, no. 1 (February 1986): 94; Walzer, pp. 101 and 106;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. and Michael Mandelbaum, ‘The Reluctance to Intervene,’ Foreign Policy, no. 95 (Summer 1994): 12.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Michael Bazyler, ‘Reexamining the Doctrine of Humanitarian Intervention in Light of the Atrocities in Kampuchea and Ethiopia,’ Stanford Journal of International Law, vol. XXIII, no. (Summer 1987): 586.

    Google Scholar 

  31. David Mapel and Terry Nardin, ‘Convergence and Divergence in International Ethics,’ in Nardin and Mapel, eds, Traditions of International Ethics ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992 ), p. 297.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Jean-Denis Mouton, ‘La Crise Rwandaise de 1994 et les Nations Unies,’ Annuaire Francais de Droit International (Paris: CNRS Editions, 1994), vol. XL, pp. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Alain Destexhe, ‘Foreword,’ in Francois Jean, ed., Populations in Danger 1995 (London: Médecins Sans Frontières, 1995), p. 11 and Destexhe, ‘The Third Genocide,’ Foreign Policy no. 97 (Winter 1994–95): 17. UN Under Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Bernard Miyet of France has commented on coalitions of interested countries using their own troops for peace enforcement or restoration, ‘but with a green light from the Security Council.’ See The New York Times May 4, 1997, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Howard Adelman and Astri Surhke, ‘Early Warning and Conflict Management,’ in The International Response to Conflict and Genocide: Lessons from the Rwanda Experience ( Copenhagen: Steering Committee of the Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda, Copenhagen: 1996 ), vol. 2, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Saul Minsky, Reveille for Radicals (New York: Vintage, 1969), p. 93. Although self-interest was used to attract people to the radical cause, Minsky wrote: After the organization is soundly built, they will work cooperatively for reasons of social good rather than individual interest.’

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Arthur Jay Klinghoffer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klinghoffer, A.J. (1998). Humanitarian Intervention. In: The International Dimension of Genocide in Rwanda. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375062_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics