Skip to main content
  • 80 Accesses

Abstract

The United States did not favor either direct or United Nations military intervention to stop the killings as it maintained that the process of peacemaking had become dangerously overutilized, and that Rwanda was of marginal strategic importance. Washington did, however, advocate non-military humanitarian action and legal prosecution of the perpetrators. President Clinton’s initial reaction to the dual presidential assassinations, and the killing of Agathe Uwilingiyimana, typified the US response as he called for national reconciliation and an end to the violence.1 The American position was thus one of regret and non-partisanship, with no intimation of strong action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Holly Burkhalter, ‘A Preventable Horror?,’ Africa Report, vol. 39, no. 6 (November–December 1994): 19–20

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burkhalter, ‘The Question of Genocide: The Clinton Administration and Rwanda,’ World Policy Journal, vol. XI, no. 4 (Winter 1994/95): 47–48 and 52; and testimony of George Moose, ‘Conflict Resolution in Africa: Recent Developments,’ Subcommittee on Africa, House Committee on Foreign Affairs, June 8, 1994 ( Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1995 ), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Milton Leitenberg, ‘Rwanda, 1994: International Incompetence Produces Genocide,’ Peacekeeping and International Relations (November/ December 1994): 8–9. Leitenberg cites an interview with Perry on the McNeill-Lehrer News Hour, PBS television, July 27, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Thomas Weiss, ‘Overcoming the Somalia Syndrome: “Operation Rekindle Hope?”,’ Global Governance, vol. 1, no. 2 (May–August 1995): 172 and 179. When Clinton began his policy review in February 1993 he intended to be more interventionist in the Third World, but events in Somalia then changed his perspective. PDD 25 then represented ‘a policy of stringent conditionality.’ See Leitenberg, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eleanor Clift and Tom Brazaitis, War Without Bloodshed ( New York: Scribners, 1996 ), p. 304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Arthur Jay Klinghoffer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klinghoffer, A.J. (1998). American Reticence. In: The International Dimension of Genocide in Rwanda. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230375062_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics