Skip to main content

Attitudinal and Behavioral Consequences of Published Opinion Polls

  • Chapter
Opinion Polls and the Media

Abstract

It is a truism to speak of the key normative role that public opinion polls play in contemporary democratic societies. Theorists and practitioners have long extolled how polls inextricably link citizens to their elected officials. Indeed, public opinion polls not only offer citizens a mechanism with which to express their sentiment on key issues of the day but also provide policy makers with information about what their constituents might or might not desire. Citizens may be able to express their views on a particular issue through individual acts such as donating money to a cause or writing a letter to the editor of a local newspaper, but along with voting polls are one of the few opportunities that offer the mass public equal voice. Moreover, the role that polls play in the citizen–policy maker relationship hinges upon their dissemination by the mass media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abramowitz, A. I. (1987) ‘Candidate Choice before the Convention: The Democrats in 1984’, Political Behavior, 9(1), 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, P., T. Gschwend, M. F. Meffert and C. Schmidt (2006) ‘Forecasting the Outcome of a National Election: The Influence of Expertise, Information, and Political Preferences’, presented at the 2006, June 19–23 annual conference of the International Communication Association, Dresden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansolabehere, S. and S. Iyengar (1994) ‘Of Horseshoes and Horse Races: Experimental Studies of the Impact of Poll Results on Electoral Behavior’, Political Communication, 11(4), 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. (1955) ‘Opinions and Social Pressure’, Scientific American, 193(5), 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, H. B. (2007) Polling and the Public: What Every Citizen Should Know, 7th edn (Washington, DC: CQ Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Axsom, D., S. Yates and S. Chaiken (1987) ‘Audience Response as a Heuristic Cue in Persuasion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E. (1995) ‘Can Accurate Knowledge Reduce Wishful Thinking in Voters’ Predictions of Election Outcomes?’, Journal of Psychology, 129(3), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babad, E. (1997) ‘Wishful Thinking among Voters: Motivational and Cognitive Influences’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9(2), 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L. M. (1988) Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1957) ‘Interactions Between Successive Polling Results and Voting Intentions’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(2), 318–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bimber, B. and R. Davis (2003) Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A., E. Gidengil and N. Nevitte (2006) ‘Do Polls Influence the Vote?’, in H. E. Brady and R. Johnston (eds), Capturing Campaign Effects (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappella, J. N. and K. H. Jamieson (1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daschmann, G. (2000) ‘Vox Pop and Polls: The Impact of Poll Results and Voter Statements in the Media on the Perception of a Climate of Opinion’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(2), 160–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bock, H. (1976) ‘Influence of In-State Election Poll Reports on Candidate Preference in 1972’, Journalism Quarterly, 53(3), 457–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delli Carpini, M. X. (1984) ‘Scooping the Voters? The Consequences of the Networks’ Early Call of the 1980 Presidential Race’, Journal of Politics, 46(3), 866–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vreese, C. H. (2005) ‘The Spiral of Cynicism Reconsidered’, European Journal of Communication, 20(3), 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R. M. (1993) ‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’, Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eveland, W. P., Jr., D. M. McLeod and N. Signorielli (1995) ‘Actual and Perceived United States Public Opinion: The Spiral of Silence during the Persian Gulf War’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 7(2), 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faas, T., C. Mackenrodt and R. Schmitt-Beck (2008) ‘Polls That Mattered: Effects of Media Polls on Voters’ Coalition Expectations and Party Preferences in the 2005 German Parliamentary Election’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(3), 299–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, J. F., A. A. Haynes and M. H. Crespin (2003) ‘The Media, the Campaign, and the Message’, American Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, R., R. B. Myerson, T. A. Rietz and R. J. Weber (1993) ‘An Experiment on Coordination in Multi-Candidate Elections: The Importance of Polls and Election Histories’, Social Choice and Welfare, 10(3), 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. (1965) ‘Polls and the Political Process — Past, Present, and Future’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 29(4), 544–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. and S. F. Rae (1940) ‘Is There a Bandwagon Vote?’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 4(2), 244–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, M. (1976) ‘Endogenous Bandwagon and Underdog Effects in a Rational Choice Model’, Public Choice, 25(1), 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geys, B. (2006) ‘Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-Level Research’, Electoral Studies, 25(4), 637–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimpel, J. G. and D. H. Harvey (1997) ‘Forecasts and Preferences in the 1992 General Election’, Political Behavior, 19(2), 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giner-Sorolla, R. and S. Chaiken (1997) ‘Selective Use of Heuristic and Systematic Processing under Defense Motivation’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(1), 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, C. J. and J. M. McLeod (1985) ‘Implications of the Spiral of Silence Theory for Communication and Public Opinion Research’, in K. R. Sanders, L. L. Kaid and D. Nimmo (eds), Political Communication Yearbook 1984 (Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Granberg, D. and E. Brent (1983) ‘When Prophecy Bends: The Preference- Expectation Link in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1952–1980’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groβer, J. and A. Schram (2010) ‘Public Opinion Polls, Voter Turnout, and Welfare: An Experimental Study’, American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 700–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardmeier, S. (2008) ‘The Effects of Published Polls on Citizens’, in W. Donsbach and M. W. Traugott (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardmeier, S. and H. Roth (2003) ‘Die Erforschung der Wirkung poli- tischer Meinungsumfragen: Lehren vom,Sonderfall’ Schweiz’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 44(2), 174–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henshel, R. L. (1995) ‘The Grünberg/Modigliani and Simon Possibility Theorem: A Social Psychological Critique’, Journal of Socio-Economics, 24(3), 501–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henshel, R. L. and W. Johnston (1987) ‘The Emergence of Bandwagon Effects: A Theory’, Sociological Quarterly, 28(4), 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indridason, I. H. (2008) ‘Competition and Turnout: The Majority Run-Off as a Natural Experiment’, Electoral Studies, 27(4), 699–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. (1987) ‘Television News and Citizens’ Explanations of National Affairs’, American Political Science Review, 81(3), 815–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, K. H. (1992) Dirty Politics (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffres, L.W., K. A. Neuendorf and D. Atkin (1999) ‘Spirals of Silence: Expressing Opinions When the Climate of Opinion is Unambiguous’, Political Communication, 16(2), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. and P. F. Lazarsfeld (1955) Personal Influence (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, P. J. and T. W. Rice (1994) ‘The Psychology of Political Momentum’, Political Research Quarterly, 47(4), 923–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.-H., M. Han, J. Shanahan and V. Berdayes (2004) ‘Talking on ‘Sunshine in North Korea’: A Test of the Spiral of Silence as a Theory of Powerful Mass Media’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(1), 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, D. R. and D. R. Kiewiet (1979) ‘Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting’, American Journal of Political Science, 23(3), 495–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunce, M. (2001) ‘Pre-Election Polling and the Rational Voter: Evidence from State Panel Data (1986–1998)’, Public Choice, 107(1/2), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavrakas, P. J., J. K. Holley and P. V. Miller (1991) ‘Public Reactions to Polling News During the 1988 Presidential Election Campaign’, in P. J. Lavrakas and J. K. Holley (eds), Polling and Presidential Election Coverage (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, G. B. (1988) ‘The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis’, American Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, C. (1984) ‘Do Polls Affect What People Think?’, in C. F. Turner and D. Martin (eds), Surveying Subjective Phenomena, 2nd vol. (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka, J. G. (1993) ‘Election Closeness and Voter Turnout: Evidence from California Ballot Propositions’, Public Choice, 76(4), 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka, J. G. and F. Palda (1999) ‘Voter Turnout: How Much Can We Explain?’, Public Choice, 98(3/4), 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthes, J., K. R. Morrison and C. Schemer (2010) ‘A Spiral of Silence for Some: Attitude Certainty and the Expression of Political Minority Opinions’, Communication Research, 37(6), 774–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, I. and D. T. Studlar (1991) ‘Bandwagon, Underdog, or Projection? Opinion Polls and Electoral Choice in Britain, 1979–1987’, Journal of Politics, 53(3), 720–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R. D. and P. C. Ordeshook (1985) ‘Elections with Limited Information: A Fulfilled Expectations Model Using Contemporaneous Poll and Endorsement Data as Information Sources’, Journal of Economic Theory, 36(1), 55–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J. M., D. A. Scheufele and P. Moy (1999) ‘Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation’, Political Communication, 16(3), 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffert, M. F. and T. Gschwend (2011) ‘Polls, Coalition Signals, and Strategic Voting: An Experimental Investigation of Perceptions and Effects’, European Journal of Political Research, 50(5), 636–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1998) ‘Effects of Poll Reports on Voter Preferences’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(23), 2119–2130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meirowitz, A. (2005) ‘Polling Games and Information Revelation in the Downsian Framework’, Games and Economic Behavior, 51(2), 464–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1961) ‘Nationality and Conformity’, Scientific American 205(6), 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. H., E. N. Goldenberg and L. Erbring (1979) ‘Type-Set Politics: Impact of Newspapers on Public Confidence’, American Political Science Review, 73(1), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moy, P., D. Domke and K. Stamm (2001) ‘The Spiral of Silence and Public Opinion on Affirmative Action’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(1), 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moy, P. and M. Pfau (2000) With Malice Toward All? The Media and Public Confidence in Democratic Institutions (Westport, CT: Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, D. C. (1992) ‘Impersonal Influence: Effects of Representations of Public Opinion on Political Attitudes’, Political Behavior, 14(2), 89–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, D. C. (1994) ‘The Political Effects of Perceptions of Mass Opinion’, Research in Micropolitics, 4, 143–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, D. C. (1997) ‘Mechanisms of Momentum: Does Thinking Make It So?’, Journal of Politics, 59(1), 104–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, D. C. (1998) Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, D. C. and J. Soss (1997) ‘Reading Public Opinion: The Influence of News Coverage on Perceptions of Public Sentiment’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, R., E. Cloutier and J. Guay (1993) ‘New Evidence about the Existence of a Bandwagon Effect in the Opinion Formation Process’, International Political Science Review, 14(2), 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuwirth, K. (2000) ‘Testing the Spiral of Silence Model: The Case of Mexico’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(2), 138–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuwirth, K., E. Frederick and C. Mayo (2007) ‘The Spiral of Silence and Fear of Isolation’, Journal of Communication, 57(3), 450–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974) ‘The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion’, Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993) The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion — Our Social Skin, 2nd edn (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1995) ‘Public Opinion and Rationality’, in T. L. Glasser and C. T. Salmon (eds), Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent (New York: Guilford Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, T. E. (1993) Out of Order (New York: Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, T. E. (2002) The Vanishing Voter: Public Involvement in an Age of Uncertainty (New York: Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, S. L. (1991) The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, S. H. (2006) ‘Public Discourse and Scientific Controversy — A Spiral- of-Silence Analysis of Biotechnology Opinion in the United States’, Science Communication, 28(2), 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. E. (1937) ‘Recent Developments in the Straw-Poll Field — Part 2’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 1(4), 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. T. and F. G. Kline (1985) ‘The Spiral of Silence Ten Years Later: An Examination and Evaluation’, in K. R. Sanders, L. L. Kaid and D. Nimmo (eds), Political Communication Yearbook 1984 (Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, C. T. and K. Neuwirth (1990) ‘Perceptions of Opinion ‘Climates’ and Willingness to Discuss the Issue of Abortion’, Journalism Quarterly, 67(3), 567–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheufele, D. A. and P. Moy (2000) ‘Twenty-five Years of the Spiral of Silence: A Conceptual Review and Empirical Outlook’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheufele, D. A., J. Shanahan and E. Lee (2001) ‘Real Talk: Manipulating the Dependent Variable in Spiral of Silence Research’, Communication Research, 28(3), 304–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Beck, R. (1996) ‘Mass Media, the Electorate, and the Bandwagon: A Study of Communication Effects on Vote Choice in Germany’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8(3), 266–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, J. (1997) ‘Speaking Up and Silencing Out in Face of a Changing Climate of Opinion’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(3), 602–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, J. and M. Shamir (1997) The Anatomy of Public Opinion (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, L. and D. Bullock (1991) ‘Candidates, Issues, Horse Races, and Hoopla: Presidential Campaign Coverage, 1888–1988’, American Politics Quarterly, 19(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1954) ‘Bandwagon and Underdog Effects and the Possibility of Election Predictions’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 18(3), 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1997) ‘On the Possibility of Accurate Public Prediction’, Journal of Socio-Economics, 26(2), 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skalaban, A. (1988) ‘Do the Polls Affect Elections? Some 1980 Evidence’, Political Behavior, 10(2), 136–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonck, N. and G. Loosveldt (2010) ‘Impact of Poll Results on Personal Opinions and Perceptions of Collective Opinion’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(2), 230–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, F. (2003) The Freedom to Publish Opinion Poll Results: Report on a Worldwide Update (Amsterdam and Lincoln, NE: ESOMAR/WAPOR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Straffin, P. D., Jr. (1977) ‘The Bandwagon Curve’, American Journal of Political Science, 21(4), 695–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J. and L. L. Kaid (eds) (2008) The Handbook of Election News Coverage around the World (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, N. J. (2008) ‘Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure’, Political Behavior, 30(3), 341–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, S. (1986) ‘Do Exit Polls Influence Voting Behavior?’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(3), 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. (2007) Republic.com 2.0 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. R. and H. Yildirim (2010) ‘Public Information and Electoral Bias’, Games and Economic Behavior, 68(1), 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traugott, M. W. (2008) ‘Polls and the Media’, in W. Donsbach (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication (Malden, MA: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Traugott, M. W. and P. J. Lavrakas (2007) The Voter’s Guide to Election Polls, 3rd edn (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyran, J. (2004) ‘Voting when Money and Morals Conflict: An Experimental Test of Expressive Voting’, Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1645–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P. M., H. A. Semetko and C. H. de Vreese (1999) ‘The Effects of News Frames on Readers’ Thoughts and Recall’, Communication Research, 26(5), 550–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedlitz, A. and E. P. Veblen (1980) ‘Voting and Contacting: Two Forms of Participation in a Suburban Community’, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 50(1), 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willnat, L., W.-P. Lee and B. H. Detenber (2002) ‘Individual-Level Predictors of Public Outspokenness: A Test of the Spiral of Silence in Singapore’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(4), 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zech, C. E. (1975) ‘Leibenstein’s Bandwagon Effect as Applied to Voting’, Public Choice, 21(1), 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Patricia Moy and Eike Mark Rinke

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moy, P., Rinke, E.M. (2012). Attitudinal and Behavioral Consequences of Published Opinion Polls. In: Holtz-Bacha, C., Strömbäck, J. (eds) Opinion Polls and the Media. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230374959_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics