Advertisement

Democracy and Apartheid

  • Anthony Butler

Abstract

The brokers of public opinion in the Western world — its media, popular writers and political activists — propagate an astonishingly complacent conception of democracy and its benevolence. Democracy has been elevated to an almost unchallengeable ideal, woven into a tale of inexorable (if occasionally temporarily reversed) human advance, with the liberal democratic state as the institutional culmination of Western progress. This seemingly naive celebration of the forward march of an idea in fact masks considerable ambivalence in popular sentiment. Many people vote a great deal, and believe that their vote is both an effective action and a moral obligation. But abstention, cynicism and the retreat to cause group politics mark an increasing disenchantment with democratic politics. The past two decades have seen voter dealignment and a growth in anti-party sentiment in all Western states.l Public opinion is structured, internally consistent, persistent over time and sometimes subtle: voters recognize the constraints of political life.2 Yet the recent trend towards unpopular leaders in Western democracies indicates a potential fragility of democracy in its heartlands, even as it is supposedly running triumphant elsewhere.3

Keywords

Moral Responsibility Modern State Liberal Democracy Direct Democracy Representative Democracy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    M. Kaase and K. Newton, Beliefs in Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995) vol. 5, chapter 2.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    A.M. Butler, ‘Unpopular Leaders: the British Case’, Political Studies 43:1 (1995) 48–65. Protest, however, is usually couched in terms of institutional or, more commonly, personal failure: established political structures are viewed as self-serving, or political leaders are viewed as corrupt. Democracy is being failed, rather than itself failing.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    See S.P. Huntington, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    E Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Free Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    Following S.M. Lipset, Political Man: the Social Bases of Politics (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    See W.R. Keech, Economic Politics: The Costs of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), especially 211–22.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    J. Buchanan and R. Wagner, Democracy in Deficit: the Political Legacy of Lord Keynes (New York: Academic Press, 1977); but see the cautions in M.S. Lewis-Beck, Economics and Elections (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    R.D. Arnold, The Logic of Congressional Action (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    T. Garton Ash, ‘Eastern Europe: the Year of Truth’, New York Review of Books 15 June (1990) 17.Google Scholar
  10. 63.
    63, cited in G.S. Wood, ‘Democracy and the American Revolution’, in J. Dunn (ed.), Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1992), 91105, 97. See also T. Ball, Transforming Political Discourse (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988) 59–78.Google Scholar
  11. 28.
    J.F. Revel, Democracy against Itself.: the Future of the Democratic Impulse, trans. R. Kaplan (New York: Free Press, 1993) viii-ix.Google Scholar
  12. 29.
    P. Ricoeur, ‘The Political Paradox’, in W. Connolly (ed.), Legitimacy and the State (New York: New York University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  13. 34.
    R. Maidment, ‘Democracy in the USA since 1945’, in D. Potter, D. Goldblatt, M. Kiloh and P. Lewis (eds.), Democratization (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997) 118.Google Scholar
  14. 40.
    S. Greenberg, Race and State in Capitalist Development (Johannesburg: Ravan, 1980) 391.Google Scholar
  15. 41.
    B. Hirson, Yours for the Union: Class and community struggles in South Africa 1930–47 (London: Zed Books, 1989) especially chapter 3.Google Scholar
  16. 50.
    P. Bonner, P. Delius and D. Posel, ‘The Shaping of Apartheid: Contradiction, Continuity and Popular Struggle’, in Bonner, Delius and Posel (eds), Apartheids Genesis 1935–62 (Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, 1993) 34.Google Scholar
  17. 51.
    H.L.A. Hart and M. Honore, Causation and the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
  18. 52.
    See S. Lukes, Marxism and Morality (Oxford: Clarendon, 1985) on the coexistence of historical inevitability and moral appraisal within Marxist political thought. Lukes isolates the problem by identifying within Marxism a consequentialist perfectionism. On the problem of historical inevitability and human agency in Marxism, see G.A. Cohen, ‘Historical Inevitability and Human Agency’, in Cohen, History, Labour, and Freedom: Themes from Marx (Oxford: Clarendon, 1987) 51–82.Google Scholar
  19. 53.
    See, for example, Greenberg, Race and State see also, J. Cell, the Highest State of White Supremacy: The Origins of Segregation in South Africa and the American South (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  20. 55.
    N. Worden and C. Crais (eds), Breaking the Chains: Slavery and Emancipation in the Nineteenth-century Cape Colony (Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, 1993); D. Posel, Making of Apartheid, chapter 9; M. Legassick, ‘British Hegemony and the Origins of Segregation in South Africa, 1900–09’, in W. Beinart and S. Dubow (eds), Segregation and Apartheid in Twentieth Century South Africa (London: Routledge, 1995) 43–59.Google Scholar
  21. 59.
    J.S. Mill, cited in M. Legassick, ‘British Hegemony and the Origins of Segregation’, in Beinart and Dubow (eds), Segregation and Apartheid 59, 51; source of Mill citation not identified.Google Scholar
  22. 61.
    J.H. Plumb, England in the Eighteenth Century (Baltimore: Penguin, 1950) 50.Google Scholar
  23. 62.
    See W.E. Connolly, ‘Democracy and Territoriality’, in M. Ringrose and A. Lerner (eds), Re-imagining the Nation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993) 49–75.Google Scholar
  24. 63.
    See A.M. Butler, Transformative Politics: the Future of Socialism in Western Europe (London: Macmillan, 1995) chapter 2.Google Scholar
  25. 71.
    Quoted J. Lazar, ‘Verwoerd versus the Visionaries’, in Bonner et al., Apartheids Genesis, 372. 72. Dunn, ‘How Democracies Succeed’, 5–18. 73. F. Cooper, Decolonization and African Society: The Labour Question in French and British Africa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996) 469. 74. See S.N’Z. Grovogui, Sovereigns, Quasi-Sovereigns, and Africans: Race and Self-determination in International Law (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Anthony Butler 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Butler
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations