Abstract
The Postscript to the second edition to Capital Volume I showed that by 1873 Marx had already acquired some familiarity with economic literature in Russian. In it he referred to N.G. Chernyshevsky, N.I. Sieber and I.I. Kaufmann, the latter two authors being cited in connection with the reception of Capital in Russia. It so happened that just at the time when Marx had discovered the significance of economic developments in Russia and was turning his attention to that country, some Russians were beginning to appreciate the relevance of Marx’s work for the new situation created in their country by the abolition of serfdom in 1861. These two strands were closely interwoven in Marx’s relationship with Russia over the next decade, so that Marx’s study of Russia and the spread of his ideas in that country are two themes which are inseparably connected.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
B.N. Chicherin, Vospominaniya: Moskva sorokovykh godov (Moscow, 1929), p. 172.
B.N. Chicherin, ‘O krepostnom sostoyanii’, Golosa iz Rossii, Vol. II (London, 1856), p. 177.
Ibid., p. 144; N.A. Tsagolov, Ocherki russkoy ekonomicheskoy mysli perioda padeniya krepostnogo prava (Moscow, 1956), pp. 282–4.
A. Skrebitsky, Krest’yanskoe delo v tsarstvovanie Imperatora Aleksandra II, Vol. I (Bonn, 1862), pp. I–II.
B.N. Chicherin, Vospominaniya: Moskovsky universitet (Moscow, 1929), p. 12.
V.A. Aleksandrov, Sel’skaya obshchina v Rossii (XVII-nachalo XIX v.), (Moscow, 1976), p. 3.
V.A. Kitaev, Ot frondy k okhranitel’stvu: Iz istorii russkoy liberal’noy mysli 50–60 kh godov XIX veka (Moscow, 1972), p. 78.
Yu.F. Samarin, Sochineniya, Vol. II (Moscow, 1878), p. 171.
Samarin, Sochineniya, Vol. III (Moscow, 1885), p. 454.
K Marks, F. Engel’s i revolyutsionnaya Rossiya [hereafter MERR] (Moscow, 1967), pp. 158–9.
B. Nikolaevsky, ‘Russkie knigi v bibliotekakh K. Marksa i F. Engel’sa’, Arkhiv K. Marksa i F. Engel’sa, Vol. IV (Moscow-Leningrad, 1929), p. 391.
N.G. Chernyshevsky, Izbrannye sochineniya, Vol. II (Moscow-Leningrad, 1937), p. LXIII.
Ts.I. Grin, Perevodchik i izdatel’ ‘Kapitala’ (Moscow, 1985), pp. 66–9.
O.A. Saykin, Pervy russky perevodchik ‘Kapitala’ (Moscow, 1983), pp. 14–20.
V.F. Antonov, Russky drug Marksa (German Aleksandrovich Lopatin) (Moscow, 1962), p. 37.
Details of Sieber’s life can be found in L.M. Kleynbort, Nikolay Ivanovich Ziber (Petrograd, 1923).
N.I. Sieber, Teoriya tsennosti i kapitala D. Rikardo v svyazi s pozdneyshimi dopolneniyami i raz ’yasneniyami. Opyt kritiko-ekonomicheskogo issledovaniya (Kiev, 1871), pp. 10–11.
N.I. Sieber, David Rikardo i Karl Marks v ikh obshchestvenno-ekonomicheskikh issledovaniyakh (Moscow, 1937), p. II.
Yu. Zhukovsky, ‘Karl Marks i ego kniga o kapitale’, Vestnik Evropy, Vol. V, 1877, pp. 67–72.
N.I. Sieber, Izbrannye ekonomicheskie proizvedeniya, Vol. I (Moscow, 1959), p. 562.
N.K. Mikhaylovsky, Połnoe sobranie sochineniy, Vol. VII (St Petersburg, 1909), p. 327.
A. von Haxthausen, Die ländłiche Verfassung Russlands (Leipzig, 1866).
A.I. Skrebitsky, Krest’yanskoe delo v tsarstvovanie Ałeksandra II, 4 vols (Bonn, 1862–8).
R. Stupperich, Jurij Samarin und die Anfänge der Bauerbefreiung in Russland, 2nd edn (Wiesbaden, 1969), pp. 41–2, 102.
Skrebitsky, op. cit., Vol. I, p. A; Haxthausen, Die ländłiche Verfassung Rußtands (Leipzig, 1866), p. VI; R.P. Konyushaya, Karl Marks i revotyutsionnaya Rossiya (Moscow, 1985), p. 103.
N. Flerovsky, Polozhenie rabochego klassa v Rossii (St Petersburg, 1869), p. 45.
N.K. Karataev (ed.), Narodnicheskaya ekonomicheskaya literatura (Moscow, 1958), pp. 475–81.
N.I. Sieber, Izbrannye ekonomicheskie proizvedeniya, Vol. 2 (Moscow, 1959), p. 673.
M.M. Kovalevsky, ‘Moya zhizn’, Istoriya i istoriki. Istoriografichesky ezhegodnik 1973 (Moscow, 1975), p. 277.
I. Ivanovsky, M.M. Kovalevsky (Petrograd, 1916), p. 7;
B.A. Kaloev M.M. Kovalevsky i ego issledovaniya gorskikh narodov Kavkaza (Moscow, 1979), p. 10.
M.M. Kovalevsky, Obshchinnoe zemlevladenie, prichiny, khod i posledstviya ego razlozheniya (Moscow, 1879).
M.M. Kovalevsky, ‘Le passage historique de la propriété collective à la propriété individuelle’, Annales de l’Institut International de Sociologie, Vol. II, Paris, 1896, p. 181.
H.-P. Harstick, Karl Marx über Formen vorkapitalistischer Produktion: Vergleichende Studien zur Geschichte des Grundeigentums 1879–80 (Frankfurt/New York, 1977), p. 76.
Adam Müller, Ausgewählte Abhandlungen, ed. Jakob Baxa (Jena 1921), pp. 104–5, 122.
D. Rjazanow, ‘Vera Zasulič und Karl Marx’, Marx-Engels Archiv, Vol. I (Frankfurt am Main, 1926), p. 324.
L. Bazylow, Ostatnie lata Rosji carskiej: Rządy Stolypina (Warsaw, 1972), pp. 219, 284.
K. Marx, Ethnological Notebooks, ed. L. Krader (Assen, 1975), p. 139. Marx’s emphasis.
N.I. Sieber, Izbrannye ekonomicheskie proizvedeniya, Vol. 2 (Moscow, 1959), p. 206.
M.M. Kovalevsky, Sovremennye sotsiologi (St Petersburg, 1905), p. 308.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1996 James D. White
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
White, J.D. (1996). Marx and the Russians. In: Karl Marx and the Intellectual Origins of Dialectical Materialism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230374218_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230374218_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-66857-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37421-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)