Abstract
In previous chapters, particularly the last, I argued that the humanist challenge to positivism had the effect of leaving problematic residual imprints on the realist project as a result of realism’s attempt to embrace the insights of humanism. In this chapter I want to extend this line of thought into a discussion of the role of language in social scientific analysis, particularly as this concerns the question of the relation between theory and evidence. My argument is that a realist conception of social science must clearly reject the humanist characterisation of the relation between lay and social scientific terms. Furthermore, I argue that this is a necessary prerequisite to an adequate understanding of the relation between theory and evidence; that is, one which is able to embrace both the stratified nature of social reality and the various discourses of social science as I have described them previously.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1990 Derek Layder
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Layder, D. (1990). The Language of Social Analysis. In: The Realist Image in Social Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230374171_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230374171_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38913-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37417-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)