Abstract
Man, says Kierkegaard in his Concluding Unscientific Postscript (84), is constantly ‘in process of becoming’, a notion Conrad gives a local habitation and a name to in a remarkable number of his fictional personages. The tormented Razumov in Under Western Eyes, for example, is clearly aware of such flux: ‘“A man goes out of a room for a walk. Nothing more trivial in appearance. And yet it may be momentous. He comes back — he has seen perhaps a drunken brute, taken particular notice of the snow on the ground — and behold he is no longer the same man”’ (1:2:99). To Kierkegaard and Conrad, no man is a fixed entity with an immutable nature — as one sees not only in Razumov but also in Jim and his attempts through the torments of conscience to gain what existentialists would term authentic existence. One sees it in the inauthentic being of the major figures in Nostromo, enslaved to ‘material interests’, and of those in The Secret Agent, alienated by functionalism in an urban desert; in the self-assertion of Victory’s Heyst and Lena through their battle with external forces; and in Kurtz’s radical self-discovery that leads to his perception of his own nothingness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Paul Tillich, ‘Existential Philosophy’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 5 (1944):47; heraustreten in German.
See Patricia F. Sanborn, Existentialism (New York: Pegasus, 1968), pp. 124–6.
Carole Slade, ‘La Chute and Lord Jim’, Romance Notes, 25:2 (Winter 1983):95–9.
George Price, The Narrow Pass: A Study of Kierkegaard’s Concept of Man (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963), p. 192.
See Calvin O. Schrag, Existence and Freedom (n.p.: Northwestern University Press, 1961), p. 154.
Quoted in Simone de Beauvoir, Force of Circumstance, tr. Richard Howard (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1965), p. 199.
See Morton Dauwen Zabel, ‘Conrad: The Secret Sharer’, New Republic, 104 (21 April 1941): 567–8, 570–4.
See generally Neville H. Newhouse, Joseph Conrad (London: Evans Brothers, 1966, and New York: Arco, 1969).
Ford Madox Hueffer, ‘Joseph Conrad’, English Review, 10 (December 1911): 66–83.
See James Huneker, ‘The Genius of Joseph Conrad’, North American Review, 200 (August 1914): 270–9.
Tony Tanner, ‘Nightmare and Complacency: Razumov and the Western Eye’, Critical Quarterly, 4 (Autumn 1962):208.
The view of Arthur Gibson, The Faith of the Atheist (New York: Harper and Row, 1968), p. 97.
Jocelyn Baines, Joseph Conrad: A Critical Biography (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1960), p. 325.
For a discussion of archetypal animal imagery in Victory, see inter alia John A. Palmer, Joseph Conrad’s Fiction: A Study in Literary Growth (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1968), pp. 174–9.
For a consideration of Jones’s (and Heyst’s) homosexuality, see Jeffrey Meyers, Homosexuality and Literature, 1890–1930 (London: Athlone Press, 1977).
Robert R. Hodges, ‘Deep Fellowship: Homosexuality and Male Bonding in the Life and Fiction of Joseph Conrad’, Journal of Homosexuality, 4:4 (Summer 1979):379–93.
Lionel Trilling, Sincerity and Authenticity (London: Oxford University Press, 1974), pp. 106, 108.
See Edmond Jaloux, ‘Joseph Conrad et le roman d’aventure anglais’, Nouvelle revue française, 12 (1 December 1927):713–19.
Copyright information
© 1991 Otto Bohlmann
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bohlmann, O. (1991). The Quest for Selfhood. In: Conrad’s Existentialism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230374003_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230374003_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38852-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37400-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)