Skip to main content

Part of the book series: St Antony’s Series ((STANTS))

  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

In Chapter 4, the peasant household was examined in terms of its functions: production, human reproduction and consumption. Its consumption function is generally considered definitive, with household membership delimited on the basis of a shared cooking pot. As with all social categories, this standard definition of the household is an over-simplification of reality. It abstracts from the complexity of familial residential relations, giving precedence to consumption over production and human reproduction as well as inferring a relatively static view of the Tanzanian household that obscures the household’s evolution from lineages and clans.1 Nevertheless, the ‘household’ is a useful category, representing a social grouping that is the locus of concrete activities performed on a daily basis involving all of Tanzania’s population. Delineating and defining Tanzania’s other major social institutions is a more difficult task that requires methodological clarification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Feierman documents how the household became the essential social unit during colonialism, replacing the corporate action of the lineage and the still earlier clans (Feierman, S., Concepts of Sovereignty among the Shambaa and their Relation to Political Action, Oxford, D. Phil. Thesis (1972) p. 48).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weber, M., Economy and Society (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968) pp. 956–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1990 Deborah Fahy Bryceson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bryceson, D.F. (1990). Defining Extra-Household Social Institutions. In: Food Insecurity and the Social Division of Labour in Tanzania, 1919–85. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373754_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics