Skip to main content

The Adoption of the Alternative Economic Strategy

  • Chapter
Economic Strategy and the Labour Party

Abstract

After leading in the opinion polls during the campaign, Labour’s defeat in the 1970 general election came as a surprise. One consequence of the result was that the opportunity existed for the party to re-think its economic policy. Many within Labour — not just leftwingers — felt that, given the government’s performance in office, it was essential for such a reappraisal to take place. Immediately after the election, Richard Clements, the editor of Tribune, attacked Labour’s economic record as a central cause of defeat1 Michael Foot talked of the administration’s ‘paralysing financial orthodoxy’.2 The MP Norman Atkinson stated, The one alternative which remains untried is the socialist alternative.’3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Tribune, 26 June 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tribune, 3 July 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tribune, 31 July 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Patrick Seyd, The Rise and Fall of the Labour Left (London, Macmillan, 1987), p. 78.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. See, for example, Jack Jones, Hugh Scanlon and John Forrester (later of Labour’s NEC), LPACR (1970), pp. 114–6, 120–1, 176 and 220–1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Warren Fishbein, Wage Restraint by Consensus (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984), pp. 116–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jack Jones, Union Man (London, Collins, 1986), p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The NEC was defeated by the conference on both issues. See NEC minutes, 27 September 1970 and 30 September 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robert Taylor, The Fifth Estate (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978), pp. 197–228.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See R. Taylor, The Fifth Estate, pp. 199, 212–3, 247–50 and 272.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stephen Bornstein and Peter Gourevitch, ‘Unions in a Declining Economy: the Case of the British TUC’, in Peter Gourevitch et al, Unions and Economic Crisis (London, George Allen and Unwin, 1984), pp. 13–88, pp. 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See, for example, Ken Coates and Tony Topham, The New Unionism (London, Peter Owen, Penguin, 1972);

    Google Scholar 

  13. and Ken Coates, ‘Converting the Unions to Socialism’, in Michael Barratt Brown and Ken Coates (eds), Trade Union Register, 3 (1973), pp. 9–46.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Samuel Finer, The Changing British Party System (Washington, AEI, 1980), p. 114. Patrick Seyd estimates that there were 14 Leftwingers on the NEC in 1973; The Rise and Fall of the Labour Left, p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ian Mikardo, Back-bencher (London, Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1988), pp. 182–3.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Jad Adams, Tony Benn (London, Macmillan, 1992), pp. 312–37;

    Google Scholar 

  17. and Robert Jenkins, Tony Benn (London, Writers and Readers, 1980), pp. 151–94.

    Google Scholar 

  18. LPACR (1970), p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Many PLP and shadow cabinet meetings were dominated by the European issue and how Labour should respond. See PLP minutes and PC minutes 1970–1972.

    Google Scholar 

  20. NEC minutes, 28 October 1970 and 25 November 1970; and RD: 12/September 1970, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ‘The Need for Standing Advisory or Sub-Committees’, RD: 26/November 1970; HPC minutes, 9 November 1970; Michael Hatfield, The House the Left Built (London, Victor Gollancz, 1978), p. 42;

    Google Scholar 

  22. and William Stallard, ‘The Labour Party in Opposition and Government 1970–1979’ (University of Keele PhD thesis, 1985), pp. 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  23. RD: 47/January 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  24. RD: 5/July 1970; M. Hatfield, The House the Left Built, pp. 34–6; and W. Stallard, ‘The Labour Party in Opposition and Government 1970–1979’, pp. 97–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. RD: 5/July 1970, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  26. RD: 47/January 1971, pp. 2–3; RD: 94/April 1971; and IPSC minutes, 28 April 1971 and 18 May 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Michael Meacher, ‘Interview’, Politics and Power, 2 (1980), pp. 5–14, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Peter Shore, Leading the Left (London, Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1993), p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  29. The Times, 5 July 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  30. FEASC minutes, 29 April 1971, 15 June 1971, and 14 December 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  31. ‘The Public Sector’, RD: 216/December 1971; IPSC minutes, 21 December 1971; Phillip Whitehead, The Writing on the Wall (London, Michael Joseph, 1985), p. 120; and M. Hatfield, The House the Left Built, pp. 88–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. PSG minutes, 25 January 1972. Holland was coopted at the second meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Holland and R. Pryke, ‘A State Holding Company’, RD: 271/February 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  34. IPSC minutes, 21 March 1972; and M. Hatfield, The House the Left Built, pp. 121–5.

    Google Scholar 

  35. IPSC minutes, 5 April 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Labour party, Labour’s Programme for Britain (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  37. RD: 336/April 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  38. IPSC minutes, 25 April 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  39. IPSC minutes, 18 April 1972, and 25 April 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  40. The Times, 16 November 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sunday Express, quoted by Tribune, 17 July 1970; and Anthony Crosland, ‘Policies for the People, by the People’, Socialist Commentary (November 1971), pp. 3–5. See also M. Hatfield, The House the Left Built, p. 51; and W. Stallard, ‘The Labour Party in Opposition and Government 1970–1979’, pp. 122 and 155.

    Google Scholar 

  42. See Crosland papers, 13/24. Dick Leonard wrote in the Foreword to Socialism Now ‘no longer has he the leisure or the freedom to range as widely as his whim takes him’; Anthony Crosland, Socialism Now (London, Jonathan Cape, 1975), p. 10. See also NEC minutes, 30 May 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Quoted by M. Hatfield, The House the Left Built, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  44. IPSC minutes; and M. Hatfield, The House the Left Built, pp. 44–5.

    Google Scholar 

  45. The Times, 5 July 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  46. PC minutes, 29 March 1972; and The Times, 11 April 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  47. See Roy Jenkins, A Life at the Centre (London, Macmillan, 1991), pp. 344–53;

    Google Scholar 

  48. and David Owen, Time to Declare (London, Michael Joseph, 1991), pp. 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Denis Healey, The Time of My Life (London, Michael Joseph, 1989), p. 367.

    Google Scholar 

  50. M. Hatfield, The House the Left Built, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Interview, October 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  52. See The Times, 16 September 1971; and Labour Weekly, 29 December 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Speech, 9 December 1972, Crosland papers, 13/24.

    Google Scholar 

  54. NEC minutes, 24 November 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  55. See Martin Sloman, Socialising Public Ownership (London, Macmillan, 1978), pp. 14–15.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. Interview, March 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  57. In Crosland’s absence! IPSC minutes, 31 October 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  58. S. Holland, ‘Planning Strategy, Tactics and Techniques’, RD: 442/October 1972; and S. Holland, ‘The New Economic Imperatives’, RD: 473/November 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  59. IPSC minutes, 28 November 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Interview, David Lipsey, October 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Interview, March 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  62. PSG minutes, 15 March 1973, 29 March 1973, and 10 April 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  63. IPSC minutes, 5 April 1973; and Tony Benn, Against the Tide (London, Hutchinson, 1989), p. 17. See also HPC minutes, 9 April 1973; and NEC minutes, 18 April 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  64. NEC-PC minutes, 16 May 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  65. M. Hatfield, The House the Left Built, pp. 183–6.

    Google Scholar 

  66. The Times, 14–17 May 1973; The Guardian, 14 May 1973; and M. Hatfield, The House the Left Built, pp. 193–5.

    Google Scholar 

  67. The Times, 17 May 1973; and The Guardian, 17 May 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  68. NEC-PC minutes, 16 May 1973, p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  69. The Times, 31 May 1973; M. Hatfield, The House the Left Built, pp. 195–8; and P. Whitehead, The Writing on the Wall, p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  70. NEC minutes, 30 May 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  71. The Times, 1 June 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Benn diary, 7 July 1973. Tony Benn, Parliament, People and Power (London, Verso, 1982), p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  73. P. Shore, Leading the Left, p. 104. See PLP minutes, 11 July 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  74. A. Crosland, ‘The Prospects of Socialism — Nationalisation?’, Encounter, XLI (September 1973), pp. 60–61. The journalist Nora BelofF claimed that his view was shared by the majority of the shadow cabinet, Observer, 4 June 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  75. New Statesman, 8 June 1973, p. 839.

    Google Scholar 

  76. P. Whitehead, The Writing on the Wall, p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  77. The Times, 2 and 4 June 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  78. NEC minutes, 28 September 1973; and The Times, 29 September 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Patrick Cosgrave, The Spectator, 6 October 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Lewis Minkin, The Labour Party Conference (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1980), p. 342.

    Google Scholar 

  81. The Times, 3 October 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  82. W. Fishbein, Wage Restraint by Consensus, pp. 117–20; G. Dorfman, Government Versus Trade Unionism in British Politics since 1968 (London, Macmillan, 1979), pp. 108–12; M. Hatfield, The House the Left Built, pp. 48–9; L. Minkin, The Labour Party Conference, p. 337;

    Google Scholar 

  83. William Stallard, ‘Policy-Making in the Labour Party: the Liaison Committee in Opposition and Government 1970–1979’, Teaching Politics, 16 (1987), pp. 42–55;

    Google Scholar 

  84. and Andrew Taylor, Trade Unions and the Labour Party (London, Croom Helm, 1987), pp. 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  85. See RD: 199/November 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  86. LC minutes, 25 September 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  87. LC minutes, 21 February 1972, 20 March 1972, 22 May 1972, 19 June 1972 and 24 July 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  88. LC minutes, 22 January 1973 and 29 January 1973. See the account given by S. Bornstein and P. Gourevitch, ‘Unions in a Declining Economy: the Case of the British TUC’, pp. 42–45; Jonathan Boston, ‘The Theory and Practice of Voluntary Incomes Policies with Particular Reference to the British Labour Government’s Social Contract 1974–1979’ (Oxford University DPhil thesis, 1983); W. Fishbein, Wage Restraint by Consensus, pp. 117–132; and Andrew Taylor, Trade Unions and the Labour Party, pp. 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  89. See, for example, TUC, Collective Bargaining and the Social Contract (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  90. See, for example, Philip Ziegler’s judgement; Wilson (London, Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1993), p. 392.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Barbara Castle, The Castle Diaries 1974–76 (London, Weidenfield and Nicolson, 1980), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  92. See, for example, David Basnett, ‘Working Out the Social Contract’, Socialist Commentary (October 1974), pp. 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  93. TUC-Labour Party Liaison Committee, Economic Policy and the Cost of Living (1973), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Interview, TUC Official, August 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Ben Pimlott, Harold Wilson (London, Harper Collins, 1992), p. 604.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Interview, TUC Official, August 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  97. S. Bornstein and P. Gourevitch, ‘Unions in a Declining Economy: the Case of the British TUC’, p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  98. M. Meacher, ‘Interview’, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  99. J. Boston, ‘The Theory and Practice of Voluntary Incomes Policies with Particular Reference to the British Labour Government’s Social Contract 1974–1979’, p. 178; and W. Fishbein, Wage Restraint by Consensus, pp. 124 and 131.

    Google Scholar 

  100. LC minutes, 4 January 1974; and B. Castle, The Castle Diaries 1974–76, pp. 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Interview, October 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  102. TUC, Annual Report (1973), pp. 606–7.

    Google Scholar 

  103. See RD: 900/October 1973 on policies of the TGWU; and RD: 897/October 1973 on the GMWU. Both supported public ownership.

    Google Scholar 

  104. RD: 438/October 1972, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Interview, TUC Official, August 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  106. For accounts see P. Whitehead, The Writing on the Wall, pp. 51–98; Martin Holmes, Political Pressure and Economic Policy (London, Butterworth, 1982);

    Google Scholar 

  107. and Colin Leys, Politics in Britain (London, Verso, 1986), pp. 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  108. S. Holland, ‘Planning and Policy Coordination’, RD: 315/March 1972, pp. 6–7; T. Benn, ‘Industrial Power and Industrial Policy’, RD: 722/April 1973; and IPSC minutes, 12 June 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Quoted by R. Jenkins, Tony Benn, p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Benn diary, 9 July 1973; and LPACR (1973), p. 47. An inconclusive Opposition Green Paper was eventually produced proposing nationalisation, although members of the Banking and Insurance Group were dissatisfied with it. See Labour party, Banking and Insurance (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  111. PSG minutes, 2 May 1972 and 15 March 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  112. E. Heffer, ‘Labour’s Policy Making Process’, New Statesman, 1 June 1973, pp. 796–8, p. 798.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Interview, March 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  114. LPACR (1972), p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  115. LPACR (1971), pp. 298 and 300–1.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Coventry Trades Council et al, State Intervention in Industry (Nottingham, Spokesman, 1982), p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  117. S. Bornstein and P. Gourevitch, ‘Unions in a Declining Economy: the Case of the British TUC’, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Minkin qualifies union support for leftwing policies. Most union leaders had other priorities. See The Contentious Alliance Trade Unions and the Labour Party (Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 1991), pp. 165–73.

    Google Scholar 

  119. A. Budd, The Politics of Economic Planning (London, Fontana, 1978), p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  120. M. Hartley Brewer, The Guardian, 3 November 1975,

    Google Scholar 

  121. quoted by S. Wilks, ‘Planning Agreements: the Making of a Paper Tiger’, Public Administration, 59 (1981), pp. 399–421, p. 402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Interview, October 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  123. G. Jones ‘A Left House Built on Sand’, Socialist Commentary (November 1978), pp. 12–13, p. 12. See also B. Pimlott, Harold Wilson, p. 665.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Mark Wickham-Jones

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wickham-Jones, M. (1996). The Adoption of the Alternative Economic Strategy. In: Economic Strategy and the Labour Party. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373679_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics