Advertisement

Mens’ Conditions of Employment and the Division of Childcare Between Parents

  • Irene Bruegel
  • Anne Gray
Part of the The Future of Work Series book series (TFW)

Abstract

It has long been clear that the increase in women’s paid employment has not evoked a compensating increase in the time men spend on childcare (Young and Willmott, 1973; Pilcher, 2000; Gershuny, 2000). Gershuny et al. (1994) suggested that adaptation was delayed in the 1980s by the childhood experience of that generation of parents, whose own parents generally have adopted a traditional sexual division of labour. Today, however, the majority of parents of young children grew up in the 1970s and 1980s, under a rather different domestic regime. Though attitudes have undoubtedly changed and there is good evidence that many men are spending more time with their children (Sullivan, 2000), the gender imbalance continues (O’Brien and Shemilt, 2003).

Keywords

Parental Leave Gender Composition Labour Force Survey Childcare Time Labour Force Survey Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, T., Forth, J., Metcalf, H. and Kirkby, S. (2001) The Gender Pay Gap, London: Cabinet Office; Women and Equality Unit.Google Scholar
  2. Blair-Loy, M. and Wharton, A.S. (2002) ‘Empioyees’ Use of Work—Family Policies and the Workplace Social Context’, Social Forces 80(3): 813–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond, S. and Sales, J. (2001) ‘Household Work in the UK: An analysis of the British Household Panel Survey 1994’, Work Employment and Society 15(2): 233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley, H., Erickson, M., Stephenson, C. and Williams, S. (2000) Myths at Work, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brandth, B. and Kvande, E. (2002) ‘Reflexive Fathers: Negotiating Parental Leave and Working Life’, Gender, Work and Organisation 15(2): 186–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruegel, I. (2001) ‘The Full Monty: The Feminisation of Employment and the unemployment of men’ in Noon, M. and Ogbonna, E., Work and Inequality, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  7. Bruegel, I. (2004) ‘Seeking the Critical Mass: Quantitative and Qualitative Aspects of Feminisation and Management in Britain in the 1990s’, in Stewart, P. (ed.) Employment, Trade Union Revival and the Future of Work, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, M. (2002) ‘Fatherhood, Masculinity and Work in Silicon Valley’ in Gerstel, N. (ed.), Families at Work: Expanding the Bounds, Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cully, M., Woodland, S. and O’Reilly, A. (1999) Britain at Work as depicted by the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Dex, S. and Smith, C. (2001a) Which British employees have access to family-friendly policies? An analysis of the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey, Judge Institute Research Paper No. WP/01, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Fagan, C. (2001) ‘The Temporal Re-organisation of Employment and Household Rhythm of Work Schedules’, American Journal ofBehavioural Science 44(7): 1199–212.Google Scholar
  12. Ferri, E. and Smith, K. (1996) Parenting in the 1990s, London: Family Policy Studies Centre.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, K. and Gershuny, J. (1999) ‘Leisure in the UK across the Twentieth Century’. Working Paper 1999. 03 Institute for Social and Economic Research, Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar
  14. Fried, M. (1999) Taking Time: Parental Leave Policy and Corporate Culture, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gershuny, J., Godwin, M. and Jones, S. (1994) ‘Domestic Revolution a Process of Lagged Adaptation’ in Anderson, M., Bechhofer, F. and Gershuny, J. (eds), The Social and Political Economy of the Household, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gershuny, J. (2000) Changing Times, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Granovetter, M. (1985) ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanson, S. and Pratt, G. (1995) Gender, Work and Space, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harkness, S. (1996) ‘The Gender Earnings gap: Evidence from the UK’, Fiscal Studies 7(2): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harrop, A. and Moss, P. (1995) ‘Trends in Parental Employment’, Work, Employment and Society 9(4): 421–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hochschild, A. (1997) The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work, New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  22. La Valle, I., Arthur, S., Millward, C. and Scott, J. (2002) Happy families? Atypical work and its influence on family life’, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  23. Le Feuvre, N. (1999) ‘Gender, Occupational Feminization and Reflexivity: a Cross National Perspective’ in Crompton, R. (ed.), Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. O’Brien, M. and Shemilt, I. (2003) Working Fathers: Earning and Caring, Manchester: EOC Discussion Series.Google Scholar
  25. Office of National Statistics (2001) Social Focus on Men, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  26. Perrons, D. (2003) ‘The New Economy and the Work-life Balance: Conceptual explorations and a case study of the New Media’, Gender, Work and Organisation 10(1): 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pilcher, J. (2000) ‘The Domestic Division of Labour in the Twentieth Century: Change Slow-a-coming’, Work, Employment and Society 14: 4.Google Scholar
  28. Reskin, B.F., McBrier, D.B. and Kmec, J.A. (1999) ‘The Determinants and Consequences of Workplace Sex and Race Composition’, Annual Review of Sociology 25: 335–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sandberg, J. (1999) ‘The Effects of Family Obligation and Workplace Resources on Men and Women’s Use of Family Leave’ in Hudson, R. and Parcel, T.L. (eds), Research into the Sociology of Work 7: 261–81.Google Scholar
  30. Schor, J. (1991) The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline ofLeisure, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  31. Sullivan, O. (2000) ‘The Division of Domestic Labour: Twenty Years of Change’, Sociology 34(3): 437–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vogler, C. (1994) ‘Segregation Sexism and Labour Supply’ in MacEwen Scott, A. (ed.), Gender Segregation and Social Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Warin, J., Solomon, Y., Lewis, C. and Langford, W. (1999) Fathers, Work and Family Life, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  34. Yeung, W.J., Sandberg, J.F., Davies-Keen, P.E., and Hollerth, S.L. (2001) ‘Children’s time with fathers in intact families’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 63(1): 136–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Young, M. and Willmott, P. (1973) The Symmetrical Family, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Irene Bruegel and Anne Gray 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irene Bruegel
  • Anne Gray

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations