Care Workers and Work—Life Balance: The Example of Domiciliary Careworkers

  • Clare Ungerson
  • Sue Yeandle
Part of the The Future of Work Series book series (TFW)

Abstract

In much of the literature, and in most popular discussion, the term ‘work-life balance’ is used to imply the need for individuals, employers and policy-makers to act to achieve an optimum state, in which each person can achieve a state of equilibrium between two time-consuming and competitive activities: on the one hand, paid work and, on the other, a ‘life’ that contains a wide variety of activities, but, by definition, is not paid work. Although this equilibrium can involve different allocations of time and effort to ‘work’ and ‘life’ by different people, and indeed by the same people at different life stages, the concept implies a dichotomy between ‘work’ for wages or for financial gain, and ‘life’ in which the rewards of activities, effort and commitments are non-monetary.

Keywords

Depression Lime Borated Allo 215t Century 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, B. (2000) Doing the dirty work?: the global politics of domestic labour, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  2. Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1993) Negotiating Family Responsibilities, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fletcher, J.K. and Rapoport, R. (1996) ‘Work-Family Issues as a Catalyst for Organizational Change’, in Lewis, S. and Lewis, J. (eds), The Work-Family Challenge: Rethinkin QEmplovment. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Glucksmann, M. (1995), ‘Why “work”? Gender and the “total social organisation of labour”’, Gender, Work and Organisation, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 63–75.Google Scholar
  5. Harkness, S. (1999) ‘The 24-hour Economy’, Employment Audit No. 11, London: Employment Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Himmelweit, S. (1995), ‘The Discovery of “Unpaid Work”: The Social Consequences of the Expansion of “Work”’, Feminist Economics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  7. Kodz, J., Kersley, B., Strebler, M.T. and O’Regan, S. (1998) Breaking the Long Hours Culture, IES Report No. 352, London: Institute for Employment Studies.Google Scholar
  8. The Work Foundation (2002) Working Capital, London: The Work Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. TUC (1998) The Time of Our Lives: A TUC Report on Working Hours and Flexibility, T,nndon. TTTC.Google Scholar
  10. Ungerson, C. (1987) Policy is Personal: sex, gender and informal care, London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  11. Ungerson, C. (1999) Personal assistants and disabled people: an examination of a hybrid form of work and care, Work, Employment and Society, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 583–600.Google Scholar
  12. Yeandle, S. (2001) ‘Three Sorts of Time’ in Wilson, J. (ed.) Women in the New Economy: a regional perspective, pp. 41–6, London: The Smith Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Yeandle, S., Phillips, J., Scheibl, F., Wigfield, A. and Wise, S. (2003) Line Managers and Family-friendly Employment: Roles and Perspectives, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Clare Ungerson and Sue Yeandle 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clare Ungerson
  • Sue Yeandle

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations