Abstract
In recent years, a debate has emerged, or at least the volume of the debate has increased, regarding the theory and practice of state sovereignty. Sovereignty, which encompasses elements of power and authority has, for at least the last few hundred years, been identified with the territorial state. Traditional views of sovereignty regard these territorial entities as more or less independent and holding the requisite power and authority to provide for the security of the territory and the people within the territory. Some of the outlines and boundaries of sovereignty have been debated, but mainstream international relations discourse has more or less identified state sovereignty as the key reality of international politics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
F.H. Hinsley defines sovereignty as ‘final and absolute authority in the political comunity’. F.H. Hinsley, Sovereignty, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986) p. 125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Kurt Mills
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mills, K. (1998). Introduction. In: Human Rights in the Emerging Global Order. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373556_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373556_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40500-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37355-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)