Abstract
In this chapter, we explore Lacan’s use of knot theory and highlight how this brings him to elaborate a theory in which the subject is thought of as an effect of knotting the registers of the Real, the Symbolic and the Imaginary. In doing so, we review Lacan’s discussion of James Joyce’s life and work. We argue that his suggestion that Joyce created a so-called ‘sinthome’ is most innovative in that it refers to a purely singular and non-universal way of creating connections between the Real, the Symbolic and the Imaginary. As Lacan’s knot-theoretical model provides a most valuable tool for further reflection we illustrate its usefulness by introducing the case of David Nebreda, a Spanish photographer who severely mutilated his body and took pictures of it, which he called ‘photographic doubles’. These photographic doubles are a singular invention by means of which the artist gains subjective consistency as well as access to shared discourse. To conclude we address the social and political implications of Lacan’s later theory on the subject. However, first we provide an overview of how Lacan’s use of knot theory fits within his conception of the subject.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Badiou, A. (2009). Pocket Pantheon. London and New York: Verso.
Borch-Jacobsen, M. (1991). Lacan: The Absolute Master. Stanford University Press.
Curnier, J.-P. and Surya, M. (2001). Sur David Nebreda. Paris: Éditions Léo Scheer.
Freud, S. (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams, SE, vols 4–5.
Guillo, A. (2002). ‘J’espère que mon travail sera toujours innocent.’ Entretien avec David Nebreda. La Voix du regard, 15, 72–7.
Jones, D. H. (2005). The body eclectic: Viewing bodily modifications in David Nebreda. Reconstruction: Studies in Contemporary Culture, 5(1): >http://reconstruction.eserver.org/051/contents.shtml, accessed 7 November 2010.
Joyce, J. (1965). A Portrait of the Artist as A Young Man. Harmondsworth: Pengu in Books.
Lacan, J. ([1957a] 2006). Seminar on the purloined letter. In Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English, trans. B. Fink. New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 11–48.
Lacan, J. ([1957b] 2006 ). The instance of the letter in the unconscious or reason since Freud. In Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English, trans. B. Fink. New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 412–42.
Lacan, J. ([1957–58] 1998 ). Le Séminaire, Livre V, Les Formations de l’inconscient. Paris: Seuil.
Lacan, J. ([1959] 2006 ). On a question prior to any possible treatment of psychosis. In Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English, trans. B. Fink. New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 445–88.
Lacan, J. ([1960] 2006 ). The subversion of the subject and the dialectic of desire in the Freudian unconscious. In Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English, trans. B. Fink. New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 671–702.
Lacan, J. ([1962–63]2004). Le Séminaire, Livre X, L’Angoisse. Paris: Seuil.
Lacan, J. ([1963] 2005). Introduction au Noms-du-Père. In Des Noms-du-Père. Paris: Seuil, pp. 67–104.
Lacan, J. ([1964] 2004 ). The Seminar, Book XI, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
Lacan, J. ([1975–76] 2005 ). Le Séminaire, Livre XXIII, Le Sinthome. Paris: Seuil.
Miller, J.-A. (1993). Clinique ironique. La Cause Freudienne, 23, 7–13.
Miller, J.-A. (2004). L’Invention psychotique. Quarto, 80 /81, 6–13.
Miller, J.-A. (2007). La Passe bis. La Cause Freudienne, 66, 209–13.
Millet, C. (2000). David Nebreda et le double photographique. Entretien avec Catherine Millet. Art Press, 255, 49–55.
Nebreda, D. (2000). Autoportraits. Paris: Éditions Léo Scheer.
Nebreda, D. (2004). Chapitre sur les petites amputations. Paris: Éditions Léo Scheer.
Nebreda, D. (2006). Sur la révélation. Paris: Éditions Léo Scheer.
Parker, I. (2003). Jacques Lacan, barred psychologist. Theory and Psychology, 13, 95–115.
Roustang, F. (1990). The Lacanian Delusion. Oxford University Press.
Saussure, F. de (1916). Course in General Linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.
Sokal, A. and Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable Nonsense. New York: Picador.
Vanheule, S. (2011). The Subject of Psychosis: A Lacanian Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vanheule, S. and Verhaeghe, P. (2009). Identity through a psychoanalytic looking glass. Theory and Psychology, 19, 319–411.
Verhaeghe, P. (2004). On Being Normal and Other Disorders. New York: Other Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Stijn Vanheule and Abe Geldhof
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vanheule, S., Geldhof, A. (2012). Knotted Subjectivity: On Lacan’s Use of Knot Theory in Building a Non-universal Theory of the Subject. In: Gülerce, A. (eds) Re(con)figuring Psychoanalysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373303_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373303_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33309-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37330-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)