Abstract
Does rational economic man have a family life? It is difficult to imagine this ‘…lightning calculator of pleasures and pains, who oscillates like a homogeneous globule of desire of happiness…’ (Veblen, 1919: 73–4) wearing slippers, playing with his children or taking out the garbage. Yet the family is an important economic institution enabling consumers to produce their own utility or satisfaction, using as inputs both purchased and homemade goods and constrained by time. Its organization is crucial to understanding market exchange. To take a pertinent example, the unequal division of domestic responsibilities has long been recognized as disadvantaging women in paid work. Women come to the labour market burdened down with domestic baggage. This is the common sense which Becker, doyen of the New Household Economics, has dressed up in formal mathematics. It is a common sense which can be readily supported by references to married women’s earnings in comparison with single women’s earnings, or, more dramatically, with reference to mothers’ earnings in comparison with the earnings of women who have no children (Polachek, 1975; Joshi, 1987; Blau and Khan, 1992; Joshi, Paci and Waldfogel, 1998). Not surprisingly, therefore, feminist economics has as one of its core demands that economic analysis should take account of the social division of labour as a whole including domestic labour (Gardiner, 1997).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Arrow, K. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values. Chapman & Hall.
Becker, G. S. (1964) Human Capital. Columbia University Press.
Becker, G. S. (1974) ‘A Theory of Marriage: Part II’, Journal of Political Economy, 82(2): S11–12.
Becker, G. S. (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour. University of Chicago Press.
Becker, G. S. (1981) A Treatise on the Family. Harvard University Press.
Becker, G. S. (1985) ‘Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor’, Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1): S33–58.
Becker, G. S., G. M. Landes and R. T. Michael (1977) ‘An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability’, Journal of Political Economy, 85(6): 1141–87.
Bergmann, B. R. (1987) ‘The Task of a Feminist Economics: a More Equitable Future’, in C. Farnham (ed.), The Impact of Feminist Research in the Academy. Indiana University Press.
Bettio, F. (1996) ‘Position of Women in the Italian Economy’, paper presented at the ESRC conference, European Perspectives on Changing Labour Markets and Equal Opportunities, London, May.
Bettio, F. and P. Villa, (1998) ‘A Mediterranean perspective on the breakdown of the relationship between participation and fertility’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(2), 137–71.
Blau, F. and M. A. Ferber (1986) The Economics of Women, Men and Work. Prentice Hall.
Blau, F. and L. Khan (1992) ‘The Gender Earnings Gap: Learning from International Comparisons’, American Economic Review, 82(2): 533–8.
Boserup, E. (1987) ‘Inequality Between the Sexes’, in J. Eatwell et al. (eds), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 2. Macmillan: 824–7.
Bruegel, I. and D. Perrons (1995) ‘Where Do the Costs of Unequal Treatment for Women Fall? An Analysis of the Incidence of the Costs of Unequal Pay and Sex Discrimination in the UK’, in J. Humphries and J. Rubery (eds), The Economics of Equal Opportunities: Equal Opportunities Commission: 155–74.
Charles, N. (1993) Gender Divisions and Social Change. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Creighton, C. (1996) ‘The “Family Wage ”as a Class-Rational Strategy’, Sociological Review, 44(2): 204–24.
Davies, H. and H. Joshi (1995) ‘Social and Family Security in the Redress of Unequal Opportunities’, in J. Humphries and J. Rubery (eds), The Economics of Equal Opportunities. Equal Opportunities Commission.
Eggertsson, T. (1990) Economic Behaviour and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ehrenberg, R. G. and R. S. Smith (1991) Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy. Scott, Foresman.
Elson, D. (1995) ‘Comment’, in E. Kuiper and J. Sap (eds), Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics. Routledge: 298.
England, P. (1989) ‘A Feminist Critique of Rational Choice Theories: Implications for Sociology’, American Sociologist, 20(1): 14–28.
Feiner, S. F. and B. Roberts (1990) ‘Hidden by the Invisible Hand: Neoclassical Economic Theory and the Textbook Treatment of Race and Gender’, Gender and Society, 4: 159–81.
Ferber, M. A. and B. G. Birnbaum (1977) ‘The “New Home Economics”: Retrospects and Prospects’, Journal of Consumer Research, 4: 19–28.
Ferber, M. A. and H. M. Lowry (1976) ‘The Sex Differential in Earnings: A Reappraisal’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 29: 377–87.
Fine, B. (1992) Women’s Employment and the Capitalist Family. London: Routledge.
Folbre, N. (1982) ‘Exploitation Comes Home: a Critique of the Marxian Theory of Family Labour’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6(4): 317–29.
Folbre, N. (1994) Who Pays for the Kids: Gender and the Structures of Constraint. Routledge.
Folbre, N. and H. Hartmann (1988) ‘The Rhetoric of Self-Interest: Ideology of Gender in Economic Theory’, in A. Klamer, D. N. McCloskey and R. M. Solow (eds), The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 184–203.
Frank, R. (1988) Passions within Reason. The Strategic Role of the Emotions. Norton.
Gardiner, J. (1997) Gender, Care and Economics. Routledge.
Gardiner, J., S. Himmelweit and M. Mackintosh (1975) ‘Women’s Domestic Labour’, Bulletin of the Conference of Socialist Economists, 4(11): 1–11.
Granovetter, M. (1985) ‘Economic Action, Social Structure and Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 93(3): 481–510.
Hammond, P. (1987) ‘Altruism’, in J. Eatwell et al. (eds), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 1. Macmillan: 85–6.
Hartmann, H. (1979) ‘The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union’, Capital and Class, 8: 1–33.
Himmelweit, S. and S. Mohun, (1977) ‘Domestic Labour and Capital’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1(1): 15–31.
Hirschleifer, J. (1985) ‘The Expanding Domain of Economics’, American Economic Review, 75(6): 53–68.
Holtermann, S. (1995) ‘The Costs and Benefits to British Employers of Measures to Promote Equality of Opportunity’, in J. Humphries and J. Rubery (eds), The Economics of Equal Opportunities. Equal Opportunities Commission: 137–54.
Humphries, J. (1977) ‘Class Struggle and the Persistance of the Working Class Family’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1(3): 241–58.
Humphries, J. (1982) ‘Review of “A Treatise on the Family”, by Gary S. Becker’, Economic Journal, 92(374): 739–40.
Humphries, J. (1995) ‘Economics, Gender and Equal Opportunities’, in J. Humphries and J. Rubery (eds), The Economics of Equal Opportunities. Equal Opportunities Commission: 55–86.
Humphries, J. (1991) ‘The sexual division of labour and social control: An interpretation’, Review of Radical Political Economics, vol. 23(3–4): 269–96.
Humphries, J. and J. Rubery (1984) ‘The Reconstitution of the Supply Side of the Labour Market: The Relative Autonomy of Social Reproduction’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8(4): 331–46.
Humphries, J. and J. Rubery (eds) (1995) The Economics of Equal Opportunities. Equal Opportunities Commission.
Joshi, H. (1987) ‘The Cost of Caring’ in C. Glendenning and J. Millar (eds), Women and Poverty in Britain. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books: 112–33.
Joshi, H. E. (1991) ‘Sex and Motherhood as Sources of Women’s Economic Disadvantage’, in D. Groves and M. Maclean (eds), Women’s Issues in Social Policy. Routledge: 179–93.
Joshi, H. and P. Paci with Gerald Makepeace and J. Waldfogel, Unequal Pay For Women And Men. Evidence From the British Birth Cohort Studies, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass 1998.
Killingsworth, M. R. and J. J. Heckman (1986) ‘Female Labor Supply’, in O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. I. North Holland.
Laufer, J. (1998) ‘Equal Opportunity between Men and Women: The Case of France’, Feminist Economics, 4(1): 53–70.
Lawson, T. (1997) Economics and Reality. Routledge.
Lundberg, S. and R. A. Pollak (1993) Separate Spheres, Bargaining and the Marriage Market, Journal of Political Economy, 101(6): 988–1010.
McElroy, M. B. and M. J. Horney (1981) ‘Nash-Bargained Household Decision: Towards a Generalization of the Theory of Demand’, International Economic Review, 22(2): 333–49.
Madigan, K. (1997) ‘ “Family ”Doesn’t Always Mean Children’, Business Week, 15 September: 104.
Main, B. G. M. (1993) ‘Where “Equal ”Equals “Not Equal”: Women in the Labour Market’, in Sex Equality: Law and Economics, Hume Papers on Public Policy, 1(1): 22–39.
Manser, M. and M. Brown (1980) ‘Marriage and Household Decision-Making: A Bargaining Analysis’, International Economic Review, 21(1): 31–44.
Mincer, J. and S. W. Polachek (1974) ‘Family Investments in Human Capital: Earnings of Women’, Journal of Political Economy, 82(2): S76–108.
Nelson, J. A. (1992) ‘Gender, Metaphor, and the Definition of Economics’, Economics and Philosophy, 8(1): 103–26.
North, D. (1981) Structural Change in Economic History. Norton.
Ott, N. (1992) Intrafamily Bargaining and Household Decisions. Springer.
Ott, N. (1995) ‘Fertility and Division of Work in the Family’, in E. Kuiper and J. Sap (eds), Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics. Routledge: 80–99.
Polachek, S. W. (1975) ‘Potential Biases in Measuring Male–Female Discrimination’, Journal of Human Resources, 10(2): 205–29.
Polachek, S. W. (1995) ‘Human Capital and the Gender Earnings Gap’, in E. Kuiper and J. Sap (eds), Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics. Routledge: 61–79.
Pollak, R. A. (1985) ‘A Transactions Cost Approach to Families and Households’, Journal of Economic Literature, xxiii(2): 581–608.
Rowbotham, S. (1990) The Past is Before Us, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Samuelson, P. (1956) ‘Social Indifference Curves’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1): 1–22.
Seiz, J. A. (1991) ‘The Bargaining Approach and Feminist Methodology’, Review of Radical Political Economy, 23: 22–9.
Selten, R. and W. Guth (1982) ‘Game Theoretical Analysis of Wage Bargaining in a Simple Business Cycle Model’, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 10: 177–95.
Siebert, W. S. (1996) ‘Review Article on The Economics of Equal Opportunities’, Economic Affairs, Summer: 45–7.
Stiglitz, J. E. (1987) ‘Principal and Agent’, in J. Eatwell et al. (eds), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 3. Macmillan: 966–71.
Strassmann, D. (1993) ‘Not a Free Market: The Rhetoric of Disciplinary Authority in Economics’, in M. A. Ferber and J. A. Nelson (eds), Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago University Press.
Trzcinski, E. (1995) ‘The Use and Abuse of Neoclassical Theory in the Political Arena’, in E. Kuiper and J. Sap (eds), Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics. Routledge: 231–48.
Veblen, T. (1919) The Place of Science in Modern Civilization, New York: B. W. Huebsch.
Walby, S. (1986) Patriarchy at Work. Oxford: Polity.
Winter, S. G. (1987) ‘Natural Selection and Evolution’, in J. Eatwell et al. (eds), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 2. Macmillan: 614–17.
Woolley, F. R. (1993) ‘The Feminist Challenge to Neoclassical Economics’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 17(1): 485–500.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Humphries, J. (2000). Rational Economic Families? Economics, the Family and the Economy. In: Cook, J., Roberts, J., Waylen, G. (eds) Towards a Gendered Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373150_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373150_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-74872-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37315-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)