Skip to main content

Rational Economic Families? Economics, the Family and the Economy

  • Chapter
Towards a Gendered Political Economy

Abstract

Does rational economic man have a family life? It is difficult to imagine this ‘…lightning calculator of pleasures and pains, who oscillates like a homogeneous globule of desire of happiness…’ (Veblen, 1919: 73–4) wearing slippers, playing with his children or taking out the garbage. Yet the family is an important economic institution enabling consumers to produce their own utility or satisfaction, using as inputs both purchased and homemade goods and constrained by time. Its organization is crucial to understanding market exchange. To take a pertinent example, the unequal division of domestic responsibilities has long been recognized as disadvantaging women in paid work. Women come to the labour market burdened down with domestic baggage. This is the common sense which Becker, doyen of the New Household Economics, has dressed up in formal mathematics. It is a common sense which can be readily supported by references to married women’s earnings in comparison with single women’s earnings, or, more dramatically, with reference to mothers’ earnings in comparison with the earnings of women who have no children (Polachek, 1975; Joshi, 1987; Blau and Khan, 1992; Joshi, Paci and Waldfogel, 1998). Not surprisingly, therefore, feminist economics has as one of its core demands that economic analysis should take account of the social division of labour as a whole including domestic labour (Gardiner, 1997).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Arrow, K. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values. Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1964) Human Capital. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1974) ‘A Theory of Marriage: Part II’, Journal of Political Economy, 82(2): S11–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1981) A Treatise on the Family. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1985) ‘Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor’, Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1): S33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S., G. M. Landes and R. T. Michael (1977) ‘An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability’, Journal of Political Economy, 85(6): 1141–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, B. R. (1987) ‘The Task of a Feminist Economics: a More Equitable Future’, in C. Farnham (ed.), The Impact of Feminist Research in the Academy. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettio, F. (1996) ‘Position of Women in the Italian Economy’, paper presented at the ESRC conference, European Perspectives on Changing Labour Markets and Equal Opportunities, London, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettio, F. and P. Villa, (1998) ‘A Mediterranean perspective on the breakdown of the relationship between participation and fertility’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(2), 137–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F. and M. A. Ferber (1986) The Economics of Women, Men and Work. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F. and L. Khan (1992) ‘The Gender Earnings Gap: Learning from International Comparisons’, American Economic Review, 82(2): 533–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1987) ‘Inequality Between the Sexes’, in J. Eatwell et al. (eds), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 2. Macmillan: 824–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruegel, I. and D. Perrons (1995) ‘Where Do the Costs of Unequal Treatment for Women Fall? An Analysis of the Incidence of the Costs of Unequal Pay and Sex Discrimination in the UK’, in J. Humphries and J. Rubery (eds), The Economics of Equal Opportunities: Equal Opportunities Commission: 155–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, N. (1993) Gender Divisions and Social Change. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, C. (1996) ‘The “Family Wage ”as a Class-Rational Strategy’, Sociological Review, 44(2): 204–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, H. and H. Joshi (1995) ‘Social and Family Security in the Redress of Unequal Opportunities’, in J. Humphries and J. Rubery (eds), The Economics of Equal Opportunities. Equal Opportunities Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, T. (1990) Economic Behaviour and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G. and R. S. Smith (1991) Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy. Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson, D. (1995) ‘Comment’, in E. Kuiper and J. Sap (eds), Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics. Routledge: 298.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P. (1989) ‘A Feminist Critique of Rational Choice Theories: Implications for Sociology’, American Sociologist, 20(1): 14–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feiner, S. F. and B. Roberts (1990) ‘Hidden by the Invisible Hand: Neoclassical Economic Theory and the Textbook Treatment of Race and Gender’, Gender and Society, 4: 159–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, M. A. and B. G. Birnbaum (1977) ‘The “New Home Economics”: Retrospects and Prospects’, Journal of Consumer Research, 4: 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, M. A. and H. M. Lowry (1976) ‘The Sex Differential in Earnings: A Reappraisal’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 29: 377–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. (1992) Women’s Employment and the Capitalist Family. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (1982) ‘Exploitation Comes Home: a Critique of the Marxian Theory of Family Labour’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6(4): 317–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (1994) Who Pays for the Kids: Gender and the Structures of Constraint. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. and H. Hartmann (1988) ‘The Rhetoric of Self-Interest: Ideology of Gender in Economic Theory’, in A. Klamer, D. N. McCloskey and R. M. Solow (eds), The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 184–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (1988) Passions within Reason. The Strategic Role of the Emotions. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, J. (1997) Gender, Care and Economics. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, J., S. Himmelweit and M. Mackintosh (1975) ‘Women’s Domestic Labour’, Bulletin of the Conference of Socialist Economists, 4(11): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985) ‘Economic Action, Social Structure and Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 93(3): 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. (1987) ‘Altruism’, in J. Eatwell et al. (eds), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 1. Macmillan: 85–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H. (1979) ‘The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union’, Capital and Class, 8: 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelweit, S. and S. Mohun, (1977) ‘Domestic Labour and Capital’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1(1): 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschleifer, J. (1985) ‘The Expanding Domain of Economics’, American Economic Review, 75(6): 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtermann, S. (1995) ‘The Costs and Benefits to British Employers of Measures to Promote Equality of Opportunity’, in J. Humphries and J. Rubery (eds), The Economics of Equal Opportunities. Equal Opportunities Commission: 137–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, J. (1977) ‘Class Struggle and the Persistance of the Working Class Family’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1(3): 241–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, J. (1982) ‘Review of “A Treatise on the Family”, by Gary S. Becker’, Economic Journal, 92(374): 739–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, J. (1995) ‘Economics, Gender and Equal Opportunities’, in J. Humphries and J. Rubery (eds), The Economics of Equal Opportunities. Equal Opportunities Commission: 55–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, J. (1991) ‘The sexual division of labour and social control: An interpretation’, Review of Radical Political Economics, vol. 23(3–4): 269–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, J. and J. Rubery (1984) ‘The Reconstitution of the Supply Side of the Labour Market: The Relative Autonomy of Social Reproduction’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8(4): 331–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, J. and J. Rubery (eds) (1995) The Economics of Equal Opportunities. Equal Opportunities Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, H. (1987) ‘The Cost of Caring’ in C. Glendenning and J. Millar (eds), Women and Poverty in Britain. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books: 112–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, H. E. (1991) ‘Sex and Motherhood as Sources of Women’s Economic Disadvantage’, in D. Groves and M. Maclean (eds), Women’s Issues in Social Policy. Routledge: 179–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, H. and P. Paci with Gerald Makepeace and J. Waldfogel, Unequal Pay For Women And Men. Evidence From the British Birth Cohort Studies, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killingsworth, M. R. and J. J. Heckman (1986) ‘Female Labor Supply’, in O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. I. North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, J. (1998) ‘Equal Opportunity between Men and Women: The Case of France’, Feminist Economics, 4(1): 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. (1997) Economics and Reality. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S. and R. A. Pollak (1993) Separate Spheres, Bargaining and the Marriage Market, Journal of Political Economy, 101(6): 988–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, M. B. and M. J. Horney (1981) ‘Nash-Bargained Household Decision: Towards a Generalization of the Theory of Demand’, International Economic Review, 22(2): 333–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madigan, K. (1997) ‘ “Family ”Doesn’t Always Mean Children’, Business Week, 15 September: 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, B. G. M. (1993) ‘Where “Equal ”Equals “Not Equal”: Women in the Labour Market’, in Sex Equality: Law and Economics, Hume Papers on Public Policy, 1(1): 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manser, M. and M. Brown (1980) ‘Marriage and Household Decision-Making: A Bargaining Analysis’, International Economic Review, 21(1): 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. and S. W. Polachek (1974) ‘Family Investments in Human Capital: Earnings of Women’, Journal of Political Economy, 82(2): S76–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. A. (1992) ‘Gender, Metaphor, and the Definition of Economics’, Economics and Philosophy, 8(1): 103–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1981) Structural Change in Economic History. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, N. (1992) Intrafamily Bargaining and Household Decisions. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, N. (1995) ‘Fertility and Division of Work in the Family’, in E. Kuiper and J. Sap (eds), Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics. Routledge: 80–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polachek, S. W. (1975) ‘Potential Biases in Measuring Male–Female Discrimination’, Journal of Human Resources, 10(2): 205–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polachek, S. W. (1995) ‘Human Capital and the Gender Earnings Gap’, in E. Kuiper and J. Sap (eds), Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics. Routledge: 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A. (1985) ‘A Transactions Cost Approach to Families and Households’, Journal of Economic Literature, xxiii(2): 581–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowbotham, S. (1990) The Past is Before Us, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1956) ‘Social Indifference Curves’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiz, J. A. (1991) ‘The Bargaining Approach and Feminist Methodology’, Review of Radical Political Economy, 23: 22–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. and W. Guth (1982) ‘Game Theoretical Analysis of Wage Bargaining in a Simple Business Cycle Model’, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 10: 177–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, W. S. (1996) ‘Review Article on The Economics of Equal Opportunities’, Economic Affairs, Summer: 45–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1987) ‘Principal and Agent’, in J. Eatwell et al. (eds), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 3. Macmillan: 966–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann, D. (1993) ‘Not a Free Market: The Rhetoric of Disciplinary Authority in Economics’, in M. A. Ferber and J. A. Nelson (eds), Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trzcinski, E. (1995) ‘The Use and Abuse of Neoclassical Theory in the Political Arena’, in E. Kuiper and J. Sap (eds), Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics. Routledge: 231–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1919) The Place of Science in Modern Civilization, New York: B. W. Huebsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (1986) Patriarchy at Work. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G. (1987) ‘Natural Selection and Evolution’, in J. Eatwell et al. (eds), The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, vol. 2. Macmillan: 614–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, F. R. (1993) ‘The Feminist Challenge to Neoclassical Economics’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 17(1): 485–500.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Humphries, J. (2000). Rational Economic Families? Economics, the Family and the Economy. In: Cook, J., Roberts, J., Waylen, G. (eds) Towards a Gendered Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373150_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics