Abstract
Postmodern and objectivist theories share a traditional but unhelpful assumption about fictions. They assume that fictions and the real occupy different and antithetical spaces, disposed one above or over the other. For both objectivist and postmodern theory, fictions are fashioned and feigned symbolic constructs which are essentially ‘at variance with fact’ (OED) and ‘not real’ (Littrt). And for both kinds of theory, language is either factual in the sense that it is a true and adequate duplication of reality, or fictional in that it does not speak the real. The difference between objectivist and postmodern theories here is largely a matter of where the line between fact and fiction is drawn. Objectivist theories generally hold that the line falls between different ways of employing language, and that they can determine which discourses are factual and which are fictional.
Mixture, not homogeneity, governs textual matters.
Thomas Pavel
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1993 Eve Tavor Bannet
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bannet, E.T. (1993). Factitive Fictions and Possible Worlds. In: Postcultural Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373143_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373143_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38994-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37314-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)