Abstract
Shakespeare’s last four plays have always defied easy generic pigeonholing, for elements of both comedy and tragedy are deeply rooted in them: The Winter’s Tale ends in reconciliation and marriage, but it is irrevocably shadowed by the death of its teller Mamilius; Prospero renounces his art and thinks of his grave; Cymbeline finds his sons but loses his queen; and Pericles regains his family only after years of grief and isolation. In blending these two genres, Shakespeare may seem to owe something to the increasingly flourishing art of Beaumont and Fletcher, as exemplified in plays like The Maid’s Tragedy, A King and No King and Philaster; but there are also clear differences. Beaumont and Fletcher’s tragi-comedies characteristically combine a cracking pace, much use of disguise, mistaken identity and cross-dressing, and a wildly unpredictable plot, structured by dramatic and unexpected reversals of fortune and, often, of attitude. An audience may be consistently surprised and amused, and may often admire the ingenuity and the political daring of many of the plot developments, but it is very rarely moved. Indeed, there is a sense in which Fletcher’s own definition of his preferred tragi-comic form as offering ‘the danger, not the death’ precludes any significant emotional response: if we know that danger will always be averted, we are, in effect, in much the same fantasy mode as that inhabited by Batman or Indiana Jones.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
William Shakespeare, The Winter’s Tale, ed. J.H.P. Pafford [1966] (London: Routledge, 1988), I.II.1–3. All further quotations from the play will be taken from this edition and reference will be given in the text.
For a rather different view of the relationship between Paulina and St Paul, see Dorothea Kehler, ‘Shakespeare’s Emilias and the Politics of Celibacy’, in In Another Country: Feminist Perspectives on Renaissance Drama, ed. Dorothea Kehler and Susan Baker (Metuchen, NJ and London: The Scarecrow Press, 1991), pp. 137–56, p. 165.
Carol Thomas Neely, Broken Nuptials in Shakespeare’s Plays, 2nd edition ( Urbana, IL: Illini Books, 1993 ), p. 209.
William Shakespeare, Cymbeline, ed. J.M. Nosworthy (London: Methuen, 1965), I.I.17–18. All further quotations from the play will be taken from this edition and reference will be given in the text.
Diane Elizabeth Dreher, Domination and Defiance: Fathers and Daughters in Shakespeare ( Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1986 ), p. 48.
William Shakespeare, Pericles, ed. F.D. Hoeniger (London: Methuen, 1963), Act I Chorus, 21–2. All further quotations from the play will be taken from this edition and reference will be given in the text.
See A.D. Wraight and Virginia F. Stern, In Search of Christopher Marlowe, 2nd edition (Chichester: Adam Hart, 1993 ), p. 308.
On her absence, see Stephen Orgel, ‘Prospero’s Wife’, in Rewriting the Renaissance, ed. Margaret W. Ferguson, Maureen Quilligan, and Nancy J. Vickers (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), pp. 50–64, esp. pp. 51 and 54.
See William Shakespeare, The Tempest, ed. Anne Righter (Anne Barton) (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968), I.2.349–51. All further quotations from the play will be taken from this edition and reference will be given in the text.
For comment on this, see Jeanne Addison Roberts, ‘Shakespeare’s Maimed Birth Rites’, in True Rites and Maimed Rites: Ritual and Anti-Ritual in Shakespeare and His Age, ed. Linda Woodbridge and Edward Berry (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1992), pp. 123–44, p.134.
William Shakespeare and John Fletcher, The Two Noble Kinsmen, ed. N.W. Bawcutt (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977), Prologue, 1–10. All further quotations from the play will be taken from this edition and reference will be given in the text.
William Shakespeare, Henry VIII, ed. A.R. Humphreys (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971), I.I.76. All further quotations from the play will be taken from this edition and reference will be given in the text.
On the print metaphor, see Stevie Davies, The Idea of Woman in Renaissance Literature ( Brighton: Harvester, 1986 ), p. 108;
Richard Wilson, Will Power ( Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993 ), p. 165;
Terence Hawkes, Meaning by Shakespeare ( London: Routledge, 1992 ), p. 23;
Ann Thompson, ‘“The warrant of womanhood”: Shakespeare and Feminist Criticism’, in The Shakespeare Myth, ed. Graham Holderness (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988), pp. 74–88, p. 85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Lisa Hopkins
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hopkins, L. (1998). The Wedding of the Daughter: Marriage in the Last Plays. In: The Shakespearean Marriage. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373037_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230373037_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39612-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37303-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)