Skip to main content
  • 32 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter seeks to define the generic issue implicit in my concentration thus far on tragedies and explicit in the emergence of aphanitic subjectivity as tragically coded. I also want to caution against turning a discursive effect into a marker of ‘psychological complexity’ or ‘realism’. A shift of generic perspective may usefully refocus the discourses of subjectivity as such, paradoxically by siting them at the crossroads of two basic formalist precepts regarding plot and characterization. These are the principles (to put them reductively) that tragedy kills off its main characters, while comedy does not, and that comedy, unlike tragedy, subordinates character-psychology to social pattern, the individual to the group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Richard Hillman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hillman, R. (1997). Some Comic and Tragicomic Subjects. In: Self-Speaking in Medieval and Early Modern English Drama. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372894_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics