Abstract
The notion of a ‘quest for truth’ prompted contradictory responses. Inherent in the concept was the notion which emerged in the nineteenth century that truth resided in the process of open-ended inquiry, for that process reflected the reality of mind and world. Solutions were not to be found.2 Yet ‘quest’ alternatively implied an attainable goal, and thence derived systems which initially defined the knowing process, and explored the implications that definition had for private and public issues. The rejection of doctrinaire eighteenth-century philosophy spawned both scepticism and new, dogmatic systems, and the attraction of Mill and Carlyle to Saint-Simonianism shows this movement in action. Likewise, Marian Evans was to oscillate between the views that truth resided within process or within system: the examples of Mill and Carlyle prompted her consideration of the problem, and her final assent to the view of truth as process led her to literature as the genre which could best express this hard-won philosophical position, and encourage others to adopt it.
To have been hurried by a generous enthusiasm into any vagaries, however strange or absurd, does no permanent injury to any man’s reputation or prospects in life, when once the delusion is over.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
James Joll, The Anarchists (1964) p. 53; Markham, Social Organisation p. 40.
Charles Gide and Charles Rist, Histoire des doctrines économiques depuis les physiocrates jusqu’à nos jours (Paris, 1922) p. 264.
John Bowle, Politics and Opinion in the Nineteenth Century (1954) pp. 102–3; Joll, The Anarchists p. 57.
J. L. and Barbara Hammond, The Age of the Chartists (1930; Hamden, Connecticut, 1962) p. 359.
Owen Chadwick, The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, 1975) p. 76.
Thackeray, The Paris Sketch Book 1840, in Works (12 vols, 1879) VII, 94.
Robert Owen, The Life of Robert Owen by Himself 1857–?(1920) pp. 230, 322
R. K. Webb, Harriet Martineau (1960) p. 180; Carlyle, Reminiscences I, 338; Pankhurst, The Saint-Simonians chs 9–12.
Hill Shine, Carlyle’s Early Reading to (Lexington, 1953) pp. 53–4, 148–9; Pankhurst, The Saint-Simonians pp. 35, [79].
Froude, Forty Years II, 83; Shine, Carlyle and the Saint-Simonians (Baltimore, 1941) p. 58;
[unsigned article], ‘Letters from Thomas Carlyle to the Socialists of 1830’, NQ II (April 1909) 280.
Mill, ‘The Right and Wrong of State Interference with Corporation and Church Property’, The Jurist (February 1833) reprinted in Dissertations and Discussions 3 vols (1859–67) I, 37
Quoted by F. A. von Hayek, in his introductory essay to Mill’s The Spirit of the Age (1942) p. xxi.
Copyright information
© 1990 Valerie A. Dodd
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dodd, V.A. (1990). Saint-Simonianism. In: George Eliot: An Intellectual Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372863_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372863_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38837-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37286-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)