Skip to main content

Imaginary Treason, Imaginary Law

The State Trials of 1794

  • Chapter
The Birth of Pandora

Part of the book series: Language, Discourse, Society ((LDS))

  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

In 1794, two men were found guilty of high treason in Edinburgh, David Downie and the former government spy and possible agent provocateur Robert Watt. Later in the same year in London, three men were found not guilty of high treason: the radical political activist Thomas Hardy, of the London Corresponding Society; John Horne Tooke, the philosopher of language and long-time member of the Society for Constitutional Information; and John Thelwall, lecturer, pamphleteer and poet. Among those originally indicted in London, but later discharged, was the novelist and dramatist Thomas Holcroft. The acquittals have generally been regarded both as the greatest triumph of the revolutionary or reform movement in Britain in the 1790s, and as the point at which that movement went into decline, under the pressure of new laws defining seditious and treasonable practices, and of the need of the accused, during the trials, to insist that their aims were limited and entirely constitutional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1992 John Barrell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barrell, J. (1992). Imaginary Treason, Imaginary Law. In: The Birth of Pandora. Language, Discourse, Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372320_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics