Skip to main content

Communitarianism

  • Chapter
  • 62 Accesses

Abstract

Classical liberals maintain best for all human beings that form of political regime which I have termed the liberal polity. To all its sane adult members, this form of polity accords a measure of liberty that permits them to do whatever they want, provided no one but at most themselves would be harmed by their doing it. The purpose of the present chapter is to review a particular line of objection to this form of societal order which has acquired considerable currency in recent years within academic circles. And not only in academic circles. Of late, this theme has been taken up within the British Labour Party.1 The line of objection indicts the liberal polity in the name of community and in the name of two further sets of desiderata claimed dependent upon this first one. These are, first, the virtues as conceived of by the Aristotelian tradition of ethics, and, second, moral attitudes and beliefs that admit of rational justification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For a good introductory exposition of their thought, see Stephen Mulhall and Adam Swift, Liberals and Communitarians (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shlomo Avineri and Avner de-Shalit (eds), Communitarianism and Individualism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Michael J. Sandel, ‘Morality and the Liberal Ideal’, The New Republic, 7 May 1984, pp. 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael J. Sandel, ‘Democrats and Community’, The New Republic, 22 February 1988, pp. 20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alasdair Maclntyre, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Second Edition (London: Duckworth, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. As well as the references given in note 3, see Michael Sandel, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Markate Daly (ed.), Communitarianism: A New Public Ethics (Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 1994), p. xv.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michael Sandel, ‘Morality and the Liberal Ideal’, The New Republic, 7 May 1984, pp. 15–17, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Michael, J. Sandel, ‘Democrats and Community’, The New Republic, 22 February 1988, pp. 22–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. On this, see A. E. Taylor, Aristotle (New York: Dover, 1955), pp. 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Charles Murray, In Pursuit of Happiness and Good Government (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1988). See especially ch. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Friedrich Hayek, ‘Individualism; True and False’, in F. Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. This account of Aristotle’s conception of the human telos has been heavily influenced by Richard Kraut, Aristotle on the Human Good (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1995 David Conway

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Conway, D. (1995). Communitarianism. In: Classical Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372191_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics