Abstract
Classical liberals maintain best for all human beings that form of political regime which I have termed the liberal polity. To all its sane adult members, this form of polity accords a measure of liberty that permits them to do whatever they want, provided no one but at most themselves would be harmed by their doing it. The purpose of the present chapter is to review a particular line of objection to this form of societal order which has acquired considerable currency in recent years within academic circles. And not only in academic circles. Of late, this theme has been taken up within the British Labour Party.1 The line of objection indicts the liberal polity in the name of community and in the name of two further sets of desiderata claimed dependent upon this first one. These are, first, the virtues as conceived of by the Aristotelian tradition of ethics, and, second, moral attitudes and beliefs that admit of rational justification.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For a good introductory exposition of their thought, see Stephen Mulhall and Adam Swift, Liberals and Communitarians (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992)
Shlomo Avineri and Avner de-Shalit (eds), Communitarianism and Individualism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).
See Michael J. Sandel, ‘Morality and the Liberal Ideal’, The New Republic, 7 May 1984, pp. 15–17.
Michael J. Sandel, ‘Democrats and Community’, The New Republic, 22 February 1988, pp. 20–3.
Alasdair Maclntyre, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Second Edition (London: Duckworth, 1985).
As well as the references given in note 3, see Michael Sandel, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).
Markate Daly (ed.), Communitarianism: A New Public Ethics (Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 1994), p. xv.
Michael Sandel, ‘Morality and the Liberal Ideal’, The New Republic, 7 May 1984, pp. 15–17, p. 17.
Michael, J. Sandel, ‘Democrats and Community’, The New Republic, 22 February 1988, pp. 22–3.
On this, see A. E. Taylor, Aristotle (New York: Dover, 1955), pp. 99–100.
Charles Murray, In Pursuit of Happiness and Good Government (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1988). See especially ch. 12.
Friedrich Hayek, ‘Individualism; True and False’, in F. Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948), p. 6.
This account of Aristotle’s conception of the human telos has been heavily influenced by Richard Kraut, Aristotle on the Human Good (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1989).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 David Conway
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Conway, D. (1995). Communitarianism. In: Classical Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372191_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372191_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39631-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37219-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)