Abstract
There is a common thread running through this collection which highlights a new level of interaction with data and text, integrating thinker and machine in a complex relationship which questions the very concept of ‘humanity’.This may have profound implications for our understanding of what we mean by the humanities; what exactly is a ‘text’ if it changes in the moment of consumption? Deep reading has always been a process of interaction with text (Carr 2010; Kittler 1999), but the digital humanities take this one step further.Instead of simply losing ourselves through our imagination, the nature of digital technology is such that we are becoming integrated with the text itself;our brain is not simply picturing a new world, it is instead developing a new world, opening up new neural pathways in reaction to the speed and expanse of interaction with digital data (Carr 2010: 141). The new digital readers, with hyperlinks and notes, offer a new mediated experience of‘reading’. What then can we define as the text itself if each person’s interaction with it is completely different, following alternative links and pathways? As the digital humanities provide us with new technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Almila, A. (2011) ‘Digital Problems/Digital Solutions?’, The Computational Turn,accessed 11 January 2010, http://www.thecomputationalturn.com/.
Berger, A. (2000), Media & Communications Research Methods (London: Sage).
Berry, D. M. (2008), Copy, Rip, Burn – The Politics of Copyleft and Open Source (London:Pluto Press).
Berry, D. M. (2011), The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age (London: Palgrave/Macmillan).
Bloom, P. (2011), Computing Fantasies: Psychologically Approaching Identity and Ideology in the Computational Age, The Computational Turn, accessed 11 January 2010. http://www.thecomputationalturn.com/.
Booth, C. W., Columb, G. G., Williams, J. M. (2008), The Craft of Research (Chicago:University of Chicago Press)
Carr, N. (2008), ‘Is Google Making Us Stupid? What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains’, The Atlantic July/August 2008. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/07/is-google-making-us-stupid/6868/.
Carr, N. (2010), The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains (New York: W. W.Norton & Co.).
Carusi, A. (2011), Technologies of Representation, Images, Visualisations and Texts, The Computational Turn, accessed 11 January 2010, http://www.thecomputationalturn.com/.
Carvalho, J. (2011), Self-Organisation, Zipf Laws and Historical Processes: Three Case Studies of Computer Assisted Historical Research, The Computational Turn, accessed 11 January 2010. http://www.thecomputationalturn.com/.
Cheeseman, T. (2011), ‘Is What Computation Counts What Counts?’, The Computational Turn, accessed 11 January 2010. http://www.thecomputationalturn.com/.
Cole, T. and Giordano, A. (2011), ‘The Computational Turn: GIScience and the Holocaust’,The Computational Turn, accessed 1/11/2010, http://www.thecomputationalturn.com
Currie, M. (2010), ‘Katherine Hayles Keynote Address at the Computational Turn’, Masters of Media. accessed March 2010.http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2010/03/13/katherine-hayles-keynote-address-at-the-computational-turn/. 2012, ‘The Feminist Critique:Mapping Controversy in Wikipedia’, in D. M. Berry, (ed.), Understanding Digital Humanities (London: Palgrave/Macmillan).
Dayan, D., and Katz, E. (1994), Media Events (London: Harvard University Press)
Deacon, D., et al. (1999), Researching Communications: A Practical Guide to Methods in Media and Cultural Analysis (London: Arnold).
Dexter, S. (2011), Toward a Poetics of Code, The Computational Turn, accessed 11 January 2010. http://www.thecomputationalturn.com/.
Dixon, D. (2012), ‘Analysis Tool or Design Methodology? Is There an Epistemological Basis for Patterns?’ in D. M. Berry (ed.) Understanding Digital Humanities (London:Palgrave/Macmillan).
Durham Peters, J. (1999), Speaking Into the Air (London: University of Chicago Press).
Fabretti, F. (2012), Have the Humanities Always Been Digital? For an Understanding of the Digital Humanities in the Context of Originary Technicity, in D. M. Berry, (ed.) Understanding Digital Humanities (London:Palgrave/Macmillan).
Ganz, A. and Murtagh, F. (2011), From Data Mining in Digital Humanities to New Methods of Analysis of Narrative and Semantics,The Computational Turn, accessed 11 January 2010. http://www.thecomputationalturn.com/.
Habermas, J. (1992), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Hadzi, A. (2011), ‘Data Spheres’, The Computational Turn, accessed 11 January 2010. http://www.thecomputationalturn.com/.
Hayles, N. K. (1999), How We Became Posthuman (London: University of Chicago Press).
Hayles N.K. (2012), How We Think: Transforming Power and Digital Technologies, in D. M. Berry (ed.) Understanding Digital Humanities (London: Palgrave/Macmillan).
Hazel, P. (2010), ‘The Computational Turn’, paulhazel.com, accessed March 2010. http://www.paulhazel.com/2010/03/17/the-computational-turn/.
Heftberger, A. (2012), Film Data for Computer Analysis and Visualisation. In D. M. Berry,(ed.) Understanding Digital Humanities (London: Palgrave/Macmillan).
Hildebrandt, M. (2012), The Meaning and The Mining of Legal Texts, in D. M. Berry, (ed.)Understanding Digital Humanities (London: Palgrave/Macmillan).
Hui, Y. (2011), Computational Turn or a New Weltbild, The Computational Turn, accessed 11 January 2010. http://www.thecomputationalturn.com/.
Kittler, F. (1999), Gramophone, Film, Typewriter, trans. G. Winthrop-Young (Palo Alto, CA:Stanford University Press).
Klocubar, A. (2011), ‘All Your Database are Belong to Us’y: Aesthetics, Knowledge and Information Management, The Computational Turn, accessed 11 January 2010. http://www.thecomputationalturn.com/.
Lin, Y. (2011), ‘Text Mining for Frame Analysis of Media Content’. The Computational Turn, accessed 11 January 2010. http://www.thecomputationalturn.com/.
Malpas, J. and Wrathall, M. (2000), Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity/Heidegger,Coping, and Cognitive Science. Essays in Honour of Hubert L. Dreyfus, vols. 1 and 2 (Michigan: MIT Press).
Manovich, L. (2012), Cultural Analytics: Annual Report 2010, in D. M. Berry, (ed.) Understanding Digital Humanities (London: Palgrave/Macmillan).
Nagel T. (1986), The View From Nowhere (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Nietzsche, F. (1872), The Birth of Tragedy: Out of the Spirit of Music (London: Penguin Classics [1994]).
Nietzsche, F. (1886), On the Genealogy of Morals (London: Oxford University Press [2008]).
Nietzsche, F. (1887), Beyond Good and Evil (London: CreateSpace [2010]).
Nietzsche, F. (1888), The Antichrist (London: CreateSpace [2010]).
Reider, B. and Rohle, T. (2012), ‘Digital Methods: Five Challenges’, in D. M. Berry, (ed.) Understanding Digital Humanities (London: Palgrave/Macmillan).
Schnapp, J. and Presner, T. (2009), The Digital Humanities Manifesto (a collaborative document produced by the Mellon Seminar on the Digital Humanities, UCLA 2008–2009). https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.stanford.edu/~schnapp/Manifesto%25202.0.pdf.
Sennet, R. (1998), The Corrosion of Character (London: W. W. Norton & Company).
Silverstone, R. (1999), Why Study The Media? (London: Sage).
Sredniawa, M. and Hayes, K. A. (2011), ‘A Cultural Analytics-Based Approach to Polymath Artists: Witkacy Case Study’, The Computational Turn, accessed 11 January 2010. http://www.thecomputationalturn.com/.
Stiegler, B. (1998), Technics and Time 1: The Fault of Epimetheus (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
Van Zundert, J., and Antonijevic, S. (2012), ‘Cultures of Formalization: Towards an Encounter between Humanities and Computing’, in D. M. Berry (ed.) Understanding Digital Humanities (London: Palgrave/Macmillan).
Wright Mills, C. (1959), The Sociological Imagination (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Leighton Evans and Sian Rees
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rees, L.E.S. (2012). An Interpretation of Digital Humanities. In: Berry, D.M. (eds) Understanding Digital Humanities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371934_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371934_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-29265-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37193-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)