Abstract
John Adams vigorously resisted Rousseau’s diversion of the republican tradition, and the French embrace of unicameralism, resting on Spartan discipline.1 Adams denied Montesquieu’s claim that climate and soil decide political institutions, and Rousseau’ s belief that “celestial virtue” will be necessary to preserve liberty. For Adams, republican virtue and liberty were products of republican institutions, not their cause, so that a republic may exist “even among highwaymen,” by setting one rogue to watch another, making them honest men by the struggle.2 The secret of avoiding tyranny lay in “equal laws made by common consent,” enforced by “three different orders of men in equilibria.”3 Machiavelli had recognized this “eternal principle”, without which every government must be “imperfect” and every commonwealth “essentially defective.”4 Adams insisted that Americans needed different orders of offices, not of men: “Out of office all men are of the same species, and of one blood”5
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 M.N.S. Sellers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sellers, M.N.S. (1998). Adams’ Conception of Liberty. In: The Sacred Fire of Liberty. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371811_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371811_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40604-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37181-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)