Abstract
There is a broad consensus among commentators, both sympathetic and hostile, that the fundamental idea of the Remarks on Frazer is that magic and religion are essentially expressive activities. Illustrative of this is, first, a passage from theDanger of Words, where M. O’C. Drury writes:
Frazer thinks he can make clear the origin of the rites and ceremonies he describes by regarding them as primitive and erroneous scientific beliefs … Now Wittgenstein made it clear to me that on the contrary the people who practised these rites already possessed a considerable scientific achievement: agriculture, metalworking, building, etc., etc.; and the ceremonies existed alongside these sober techniques. They were not mistaken beliefs that produced the rites but the need to express something. (Drury 1973: x)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Brian R. Clack
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clack, B.R. (1999). Wittgenstein’s ‘Expressivism’. In: Wittgenstein, Frazer and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371682_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371682_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-40020-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37168-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)