Abstract
This book has sought to illustrate the existence of a potentially fatal flaw at the heart of Japan’s alliance with the United States. The perpetuation of the notion that the alliance is based upon an identity of interest continues to belie the reality of parallel, and increasingly divergent, respective national interests. Tensions arise from the dysfunction between superstructural myth and substructural power relations. These tensions, unable to find release during the era of the United States’ inordinate fear of communism, were offered amelioration with the collapse of the Soviet Union and end of the Cold War. These dramatic events provided an opportunity for the anti-Soviet alliance mythology to be laid to rest, intra-alliance structural power relations to be recognised and a new, more mature and equal relationship to be developed. Yet by the mid-1990s this moment of opportunity was in danger of being lost. Political tension between the allies increased. The Soviet threat to the allies was replaced by North Korea and a potential for renewed Russian expansionism. Finally, the redefinition of security in economic terms threatened simply to reinforce existing tensions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
6 Japan’s Alliance and Stable Peace
S. Weeks, Presentation to Australian Institute of International Affairs Symposium, Naval Power in the South China Sea, Canberra, 7 May 1993.
A. Michnik, ‘Zhirinovsky, Mon Amour’, Gazata Wyborcza repr. Guardian, 14 January 1994, pp. 16–17.
J. Steele, Guardian, 7 January 1994, Part 2, p. 3.
Press Conference, Tokyo, USIS Transcript. 8 August 1993, p. 1.
L. Aspin, The Bottom-Up Review: Forces for a New Era, Department of Defense, Washington, 1 September 1993.
L. Aspin, ‘US Reviewing Responses to Military Threats’, Address to National Defense University, Washington DC, 16 June 1993.
L. Aspin, ‘Four Challenges to the New World Order’, Defense Issues, vol. 8, no. 2 ( AFIS, February 1993 ), pp. 1–3.
L. Aspin, Defense Issues, vol. 8, no. 2 (AFIS, February 1993 ), p. 1.
L. Aspin, Beloit Commencement Address: ‘US Faces Four Post-Cold War Security Threats’, USIS Transcript, 18 May 1993, p. 5.
Drawn by Drifte from Aviation Week and Space Technology, 4 November 1986. See R. Drifte, High Technology in the Japanese-American Relationship, BADS Annual Conference, University of Newcastle-UponTyne, England, 17–19 April 1990, p. 16.
E. N. Luttwak, ‘From Geo-Politics to Geo-Economics’, The National Interest, no. 20 (Summer 1990 );
E. N. Luttwak, The Endangered American Dream (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993 ).
R. Vernon, ‘Geo-Economics 101’, The National Interest, no. 34 (Winter 1993/94), p. 103.
A. Wolfers, ‘Collective Defense and Collective Security’, in A. Wolfers (ed.), Alliance Policy in the Cold War ( Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1976 ), p. 51.
R. E. Riggs and J. C. Plano, The United Nations: International Organization and World Politics ( California: Brooks/Cole, 1988 ), pp. 124–5.
J. Galtung, ‘Peace’ in J. Galtung (ed.), Peace: Research, Education, Action: Essays in Peace Research, vol. 1 ( Copenhagen: Christian Eijers, 1975 ), p. 29.
G. Evans, ‘Economic Cooperation and Regional Security in the Asia-Pacific Region’, The Monthly Review, DFAT, Canberra, July 1991, p. 367.
R. J. Hawke, ‘Australia’s Security in Asia: The Strategic Relationship’, The Monthly Period, DFAT, Canberra, May 1991, p. 204.
P. Polomka, ‘Towards a Pacific House’, Survival, vol. xxxii, no. 2 (March–April 1991), p. 173.
E. A. Olsen, US Security Perceptions in the Asia-Pacific Region, NPCSD Working Paper no. 21, York University, Ontario, Canada, December 1992, p. 4.
A. Acharya, D. Dewitt and P. Evans, ‘Overview: The Agenda for Cooperative Security in the North Pacific’, in D. Dewitt and P. Evans (eds), The Agenda for Cooperative Security in the North Pacific: Conference Report, NPCSD Research Program, York University, Ontario, Canada, July 1993, pp. xxxv–xxxvi.
The distinction is well-drawn by Keohane and Nye. Interconnectedness refers to international transactions — money, goods, people or messages — across international boundaries. Interdependency arises from sensitivity, ‘degree of responsiveness within a policy framework’ and vulnerability, ‘the relative availability and costliness of the alternatives that various actors face’:
R. O. Keohane, and J. S. Nye, Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, (Boston, Mass: Little, Brown, 1977 ), pp. 8–9, 12, 13.
R. A. Scalapino, Historical Perceptions and Current Realities Regarding Northeast Asian Regional Cooperation, NPCSD Working Paper no. 20, York University, Ontario, Canada, October 1992, p. 7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 Neil Renwick
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Renwick, N. (1995). Japan’s Alliance after the Cold War. In: Japan’s Alliance Politics and Defence Production. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371453_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371453_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38998-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37145-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)