Skip to main content
  • 38 Accesses

The modern nation-state and the concept of sovereignty emerged together. There is no necessary conceptual link between the two, since the idea of sovereignty could as well have been devised by the citizens of the Greek polis, but they are tightly linked in Western European history. However, recent history has begun to prise the two apart and erode conditions which have supported them and made them significant for the past several centuries. Because they are changing, our ideas about them must change as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2 National Sovereignty.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 8.F.H. Hinsley, Sovereignty, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 9. Alan James’ Sovereign Statehood (London: Allen & Unwin, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edward Mortimer, ‘Iraq: The Road Not Taken’, New York Review of Books, 38 (16 May 1991), pp. 3–7;

    Google Scholar 

  5. George Bush, ‘Continued Pressure on Iraq to Comply With UN Security Council Resolutions’, US Department of State Dispatch 3 (21 September 1992), pp. 718–19;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ronald Newmann, ‘Overview of US Policy Toward Iraq’, US Department of State Dispatch 5 (7 February 1994) pp. 66–8;

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ton Zuijdwijk, Petitioning the United Nations (New York: St. Martin’s, 1982) p. xii.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peter Reddaway, ‘Russia on the Brink?’, New York Review of Books, 40 (28 January 1993) pp. 30–5. -->

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.F. Cortese, Modernization, Threat, and the Power of the Military (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1976) pp. 7 and 21–2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 20.Michael J. Brenner,’EC: Confidence Lost’, Foreign Policy, 91 (Summer 1993) p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 21.S.I. Benn and R.S. Peters, The Principles of Political Thought (New York: The Free Press, 1965, cl958) pp. 299–325

    Google Scholar 

  12. 23.Walter Wriston, The Twilight of Sovereignty (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1992) p. 35 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  13. David B. Walker, Toward A Functioning Federalism (Cambridge: Winthrop Publishers, 1981) p. xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones and Bruce Collins, The Growth of Federal Power in American History (Dekalb: Northern Illinois University, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Daniel J. Elazar, American Federalism: A View From the States (New York: Thomas J. Crowell, 1966) pp. v-vi.

    Google Scholar 

  16. John Austin, ‘A Positivist Conception of Law’ in Philosophy of Law, fourth edn, edited by Joel Feinberg and Hyman Gross (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1991) p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brian Urquhart, ‘The United Nations in 1992’, International Affairs, 68 (April 1992) pp. 311–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 32.Harry Beran, The Consent Theory of Political Obligation (London: Croom Helm, 1987);

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leslie Green, The Authority of the State (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988);

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. John Simmons, Moral Principles and Political Obligations (Princeton: Princeton University Press,1979);

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peter Singer, Democracy and Disobedience (Oxford: Oxford,University Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Gerard Elfstrom

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elfstrom, G. (1997). National Sovereignty. In: New Challenges for Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371095_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics