The modern nation-state and the concept of sovereignty emerged together. There is no necessary conceptual link between the two, since the idea of sovereignty could as well have been devised by the citizens of the Greek polis, but they are tightly linked in Western European history. However, recent history has begun to prise the two apart and erode conditions which have supported them and made them significant for the past several centuries. Because they are changing, our ideas about them must change as well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
2 National Sovereignty.
8.F.H. Hinsley, Sovereignty, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).
9. Alan James’ Sovereign Statehood (London: Allen & Unwin, 1986)
Edward Mortimer, ‘Iraq: The Road Not Taken’, New York Review of Books, 38 (16 May 1991), pp. 3–7;
George Bush, ‘Continued Pressure on Iraq to Comply With UN Security Council Resolutions’, US Department of State Dispatch 3 (21 September 1992), pp. 718–19;
Ronald Newmann, ‘Overview of US Policy Toward Iraq’, US Department of State Dispatch 5 (7 February 1994) pp. 66–8;
Ton Zuijdwijk, Petitioning the United Nations (New York: St. Martin’s, 1982) p. xii.
Peter Reddaway, ‘Russia on the Brink?’, New York Review of Books, 40 (28 January 1993) pp. 30–5. -->
C.F. Cortese, Modernization, Threat, and the Power of the Military (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1976) pp. 7 and 21–2.
20.Michael J. Brenner,’EC: Confidence Lost’, Foreign Policy, 91 (Summer 1993) p. 27.
21.S.I. Benn and R.S. Peters, The Principles of Political Thought (New York: The Free Press, 1965, cl958) pp. 299–325
23.Walter Wriston, The Twilight of Sovereignty (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1992) p. 35 ff.
David B. Walker, Toward A Functioning Federalism (Cambridge: Winthrop Publishers, 1981) p. xiii.
Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones and Bruce Collins, The Growth of Federal Power in American History (Dekalb: Northern Illinois University, 1983).
Daniel J. Elazar, American Federalism: A View From the States (New York: Thomas J. Crowell, 1966) pp. v-vi.
John Austin, ‘A Positivist Conception of Law’ in Philosophy of Law, fourth edn, edited by Joel Feinberg and Hyman Gross (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1991) p. 36.
Brian Urquhart, ‘The United Nations in 1992’, International Affairs, 68 (April 1992) pp. 311–19.
32.Harry Beran, The Consent Theory of Political Obligation (London: Croom Helm, 1987);
Leslie Green, The Authority of the State (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988);
A. John Simmons, Moral Principles and Political Obligations (Princeton: Princeton University Press,1979);
Peter Singer, Democracy and Disobedience (Oxford: Oxford,University Press, 1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1997 Gerard Elfstrom
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elfstrom, G. (1997). National Sovereignty. In: New Challenges for Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371095_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371095_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-39977-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37109-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)