Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The New Middle Ages ((TNMA))

Abstract

Writing about medieval notions of motherhood, Clarissa Atkinson asserts that “medieval Europeans inherited a complex and diverse set of ideas that included widely different interpretations of basic processes.”1 Because medical theorizing was limited in the Western medieval period, sources of medieval ideas on procreation often come from commentaries on selected philosophies from antiquity. Depictions of reproduction in literature show that medieval writers imagined the process in very different ways, at times following the basic tenets of recorded philosophy and in other instances using unique combinations and variations on known currents of thought. Although Greek and Roman philosophies teach much about ways that Western medieval people may have viewed parenthood and the biological construction of gender, the philosophical record is largely silent on the question of miscegenation or mixed-race offspring. Medical writings address miscegenation rarely or obliquely, but the literature of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries seems particularly preoccupied with intermarriage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Clarissa W. Atkinson, The Oldest Vocation: Christian Motherhood in the Middle Ages (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas Laqueur, Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992), 30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joan Cadden, Meanings oj Sex Difference in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  4. William F. MacLehose, “Nurturing Danger: High Medieval Medicine and the Problem(s) of the Child,” in Medieval Mothering, ed. John Carmi Parsons and Bonnie Wheeler (New York and London: Garland, 1996), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, for example, in the Chanson de Roland, “Paien unt tort e chrestïens unt dreit” (pagans are wrong and Christians are right) (1. 1015), Luis Cortés, ed., La chanson de Roland (Paris: Librairie Nizet, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Studies of monstrous birth in medieval thought are abundant, though most are not due to miscegenation. Some possibilities for deformed children include the sinful nature of the mother, conception during menstruation, and disturbing thoughts and visual stimulation by the mother during gestation. See Claude Kappler, Monstres, démons et merveilles à la fin du Moyen Age (Paris: Payot, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jane Gilbert, “Unnatural Mothers and Monstrous Children in The King of Tars and Sir Gowther,” in Medieval Women: Texts and Contexts in hate Medieval Britain: Essays for Felicity Riddy, ed. Rosalynn Voaden, Jocelyn Wogan-Browne, Arlyn Diamond, Ann Hutchison, Carol M. Meale, and Lesley Johnson (Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 2000), 329–44; and Atkinson, Oldest Vocation.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Clovis Brunei, La fille du comte de Pontieu: nouvelle du XlIIe siècle (Paris: Champion, 1926), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jacqueline De Weever, Shebas Daughters (New York: Garland, 1998), particularly chapter 1, “Whitening the Saracen: The Erasure of Alterity.” Since many texts from as early as the Chanson de Roland do note color difference and black Muslims are consistently seen as morally inferior, the absence of color marking is significant.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karl Lachmann, ed., Wolfram von Eschenbach (Berlin: Druck und Verlag von G. Reimer, 1891).

    Google Scholar 

  11. translation cited: Wolfram von Eschenbach, Parzival, trans. Helen M. Mustard and Charles E. Passage (New York: Random House, 1961), 1.1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jerold C. Frakes

Copyright information

© 2011 Jerold C. Frakes

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramey, L. (2011). Medieval Miscegenation: Hybridity and the Anxiety of Inheritance. In: Frakes, J.C. (eds) Contextualizing the Muslim Other in Medieval Christian Discourse. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230370517_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics