Abstract
Writing about medieval notions of motherhood, Clarissa Atkinson asserts that “medieval Europeans inherited a complex and diverse set of ideas that included widely different interpretations of basic processes.”1 Because medical theorizing was limited in the Western medieval period, sources of medieval ideas on procreation often come from commentaries on selected philosophies from antiquity. Depictions of reproduction in literature show that medieval writers imagined the process in very different ways, at times following the basic tenets of recorded philosophy and in other instances using unique combinations and variations on known currents of thought. Although Greek and Roman philosophies teach much about ways that Western medieval people may have viewed parenthood and the biological construction of gender, the philosophical record is largely silent on the question of miscegenation or mixed-race offspring. Medical writings address miscegenation rarely or obliquely, but the literature of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries seems particularly preoccupied with intermarriage.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Clarissa W. Atkinson, The Oldest Vocation: Christian Motherhood in the Middle Ages (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991), 25.
Thomas Laqueur, Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992), 30.
Joan Cadden, Meanings oj Sex Difference in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 18.
William F. MacLehose, “Nurturing Danger: High Medieval Medicine and the Problem(s) of the Child,” in Medieval Mothering, ed. John Carmi Parsons and Bonnie Wheeler (New York and London: Garland, 1996), 4–5.
See, for example, in the Chanson de Roland, “Paien unt tort e chrestïens unt dreit” (pagans are wrong and Christians are right) (1. 1015), Luis Cortés, ed., La chanson de Roland (Paris: Librairie Nizet, 1994).
Studies of monstrous birth in medieval thought are abundant, though most are not due to miscegenation. Some possibilities for deformed children include the sinful nature of the mother, conception during menstruation, and disturbing thoughts and visual stimulation by the mother during gestation. See Claude Kappler, Monstres, démons et merveilles à la fin du Moyen Age (Paris: Payot, 1980).
Jane Gilbert, “Unnatural Mothers and Monstrous Children in The King of Tars and Sir Gowther,” in Medieval Women: Texts and Contexts in hate Medieval Britain: Essays for Felicity Riddy, ed. Rosalynn Voaden, Jocelyn Wogan-Browne, Arlyn Diamond, Ann Hutchison, Carol M. Meale, and Lesley Johnson (Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 2000), 329–44; and Atkinson, Oldest Vocation.
Clovis Brunei, La fille du comte de Pontieu: nouvelle du XlIIe siècle (Paris: Champion, 1926), 1.
Jacqueline De Weever, Sheba’s Daughters (New York: Garland, 1998), particularly chapter 1, “Whitening the Saracen: The Erasure of Alterity.” Since many texts from as early as the Chanson de Roland do note color difference and black Muslims are consistently seen as morally inferior, the absence of color marking is significant.
Karl Lachmann, ed., Wolfram von Eschenbach (Berlin: Druck und Verlag von G. Reimer, 1891).
translation cited: Wolfram von Eschenbach, Parzival, trans. Helen M. Mustard and Charles E. Passage (New York: Random House, 1961), 1.1.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2011 Jerold C. Frakes
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramey, L. (2011). Medieval Miscegenation: Hybridity and the Anxiety of Inheritance. In: Frakes, J.C. (eds) Contextualizing the Muslim Other in Medieval Christian Discourse. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230370517_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230370517_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29374-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-37051-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)