Skip to main content

Participation and Democratic Transformation: Building Effective Citizenship in Brazil, India and South Africa

  • Chapter
Democratization in the Global South

Part of the book series: International Political Economy ((IPES))

Abstract

When we pose the question of democracy and inclusionary development in the Global South we are inevitably drawn to models of political economy. One could be forgiven for quickly turning to European social democracies for inspiration. The democracies of Northern Europe have indeed demonstrated that it is possible to reconcile the imperatives of capitalism, including global competitiveness, with social policies that promote inclusion and equality. But in telling the story of the rise of social democracy and its protagonist, the industrial working class, there is a tendency to telescope history and in so doing to conceal a critical part of the story. And what is concealed, it turns out, is critical to understanding the prospects for inclusionary democratic development in the Global South. Social democracy did not begin with the working class and a grand class compromise that reconciled private profit with social investment. This social bargain was rather the end point of a fairly long, often contentious, process of mobilization and political transformation. It took root, I argue, in local democratic arenas, and the key ingredient was not so much the formation of a working class that came to demand social democracy, as the more general formation of effective forms of citizenship. This more prosaic process was, at the very least, a necessary prerequisite to the kind of politics that would eventually produce social democracy

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Abers, R. (2000) Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, G. and Steinberg, J. (2000) From Comrades to Citizens: The South African Civics Movement and the Transition to Democracy (New York: St Martin’s Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Avritzer, L. (2002) Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Avritzer, L. (2009) Participatory Institutions in Democratic Brazil (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiocchi, G. (2005) Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiocchi, G., Chaudhuri, S., Heller, P. and Silva, M. K. (2006) ‘Evaluating Empowerment: Participatory Budgeting in Brazilian Municipalities’ in Alsop, R., Bertelsen, M. and Holland, J. (eds) Empowerment in Practice: From Analysis to Implementation, pp. 95–128 (Washington, DC: The World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiocchi, G., Heller, P. and Silva, M. K. (2008) ‘Making Space for Civil Society: Institutional Reforms and Local Democracy in Brazil’ in Social Forces 86(3): 911–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baiocchi, G., Heller, P. and Silva, M. K. (2011) Bootstrapping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beall, J., Crankshaw, O. and Parnell, S. (2002) Uniting a Divided City: Governance and Social Exclusion in Johannesburg (London: Earthscan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandhoke, N. (2009) ‘What Is the Relationship Between Participation and Representation?’ in Törnquist, O., Webster, N. and Stokke, S. (eds) Rethinking Popular Representation, pp. 25–35 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chathukulam, J. and John, M. S. (2002) ‘Five Years of Participatory Planning in Kerala: Rhetoric and Reality’ in Economic and Political Weekly 37(49): 4917–4926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, S. and Heller, P. (2003) The Plasticity of Participation: Evidence from a Participatory Governance Experiment (New York: Columbia University ISERP Working Paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J. and Sen, A. K. (1995) India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity (Delhi and New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter B. (2002) Livable Cities?: Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainability (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (1994) ‘The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship’ in World Politics 46(2): 151–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. and Wright, E. O. (2003) Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. (2012) ‘Making Redistributive Direct Democracy Matter: Development and Women’s Participation in the Gram Sabhas of Kerala, India’ in American Sociological Review 77(3): 409–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. and Woolcock, M. (2008) ‘Empowerment, Deliberative Development, and Local-Level Politics in Indonesia: Participatory Projects as a Source of Countervailing Power’ in Studies in Comparative International Development 43(3): 366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, P. (1999) The Labor of Development: Workers and the Transformation of Capitalism in Kerala, India (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, P. (2000) ‘Degrees of Democracy: Some Comparative Lessons from India’ in World Politics 52(4): 484–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, P. (2001) ‘Moving the State: The Politics of Democratic Decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre’ in Politics & Society 29(1): 131–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, P. (2005) ‘Reinventing Public Power in the Age of Globalization: The Transformation of Movement Politics in Kerala’ in Ray, R. and Katzenstein, M. (eds) Social Movements in India: Poverty, Power and Politics, pp. 79–106 (New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, P. (2008) ‘Local Democracy and Development in Comparative Perspective’ in van Donk, M., Swilling, M., Pieterse, E. and Parnell, S. (eds) Consolidating Developmental Local Government: Lessons from the South African Experience, pp. 153–174 (Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, P., Harilal, K. N. and Chaudhuri, S. (2007) ‘Building Local Democracy: Evaluating the Impact of Decentralization in Kerala, India’ in World Development 35(4): 626–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luebbert, G. M. (1991) Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, G. (1999). ‘Civil Society and Its Avatars: What Happened to Freedom and Democracy’ Economic and Political Weekly 34: 1188–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (1996) Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Misao, J. P., et al. (2010) May 2008 Violence Against Foreign Nationals in South Africa: Understanding Causes and Evaluating Responses (Johannesburg: Forced Migration Studies Programme (FMSP), University of the Witwatersrand).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires, Roberto R. C. and Vaz, Alexander C. N. (2011) ‘Participação faz diferença? Uma avaliação das caracterísitcas e efeitos da institucionalização da participação nos municípios brasileiros’ in Avritzer, L. (ed) A Dinâmica da Participação Local no Brasil, pp. 224–266 (unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (1985) Capitalism and Social Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (1999) ‘The State, Associations, and the Transition to Democracy: Early Corporatism in Sweden’ in Rueschemeyer, D., Rueschemer, M. and Wittrock, B. (eds) Participation and Democracy, East and West: Comparisons and Interpretations, pp. 133–156 (New York: M. E. Sharpe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, H. E. and Stephens, J. D. (1992) Capitalist Development and Democracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandbrook, R., Edelman, M., Heller, P. and Teichman, J. (2007) Social Democracy in the Global Periphery: Origins, Challenges, Prospects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. C. (2009) ‘Defects and Deficits in the Quality of Neo-Democracy’ in Bland, G. and Arnson, C. J. (eds) Democratic Deficits: Addressing Challenges to Sustainability and Consolidation Around the World, pp. 19–37 (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1999) Development as Freedom (New York: Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seema, T. N. and Mukherjee, V. (2000) ‘Gender Governance and Citizenship in Decentralised Planning,’ paper presented at the International Conference on Democratic Decentralisation, Thiruvananthapuram, May 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. R. (1993) ‘Citizenship and the Place of the Public Sphere: Law, Community, and Political Culture in the Transition to Democracy’ in American Sociological Review 58 (October): 587–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swilling, M. and Boya, L. (1997) ‘Local Governance in Transition’ in Fitzgerald, P., McLennan, A. and Munslow, B. (eds) Managing Sustainable Development in South Africa, pp. 165–191 (Cape Town: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Isaac, T. M. and Franke, R. W. (2002) Local Democracy and Development: The Kerala People’s Campaign for Decentralized Planning (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnquist, O. (1997) Making Democratisation Work: From Civil Society and Social Capital to Political Inclusion and Politicisation. Theoretical Reflections on Concrete Cases in Indonesia, Kerala, and the Philippines (Oslo: University of Oslo, Research Programme on Popular Movements, Development and Democratization).

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnquist, O., Webster, N. and Stokke, K. (eds) (2009) Rethinking Popular Representation (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cott, D. (2008) Radical Democracy in the Andes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Donk, Mirjam, et al. (2008) Consolidating Developmental Local Government: Lessons from the South African Experience (Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampler, B. (2007a) Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampler, B. (2007b) ‘Can Participatory Institutions Promote Pluralism? Mobilizing Low-Income Citizens in Brazil’ in Studies in Comparative and International Development 41(4): 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wampler, B. and Avritzer, L. (2004) ‘Participatory Publics: Civil Society and New Institutions in Democratic Brazil’ in Comparative Politics 36(3): 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M. (2000) ‘Development at the Millennium: Malthus, Marx and the Politics of Alternatives’ in Geographische Zeitschrift 88(2): 67–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2008) The Roots of Participatory Democracy: Democratic Communists in South Africa and Kerala, India (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Patrick Heller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heller, P. (2013). Participation and Democratic Transformation: Building Effective Citizenship in Brazil, India and South Africa. In: Stokke, K., Törnquist, O. (eds) Democratization in the Global South. International Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230370043_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics