Skip to main content

From Populism to Democratic Polity: Problems and Challenges in Solo, Indonesia

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: International Political Economy ((IPES))

Abstract

Participation through civil society and decentralization has become the main theme within the current debates on democratization.1 The assumption is that participation and decentralization will strengthen democracy. The best Indonesian case in favour of this thesis is the municipality of Surakarta, also known as the city of Solo. Solo has become well known in the Indonesian debate because of its recent positive experience of popular participation. This includes efforts at participatory budgeting and planning in cooperation with political executives, various CSOs and social movements. Many development agencies and pundits refer to Solo’s experience in terms of ‘best practice’ of democratic local governance in Indonesia. Their analyses focus on the actors and claim that participation is a possible way of crafting stable democracy. In turn, they suggest that this participation is a result of decentralization which thus strengthens local democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aspinall, E. and Fealy, G. (2003) Local Power and Politics in Indonesia: Decentralization and Democratization (Singapore: ISEAS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Avritzer, L. (2002) Democracy and Public Space in Latin America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiocchi, G. (2003) ‘Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment’ in Fung, A. and Wright, E. O. (eds) Deepening Democracy, Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, pp. 45–76 (London and New York: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. (ed) (1996) Democracy and Difference: Contesting Boundaries of the Political (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Budiman, A. and Törnquist, O. (2001) Aktor Demokrasi: Catatan tentang Gerakan Perlawanan di Indonesia (Jakarta: ISAI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, S. and Rondinelli, D. (eds) (2007) Decentralising Governance: Emerging Concepts and Practices (Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crib, R. (1990) The Indonesian Killings 1965–1966: Studies from Java and Bali (Monash: Centre of Southeast Asian Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwipayana, AAGN Ari (2004) Bangsawan dan Kuasa: Kembalinya Para Ningrat di Dua Kota (Yogyakarta: IRE Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyrberg, T. B. (1997) The Circular Structure of Power: Politics, Identity, Community (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erb, M. and Sulistiyanto, P. (2009) Deepening Democracy in Indonesia? Direct Elections for Local Leaders (Pilkada) (Singapore: ISEAS Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauzi, N. (1999) Petani & Penguasa: Dinamika Perjalanan Politik Agraria Indonesia (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, J. (1994) The Anti-politics Machine: Development, Depoliticisation and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. (2001) Social Capital and Social Theory (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B., Lapavitsas, C. and Pincus, J. (eds) (2003) Development Policy in the Twenty-first Century: Beyond the Washington Consensus (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadiz, V. R. (2010) Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asian Perspective (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Handayani, S. (2006a) Pelibatan Masyarakat Marginal dalam Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Partisipatif (Sebuah Pengalaman di Kota Solo) (Solo: KOMPIP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Handayani, S. (2006b) Merajut Harapan Menuju Perubahan (Solo: KOMPIP Solo and the Ford Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, J. (2002) Depoliticising Development: The World Bank and Social Capital (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, J., Stokke, K. and Törnquist, O. (eds) (2004) Politicising Democracy: The New Local Politics of Democratization (London: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • Histiralludin, M. (2004) Bergumul Bersama Masyarakat: Berbagi Cerita Proses Perencanaan Partisipatif di Kota Solo (Solo: IPGI Solo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, T. M. Thomas and Franke, R. W. (2002) Local Democracy and Development; The Kerala Peoples’s Campaign for Decentralized Planning (Boston, MA: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (2005) On Populist Reason (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, G. D. (1990) Masa Menjelang Revolusi: Keraton dan Kehidupan Politik di Surakarta1912–1942 (Yogyakarta: UGM Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay, C. (2000) Eksekutif and Legislatif Daerah: Penelitian tentang Potensi Konflik antara DPRD and Birokrasi di Daerah (Jakarta: Kemenristek dan LIPI) (research report).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay, C. (2010) ‘Broken Linkages: A Preliminary Study on Parliament-CSOs Linkages in Indonesia’, paper presented at Euroseas, Guttenberg, August 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manor, J. (2010) ‘Beyond Clientelism: Digvijay Singh’s Participatory Pro-Poor Strategy in Madhya Pradesh’ in Price, P. and Engelsen-Ruud, A. (eds) Power and Influence in India: Bosses, Lords and Captains, pp. 193–213 (London, New York and New Delhi: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordholt, H. S. (2004) ‘Decentralization in Indonesia: Less State: More Democracy?’ in Harris, J. et al. (eds) Politicising Democracy. The New Local Politics of Democracy, pp. 29–50 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordholt, H. S. and van Klinken G., (eds) (2007) Renegotiating Boundaries: Local Politics in Post-Suharto Indonesia (Leiden: KITLV Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, J. (2003) ‘Jawa’: On the Subject of ‘Java’ (Jakarta: Mata Bangsa).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratikno (2005) ‘Initiating Citizen Participation in Local Policy Making in Indonesia: The Case of Surakarta Municipality in the Post Authoritarian Regime, 1999–2002’, paper presented at the Conference on Participatory Planning and Budgeting in America and Asia, Tokyo and Kobe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priyono, A. E., et al. (eds) (2007) Making Democracy Meaningful: Problems and Options in Indonesia (Jakarta: Demos).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivai, A., et al. (2009) ‘Geliat Partisipasi Kelompok Sektoral: Studi Kasus Kota Surakarta’ in J Suhirman (ed.), Partisipasi, Reformasi Kelembagaan, dan Alokasi Penganggaran: Pelajaran dari Lima Daerah, pp. 33–46 (Bandung: FPPM and Yayasan Tifa).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, R. and Hadiz, V. (2004) Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets (London: Routledge Curzon).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Samadhi, W. P. and Warouw, N. (eds) (2009) Building Democracy On The Sand: Advances and Setbacks in Indonesia (Jakarta/Yogyakarta: Demos-PCD Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiraishi, T. (1997) Zaman bergerak: Radikalisme Rakyat di Jawa1912–1926 (Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidel, J. T. (1999) Capital, Coercion, and Crime; Bossism in the Philippines (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhartono (1991) Apanage dan Bekel: Perubahan Sosial di Pedesaan Surakarta1830–1920 (Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhirman (2009) Partisipasi, Reformasi Kelembagaan and Alokasi Anggaran: Pembelajaran dari Lima Daerah (Bandung: FPPM and Yayasan Tifa).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tharakan, P. K. Michael (2004) ‘Historical Hurdles in the Course of the People’s Planning Campaign in Kerala, India’ in Harris, J. et al. (eds) Politicising Democracy. The New Local Politics of Democracy, pp. 107–126 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnquist, O. (2009) ‘Power, Conflict and Democracy: The Analytical Framework’ in PCD Journal 1(1): 13–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnquist, O., Webster, N. and Stokke, K. (2010) Rethinking Popular Representation (London: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1997) World Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2000) Working Together: The World Bank’s Partnership with Civil Society (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Pratikno and Cornelis Lay

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pratikno, Lay, C. (2013). From Populism to Democratic Polity: Problems and Challenges in Solo, Indonesia. In: Stokke, K., Törnquist, O. (eds) Democratization in the Global South. International Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230370043_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics